Ze Zhang vs Richard Becker H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Zhang VS Becker Head to Head: 2 - 0
The H2H record between Ze Zhang and Richard Becker stands at 2 - 0. In their last encounter on 13-03-2015 in the Second Round at the Guangzhou Challenger, Zhang got the win with 6-2 6-3. Zhang stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Becker is no. Ret..
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
148 ( 27-05-13)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
336 ( 11-05-15)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
2
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
Zhang VS Becker H2H Matches played
|
Guangzhou Challenger | ||||||||
|
13 Mar 2015 R2 |
Ze Zhang
Player
Richard Becker
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
1
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
7
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6
2
6
3
|
|||||||
|
Kazakhstan F1 | ||||||||
|
18 Feb 2013 R2 |
6
2
7
6
|
||||||||
Zhang VS Becker Head to head matches stats
| stats | Ze Zhang | Richard Becker |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 25 | 13 |
| Total Aces | 1 | 11 |
| Total Double Faults | 2 | 7 |
| Average Match Time | 0:41:1 | 0:41:1 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (30/47) | 55% (36/65) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 73% (22/30) | 64% (23/36) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 71% (12/17) | 31% (9/29) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 40% (4/10) | 0% (0/1) |
| Return Pts Won % | 51% (33/65) | 28% (13/47) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Ze Zhang past matches
|
|
M15 Monastir 26 | ||||||||
|
08 Jul 2022 QF |
6
4
7
6
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
07 Jul 2022 R2 |
6
0
3
6
6
3
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
05 Jul 2022 R1 |
6
1
6
4
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M15 Monastir 25 | ||||||||
|
28 Jun 2022 R1 |
7
5
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M15 Monastir 24 | ||||||||
|
23 Jun 2022 R2 |
6
3
6
2
|
L
|
Terence Atmane
Player
Ze Zhang
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
81%
(
39 of
48)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Richard Becker past matches
|
|
Agri Challenger | ||||||||
|
29 Sep 2015 R1 |
6
3
7
6
|
L
|
Fedor Chervyakov
Player
Richard Becker
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve %
49%
(
29 of
59)
3
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
6
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
24 of
29)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
15 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
18 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Tunisia F24 | ||||||||
|
21 Sep 2015 QF |
7
6
6
4
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
21 Sep 2015 R1 |
6
4
7
5
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
21 Sep 2015 R2 |
6
3
6
4
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
21 Sep 2015 QF |
6
1
6
1
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
view more
Zhang VS Becker matches vs all opponents
| stats | Ze Zhang | Richard Becker |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 59% (284/196) | 56% (47/37) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 58% (644/458) | 56% (107/84) |
| Games Won/Lost | 53% (5511/4826) | 52% (989/898) |
| Hard W/L | 59% (284/196) | 56% (47/37) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.25 | 0.39 |
| Total Aces | 1280 | 359 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 | 0.18 |
| Total Double Faults | 970 | 164 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 827.1 | 1068.94 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (12362/19266) | 55% (1332/2434) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 69% (8547/12362) | 80% (1061/1332) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (3329/6904) | 55% (604/1102) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 44% (839/1895) | 44% (83/188) |
| Return Points Won % | 40% (7665/19178) | 36% (932/2568) |
| Slam W/L | 44% (8/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (8/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 59% (141/100) | 61% (23/15) |
| Futures W/L | 70% (122/53) | 52% (24/22) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (270/452) | 57% (47/82) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 31% (4/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 49% (67/136) | 45% (17/38) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 44% (59/134) | 48% (12/25) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (287/250) | 82% (50/41) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (287/37) | 18% (50/9) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (193/32) | 18% (34/6) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Zhang VS Becker H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Royer Vs Neuchrist Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Iasi Challenger – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Marcinko Vs Burel Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Grand Est Open 88 – Contrexeville – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Aliassime Vs Djokovic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 7th July 2026 (Day 9)
-
Kotliar Vs Selekhmeteva Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Grand Est Open 88 – Contrexeville – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Seidel Vs Kulikova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA W50 Corroios-Seixal – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Royer Vs Neuchrist Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Iasi Challenger – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Marcinko Vs Burel Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Grand Est Open 88 – Contrexeville – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Aliassime Vs Djokovic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 7th July 2026 (Day 9)
-
Kotliar Vs Selekhmeteva Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Grand Est Open 88 – Contrexeville – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Seidel Vs Kulikova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA W50 Corroios-Seixal – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
