Cem Ilkel vs Muhammet Haylaz H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Ilkel VS Haylaz Head to Head: 2 - 0
The H2H record between Cem Ilkel and Muhammet Haylaz stands at 2 - 0. In their last encounter on 16-06-2016 in the Second Round at the Turkey F24, Ilkel got the win with 6-4 6-1. Ilkel stands at no. 807 in the rankings, whilst Haylaz is no. Ret..
Cem Ilkel
Ranking
807 ( 17-07-26)
Best Rank
144 ( 29-11-21)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
Muhammet Haylaz
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
729 ( 14-08-17)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
2
Total
0
2
Hard
0
0
Clay
0
0
Indoor
0
0
Grass
0
30 (21-08-1995)
Age
30 (26-10-1995)
185
Height
81
Weight
Right-Handed
Plays
Two-Handed
Backhand
Gavin Hopper
Coach
2013
Turned Pro
56% (438-338)
Career Total W/L
41% (89-128)
61% (288-181)
Career Hard W/L
44% (77-98)
44% (57-72)
Career Clay W/L
24% (9-28)
10% (1-9)
Career Grass W/L
0% (0-0)
55% (92-76)
Career Indoor W/L
60% (3-2)
$225,530
Career Prize Money
$0
0% (0-1)
YTD Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
Ilkel VS Haylaz H2H Matches played
|
Turkey F24 | ||||||||
|
16 Jun 2016 R2 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Muhammet Haylaz
49%
(
20 of
41)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
66)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
14 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6
4
6
1
|
|||||||
|
|
Turkey F8 | ||||||||
|
17 Mar 2014 Q2 |
6
2
6
2
|
||||||||
Ilkel VS Haylaz Head to head matches stats
| stats | Cem Ilkel | Muhammet Haylaz |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 24 | 9 |
| Total Aces | 2 | 1 |
| Total Double Faults | 2 | 8 |
| Average Match Time | 0:36:0 | 0:36:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 49% (20/41) | 48% (32/66) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 80% (16/20) | 59% (19/32) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (11/21) | 32% (11/34) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 43% (6/14) | 100% (2/2) |
| Return Pts Won % | 55% (36/66) | 34% (14/41) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Cem Ilkel past matches
Before:
|
Istanbul Challenger | ||||||||
|
17 May 2026 Q1 |
6
1
5
7
6
3
|
L
|
Vladyslav Orlov
Player
Cem Ilkel
54%
(
48 of
89)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Chisinau Challenger | ||||||||
|
29 May 2025 R2 |
6
4
6
7
7
6
|
L
|
Petr Bar Biryukov
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
68 of
107)
1st Serve %
78%
(
80 of
103)
22
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
1
85%
(
58 of
68)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
61 of
80)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
27 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
26 of
103)
106
Total Points Won
104
|
H2H | |||||
|
28 May 2025 R1 |
6
4
6
3
|
W
|
Cem Ilkel
Player
Mukund Sasikumar
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
74%
(
49 of
66)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Tbilisi Challenger | ||||||||
|
18 May 2025 Q1 |
7
6
6
3
|
L
|
Giles Hussey
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
61 of
95)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
65)
82
Total Points Won
78
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M25 Tbilisi 1 | ||||||||
|
13 May 2025 R1 |
6
2
6
4
|
L
|
Evgeny Karlovskiy
Player
Cem Ilkel
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Muhammet Haylaz past matches
Before:
|
|
Turkey F14 (Antalya) | ||||||||
|
10 Apr 2018 R1 |
6
3
6
1
|
L
|
Jaroslav Pospisil
Player
Muhammet Haylaz
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve %
43%
(
21 of
49)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Turkey F13 (Antalya) | ||||||||
|
31 Mar 2018 Q1 |
6
4
6
2
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Tunisia F6 (Jerba) | ||||||||
|
14 Feb 2018 R1 |
6
4
6
3
|
L
|
Mariano Kestelboim
Player
Muhammet Haylaz
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
91%
(
10 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Tunisia F5 (Jerba) | ||||||||
|
07 Feb 2018 R1 |
6
2
6
1
|
L
|
Mariano Kestelboim
Player
Muhammet Haylaz
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
10
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Tunisia F4 (Jerba) | ||||||||
|
30 Jan 2018 R1 |
6
2
6
2
|
L
|
Roberto Ortega-Olmedo
Player
Muhammet Haylaz
45%
(
21 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
46
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Ilkel VS Haylaz matches vs all opponents
| stats | Cem Ilkel | Muhammet Haylaz |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 61% (288/181) | 44% (77/98) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 59% (631/440) | 45% (179/218) |
| Games Won/Lost | 53% (5350/4741) | 48% (1770/1913) |
| Hard W/L | 61% (288/181) | 44% (77/98) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.32 | 0.16 |
| Total Aces | 1593 | 287 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 | 0.19 |
| Total Double Faults | 771 | 350 |
| Average Match Time | 1:5:51 | 1st Match |
| Average Opponent Rank | 886.27 | 994.71 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (12861/22032) | 54% (2604/4779) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 71% (9108/12861) | 68% (1776/2604) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (4705/9171) | 46% (1002/2175) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 41% (929/2274) | 39% (173/445) |
| Return Points Won % | 40% (8844/22248) | 39% (1796/4660) |
| Slam W/L | 47% (7/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 14% (1/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 52% (79/72) | 22% (2/7) |
| Futures W/L | 69% (198/90) | 45% (75/91) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (280/457) | 44% (76/174) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 56% (87/156) | 43% (18/42) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 56% (74/132) | 46% (22/48) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (280/244) | 82% (78/64) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (280/34) | 18% (78/14) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (188/42) | 13% (97/13) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Ilkel VS Haylaz H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Dzumhur Vs Arnaldi Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Plava Laguna Croatia Open – Umag – 16th July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Korneeva Vs Li Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Athens Open – Athens – 16th July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Faria Vs Ruud Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP EFG Swiss Open – Gstaad – 16th July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Hontama Vs Parks Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Athens Open – Athens – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Vandewinkel Vs Falkowska Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Enka Open – Istanbul – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Dzumhur Vs Arnaldi Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Plava Laguna Croatia Open – Umag – 16th July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Korneeva Vs Li Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Athens Open – Athens – 16th July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Faria Vs Ruud Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP EFG Swiss Open – Gstaad – 16th July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Hontama Vs Parks Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Athens Open – Athens – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Vandewinkel Vs Falkowska Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Enka Open – Istanbul – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
