Tucker Vorster vs Hugo Nys H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Vorster VS Nys Head to Head: 2 - 0
The H2H record between Tucker Vorster and Hugo Nys stands at 2 - 0. In their last encounter on 08-07-2016 in the Semifinals Round at the Zimbabwe F3, Vorster got the win with 6-3 7-6(10). Vorster stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Nys is no. 673.
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
278 ( 14-09-15)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
Ranking
673 ( 12-07-26)
Best Rank
327 ( 29-07-19)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
2
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Vorster VS Nys H2H Matches played
|
|
Zimbabwe F3 | ||||||||
|
08 Jul 2016 SF |
Tucker Vorster
Player
Hugo Nys
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
25 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
27 of
77)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
6
3
7
6
|
|||||||
|
|
Turkey F30 | ||||||||
|
01 Sep 2014 SF |
7
6
6
1
|
||||||||
Vorster VS Nys Head to head matches stats
| stats | Tucker Vorster | Hugo Nys |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 26 | 16 |
| Total Aces | 2 | 2 |
| Total Double Faults | 2 | 3 |
| Average Match Time | 1:6:30 | 1:6:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (51/87) | 61% (47/77) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 76% (39/51) | 72% (34/47) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 64% (23/36) | 53% (16/30) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 20% (1/5) | 0% (0/5) |
| Return Pts Won % | 35% (27/77) | 29% (25/87) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Tucker Vorster past matches
|
|
South Africa F2 (Stellenbosch) | ||||||||
|
01 Dec 2017 QF |
6
4
7
6
|
L
|
Nikala Scholtz
Player
Tucker Vorster
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
74%
(
53 of
72)
15
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
40 of
53)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
15 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
24 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
H2H | |||||
|
30 Nov 2017 R2 |
6
4
2
6
6
3
|
W
|
Tucker Vorster
Player
Jaime Pulgar-Garcia
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
53%
(
44 of
83)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
9
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
31 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
83)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
H2H | |||||
|
28 Nov 2017 R1 |
6
3
6
4
|
W
|
Tucker Vorster
Player
Milen Ianakiev
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve %
72%
(
50 of
69)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Columbus Challenger | ||||||||
|
22 Nov 2016 R1 |
6
4
7
5
|
L
|
Peter Kobelt
Player
Tucker Vorster
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
16
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
16 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
20 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Champaign Challenger | ||||||||
|
14 Nov 2016 QF |
6
0
7
5
|
L
|
Daniel Cox
Player
Tucker Vorster
45%
(
24 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
11
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Hugo Nys past matches
|
|
Monte-Carlo Rolex Masters - Monte-Carlo | ||||||||
|
04 Apr 2026 Q1 |
6
3
6
3
|
L
|
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Hugo Nys
49%
(
29 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
77%
(
23 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Davis Cup, Group I, PO, KAZ-MON 1-3 | ||||||||
|
06 Feb 2026 Rubber 1 |
6
0
6
3
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Davis Cup, World Group II, 1R, MAR-MON 0-4 | ||||||||
|
14 Sep 2024 Rubber 1 |
6
2
7
6
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Monte-Carlo Rolex Masters - Monte-Carlo | ||||||||
|
06 Apr 2024 Q1 |
6
3
6
1
|
L
|
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Hugo Nys
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
45%
(
29 of
64)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Moselle Open - Metz | ||||||||
|
04 Nov 2023 Q1 |
6
4
6
4
|
L
|
Matteo Martineau
Player
Hugo Nys
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Vorster VS Nys matches vs all opponents
| stats | Tucker Vorster | Hugo Nys |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 68% (153/72) | 61% (94/59) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 65% (330/175) | 61% (215/140) |
| Games Won/Lost | 56% (2666/2078) | 55% (1792/1488) |
| Hard W/L | 68% (153/72) | 61% (94/59) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.14 | 0.18 |
| Total Aces | 331 | 294 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.05 | 0.14 |
| Total Double Faults | 117 | 221 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 1153.31 | 1094.33 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (2449/3764) | 54% (2280/4254) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 74% (1802/2449) | 72% (1652/2280) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (679/1315) | 48% (954/1974) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 40% (123/304) | 41% (209/510) |
| Return Points Won % | 36% (1292/3606) | 42% (1839/4381) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (4/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 43% (12/16) | 48% (15/16) |
| Futures W/L | 71% (137/56) | 67% (78/39) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 68% (148/217) | 61% (94/153) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 57% (50/87) | 50% (17/34) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 57% (31/54) | 45% (22/49) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 94% (141/132) | 82% (99/81) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 6% (141/9) | 18% (99/18) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (84/21) | 24% (54/13) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Vorster VS Nys H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Royer Vs Daniel Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Iasi Challenger – 10th July 2026 (Day 5)
-
Sinner Vs Djokovic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 10th July 2026 (Day 12)
-
Putintseva Vs Gibert Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Nordea Open – Bastad – 10th July 2026 (Day 5)
-
Tomic Vs Walton Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Newport Challenger – 9th July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Mannarino Vs Galarneau Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Newport Challenger – 9th July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Royer Vs Daniel Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Iasi Challenger – 10th July 2026 (Day 5)
-
Sinner Vs Djokovic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 10th July 2026 (Day 12)
-
Putintseva Vs Gibert Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Nordea Open – Bastad – 10th July 2026 (Day 5)
-
Tomic Vs Walton Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Newport Challenger – 9th July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Mannarino Vs Galarneau Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Newport Challenger – 9th July 2026 (Day 4)
