Cristina Bucsa vs Jasmine Paolini H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Bucsa VS Paolini Head to Head: 2 - 2
The H2H record between Cristina Bucsa and Jasmine Paolini stands at 2 - 2. In their last encounter on 28-02-2026 in the Semifinals Round at the Merida Open Akron - Merida, Paolini got the win with 7-5 6-4. Bucsa stands at no. 33 in the rankings, whilst Paolini is no. 13.
Ranking
33 ( 05-06-26)
Best Rank
30 ( 16-03-26)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
1
Recent Form
Ranking
13 ( 05-06-26)
Best Rank
4 ( 28-10-24)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
2
Main Tour
1
Recent Form
2
2
2
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
Bucsa VS Paolini H2H Matches played
|
|
Merida Open Akron - Merida | ||||||||
|
28 Feb 2026 SF |
Cristina Bucsa
Player
Jasmine Paolini
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
71%
(
50 of
70)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
7
5
6
4
|
|||||||
|
|
Adelaide International - Adelaide | ||||||||
|
08 Jan 2024 R1 |
Cristina Bucsa
Player
Jasmine Paolini
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
51%
(
20 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
46%
(
29 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6
3
6
3
|
|||||||
|
|
Western & Southern Open - Cincinnati | ||||||||
|
16 Aug 2023 R2 |
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Cristina Bucsa
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
44%
(
14 of
32)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
48%
(
23 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
41
|
6
1
6
3
|
|||||||
|
|
Valencia | ||||||||
|
26 Nov 2016 SF |
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Cristina Bucsa
64%
(
61 of
96)
1st Serve %
80%
(
74 of
93)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
44%
(
42 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
93)
99
Total Points Won
90
|
4
6
6
1
6
3
|
|||||||
Bucsa VS Paolini Head to head matches stats
| stats | Cristina Bucsa | Jasmine Paolini |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 2 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 5 | 4 |
| Games Won | 39 | 43 |
| Total Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 12 | 9 |
| Average Match Time | 1:29:3 | 1:29:3 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (187/270) | 65% (184/285) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 55% (103/187) | 55% (102/184) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (36/83) | 46% (46/101) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 47% (17/36) | 46% (19/41) |
| Return Pts Won % | 48% (137/285) | 49% (131/270) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (2/4) | 50% (2/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 67% (3/2) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 33% (3/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) | 33% (3/1) |
Cristina Bucsa past matches
|
|
French Open - Paris | ||||||||
|
25 May 2026 R1 |
6
4
2
6
6
4
|
L
|
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Cristina Bucsa
77%
(
75 of
97)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
93)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
53%
(
40 of
75)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
46%
(
45 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
93)
92
Total Points Won
98
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Internationaux de Strasbourg - Strasbourg | ||||||||
|
19 May 2026 R1 |
2
6
7
6
7
5
|
L
|
Shuai Zhang
Player
Cristina Bucsa
70%
(
90 of
128)
1st Serve %
56%
(
59 of
106)
0
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
8
60%
(
54 of
90)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
26%
(
10 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
17 of
47)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
64 of
128)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
52 of
106)
116
Total Points Won
118
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome | ||||||||
|
07 May 2026 R2 |
7
6
6
2
|
L
|
Qinwen Zheng
Player
Cristina Bucsa
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
11
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid | ||||||||
|
24 Apr 2026 R2 |
6
1
6
7
6
2
|
L
|
Zeynep Sonmez
Player
Cristina Bucsa
71%
(
75 of
106)
1st Serve %
70%
(
54 of
77)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
47 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
40 of
77)
99
Total Points Won
84
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Miami Open - Miami | ||||||||
|
20 Mar 2026 R2 |
6
2
3
2
|
L
|
Yuliia Starodubtseva
Player
Cristina Bucsa
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
56%
(
22 of
39)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
15 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
48
Total Points Won
32
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Jasmine Paolini past matches
|
|
French Open - Paris | ||||||||
|
27 May 2026 R2 |
3
6
6
4
6
3
|
L
|
Solana Sierra
Player
Jasmine Paolini
60%
(
53 of
88)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
96)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
33 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
H2H | |||||
|
25 May 2026 R1 |
7
5
6
3
|
W
|
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Dayana Yastremska
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve %
74%
(
58 of
78)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome | ||||||||
|
09 May 2026 R3 |
4
6
7
6
6
3
|
L
|
Elise Mertens
Player
Jasmine Paolini
60%
(
63 of
105)
1st Serve %
70%
(
71 of
101)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
71)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
41%
(
43 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
101)
105
Total Points Won
101
|
H2H | |||||
|
07 May 2026 R2 |
6
7
6
2
6
4
|
W
|
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Leolia Jeanjean
58%
(
59 of
101)
1st Serve %
61%
(
75 of
122)
0
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
45 of
75)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
40 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
58 of
122)
119
Total Points Won
104
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid | ||||||||
|
25 Apr 2026 R3 |
7
5
6
3
|
L
|
Hailey Baptiste
Player
Jasmine Paolini
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
14
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
92
Total Points Won
76
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Bucsa VS Paolini matches vs all opponents
| stats | Cristina Bucsa | Jasmine Paolini |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 59% (138/94) | 58% (162/116) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 57% (300/226) | 55% (353/293) |
| Games Won/Lost | 53% (2513/2208) | 51% (3012/2882) |
| Hard W/L | 59% (138/94) | 58% (162/116) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.11 | 0.09 |
| Total Aces | 258 | 272 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 | 0.19 |
| Total Double Faults | 692 | 542 |
| Average Match Time | 1:27:25 | 1:21:50 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 365.6 | 333.3 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (9100/14347) | 65% (10898/16792) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 62% (5660/9100) | 60% (6549/10898) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (2380/5247) | 47% (2745/5892) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 47% (931/1981) | 48% (961/2004) |
| Return Points Won % | 47% (6844/14671) | 45% (7300/16206) |
| Slam W/L | 59% (19/13) | 46% (16/19) |
| Masters W/L | 47% (27/31) | 60% (52/34) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 57% (33/25) | 55% (46/37) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 68% (43/20) | 65% (47/25) |
| Futures W/L | 76% (16/5) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (136/229) | 57% (156/272) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 53% (17/32) | 60% (28/47) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 60% (39/65) | 63% (60/95) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (121/108) | 86% (140/121) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (121/13) | 14% (140/19) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (111/30) | 28% (137/38) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Bucsa VS Paolini H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Kabbaj Vs Joint Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Makarska Open – Makarska – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Marcinko Vs Palicova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Makarska Open – Makarska – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Waltert Vs Garcia Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Makarska Open – Makarska – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Trungelliti Vs Hsu Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bad Rappenau Challenger – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Bartunkova Vs Knutson Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Birmingham Open – Birmingham – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Kabbaj Vs Joint Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Makarska Open – Makarska – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Marcinko Vs Palicova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Makarska Open – Makarska – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Waltert Vs Garcia Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Makarska Open – Makarska – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Trungelliti Vs Hsu Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bad Rappenau Challenger – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Bartunkova Vs Knutson Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Birmingham Open – Birmingham – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
