Strong Kirchheimer vs Tyler Zink H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Kirchheimer VS Zink Head to Head: 1 - 1
The H2H record between Strong Kirchheimer and Tyler Zink stands at 1 - 1. In their last encounter on 12-11-2024 in the First Round at the Champaign Challenger, Zink got the win with 5-7 7-5 7-5. Kirchheimer stands at no. 660 in the rankings, whilst Zink is no. 326.
Ranking
660 ( 13-07-26)
Best Rank
375 ( 06-11-23)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
Ranking
326 ( 13-07-26)
Best Rank
278 ( 13-10-25)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
Zink upcoming match
Kirchheimer VS Zink H2H Matches played
|
|
Champaign Challenger | ||||||||
|
12 Nov 2024 R1 |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Tyler Zink
67%
(
69 of
103)
1st Serve %
60%
(
65 of
108)
5
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
44 of
65)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
33%
(
34 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
108)
109
Total Points Won
102
|
5
7
7
5
7
5
|
|||||||
|
|
Columbus Challenger | ||||||||
|
15 Sep 2024 Q1 |
Tyler Zink
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
66%
(
76 of
116)
1st Serve %
68%
(
81 of
120)
7
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
6
66%
(
50 of
76)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
47 of
81)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
46 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
55 of
120)
125
Total Points Won
111
|
6
4
6
7
7
5
|
|||||||
|
|
Champaign Challenger | ||||||||
|
13 Nov 2022 Q1 |
|
||||||||
Kirchheimer VS Zink Head to head matches stats
| stats | Strong Kirchheimer | Tyler Zink |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 3 |
| Games Won | 35 | 36 |
| Total Aces | 10 | 13 |
| Total Double Faults | 10 | 8 |
| Average Match Time | 2:41:50 | 2:41:50 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (150/223) | 63% (141/224) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 66% (99/150) | 67% (94/141) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (35/73) | 53% (44/83) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 42% (8/19) | 39% (9/23) |
| Return Pts Won % | 38% (86/224) | 40% (89/223) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Strong Kirchheimer past matches
|
|
Granby Challenger | ||||||||
|
13 Jul 2026 QF |
6
3
7
6
|
W
|
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Edward Winter
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
70%
(
66 of
94)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
42 of
66)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
94)
88
Total Points Won
73
|
H2H | |||||
|
13 Jul 2026 Q1 |
6
4
6
1
|
W
|
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Kody Pearson
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M25 Laval | ||||||||
|
11 Jul 2026 QF |
7
6
3
6
6
4
|
L
|
Jay Dylan Hara Friend
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
65%
(
77 of
118)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
98)
8
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
3
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
48 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
98)
107
Total Points Won
109
|
H2H | |||||
|
09 Jul 2026 R2 |
3
6
6
1
7
6
|
W
|
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Tristan Stringer
68%
(
74 of
109)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
4
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
42 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
90)
104
Total Points Won
95
|
H2H | |||||
|
09 Jul 2026 R1 |
6
4
6
4
|
W
|
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Miko Lapalme
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Tyler Zink past matches
|
|
Newport Challenger | ||||||||
|
08 Jul 2026 R1 |
6
2
6
3
|
L
|
Arthur Gea
Player
Tyler Zink
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
9
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
96%
(
26 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
H2H | |||||
|
07 Jul 2026 QF |
7
6
6
3
|
W
|
Tyler Zink
Player
Ozan Baris
85%
(
53 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
10
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
28 of
33)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
21%
(
13 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
19 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
H2H | |||||
|
05 Jul 2026 Q1 |
7
5
6
2
|
W
|
Tyler Zink
Player
Adhithya Ganesan
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Tyler Challenger | ||||||||
|
02 Jun 2026 R1 |
6
4
6
4
|
L
|
Landon Ardila
Player
Tyler Zink
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
3
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
61
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Little Rock Challenger | ||||||||
|
30 May 2026 QF |
6
4
7
6
|
L
|
Colton Smith
Player
Tyler Zink
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
51%
(
42 of
82)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
74
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Kirchheimer VS Zink matches vs all opponents
| stats | Strong Kirchheimer | Tyler Zink |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 54% (182/158) | 52% (56/51) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 54% (429/361) | 50% (124/124) |
| Games Won/Lost | 52% (3955/3629) | 50% (1228/1217) |
| Hard W/L | 54% (182/158) | 52% (56/51) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.3 | 0.42 |
| Total Aces | 1128 | 500 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 | 0.19 |
| Total Double Faults | 634 | 226 |
| Average Match Time | 1:31:8 | 1:36:7 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 680.16 | 481.95 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (12338/19301) | 58% (4073/7011) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 69% (8530/12338) | 71% (2882/4073) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (3662/6963) | 51% (1488/2938) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 37% (724/1934) | 37% (222/608) |
| Return Points Won % | 39% (7678/19933) | 37% (2475/6754) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 40% (4/6) | 50% (1/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 43% (50/66) | 51% (18/17) |
| Futures W/L | 60% (128/86) | 54% (37/31) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (179/333) | 52% (56/107) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 48% (51/107) | 45% (18/40) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 41% (46/111) | 65% (22/34) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 79% (198/156) | 86% (56/48) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 21% (198/41) | 14% (56/8) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (142/26) | 16% (51/8) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Kirchheimer VS Zink H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Jacquet Vs Trungelliti Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Plava Laguna Croatia Open – Umag – 13th July 2026 (Day 1)
-
Lajovic Vs Assche Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Plava Laguna Croatia Open – Umag – 13th July 2026 (Day 1)
-
Selekhmeteva Vs Yaneva Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA ATV Bancomat Tennis Open – Rome – 13th July 2026 (Day 1)
-
Okamura Vs Tararudee Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Enka Open – Istanbul – 13th July 2026 (Day 1)
-
Morvayova Vs Bejlek Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Athens Open – Athens – 13th July 2026 (Day 1)
-
Jacquet Vs Trungelliti Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Plava Laguna Croatia Open – Umag – 13th July 2026 (Day 1)
-
Lajovic Vs Assche Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Plava Laguna Croatia Open – Umag – 13th July 2026 (Day 1)
-
Selekhmeteva Vs Yaneva Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA ATV Bancomat Tennis Open – Rome – 13th July 2026 (Day 1)
-
Okamura Vs Tararudee Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Enka Open – Istanbul – 13th July 2026 (Day 1)
-
Morvayova Vs Bejlek Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Athens Open – Athens – 13th July 2026 (Day 1)
