Daniel Windahl vs Muhammet Haylaz H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Windahl VS Haylaz Head to Head: 1 - 0
The H2H record between Daniel Windahl and Muhammet Haylaz stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 13-01-2016 in the First Round at the Turkey F2, Windahl got the win with 6-1 6-1. Windahl stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Haylaz is no. Ret..
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
825 ( 08-09-14)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
729 ( 14-08-17)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Windahl VS Haylaz H2H Matches played
|
|
Turkey F2 | ||||||||
|
13 Jan 2016 R1 |
Daniel Windahl
Player
Muhammet Haylaz
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
47%
(
29 of
62)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6
1
6
1
|
|||||||
Windahl VS Haylaz Head to head matches stats
| stats | Daniel Windahl | Muhammet Haylaz |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 2 |
| Total Aces | 1 | 2 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 6 |
| Average Match Time | 0:54:0 | 0:54:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 74% (28/38) | 47% (29/62) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 75% (21/28) | 48% (14/29) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 80% (8/10) | 42% (14/33) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 50% (5/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts Won % | 55% (34/62) | 24% (9/38) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Daniel Windahl past matches
|
|
Netherlands F1 | ||||||||
|
14 Jun 2016 R1 |
6
2
6
4
|
L
|
Paul Monteban
Player
Daniel Windahl
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
39 of
67)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Sweden F3 | ||||||||
|
18 May 2016 R2 |
2
6
6
3
7
6
|
L
|
Markus Eriksson
Player
Daniel Windahl
62%
(
67 of
108)
1st Serve %
77%
(
80 of
104)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
52 of
80)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
39%
(
42 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
104)
108
Total Points Won
104
|
H2H | |||||
|
17 May 2016 R1 |
6
0
6
3
|
W
|
Daniel Windahl
Player
Piotr Zbroja
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
55
Total Points Won
30
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Sweden F2 | ||||||||
|
09 May 2016 R1 |
7
5
6
0
|
L
|
Julien Cagnina
Player
Daniel Windahl
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
43
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Greece F2 | ||||||||
|
28 Mar 2016 Q1 |
3
3
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
view more
Muhammet Haylaz past matches
|
|
Turkey F14 (Antalya) | ||||||||
|
10 Apr 2018 R1 |
6
3
6
1
|
L
|
Jaroslav Pospisil
Player
Muhammet Haylaz
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve %
43%
(
21 of
49)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Turkey F13 (Antalya) | ||||||||
|
31 Mar 2018 Q1 |
6
4
6
2
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Tunisia F6 (Jerba) | ||||||||
|
14 Feb 2018 R1 |
6
4
6
3
|
L
|
Mariano Kestelboim
Player
Muhammet Haylaz
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
91%
(
10 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Tunisia F5 (Jerba) | ||||||||
|
07 Feb 2018 R1 |
6
2
6
1
|
L
|
Mariano Kestelboim
Player
Muhammet Haylaz
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
10
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Tunisia F4 (Jerba) | ||||||||
|
30 Jan 2018 R1 |
6
2
6
2
|
L
|
Roberto Ortega-Olmedo
Player
Muhammet Haylaz
45%
(
21 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
46
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Windahl VS Haylaz matches vs all opponents
| stats | Daniel Windahl | Muhammet Haylaz |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 68% (19/9) | 44% (77/98) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 71% (39/16) | 45% (179/218) |
| Games Won/Lost | 58% (278/200) | 48% (1770/1913) |
| Hard W/L | 68% (19/9) | 44% (77/98) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.06 | 0.16 |
| Total Aces | 13 | 287 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.06 | 0.19 |
| Total Double Faults | 13 | 350 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 1156.71 | 994.77 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (250/374) | 54% (2604/4779) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 64% (161/250) | 68% (1776/2604) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (60/124) | 46% (1002/2175) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 51% (26/51) | 39% (173/445) |
| Return Points Won % | 47% (176/377) | 39% (1796/4660) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 22% (2/7) |
| Futures W/L | 68% (19/9) | 45% (75/91) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 72% (18/25) | 44% (76/174) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 43% (18/42) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 33% (1/3) | 46% (22/48) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 95% (20/19) | 82% (78/64) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 5% (20/1) | 18% (78/14) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (7/0) | 13% (97/13) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Windahl VS Haylaz H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Jong Vs Milic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Cattolica Challenger – 9th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Altmaier Vs Tiafoe Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Boss Open – Stuttgart – 9th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Korneeva Vs Naef Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Ilkley Open – Ilkley – 9th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Shymanovich Vs Tararudee Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Ilkley Open – Ilkley – 9th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Korpatsch Vs Ruse Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 9th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Jong Vs Milic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Cattolica Challenger – 9th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Altmaier Vs Tiafoe Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Boss Open – Stuttgart – 9th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Korneeva Vs Naef Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Ilkley Open – Ilkley – 9th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Shymanovich Vs Tararudee Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Ilkley Open – Ilkley – 9th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Korpatsch Vs Ruse Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 9th June 2026 (Day 2)