Somdev Devvarman vs Eduardo Schwank H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Devvarman VS Schwank Head to Head: 1 - 0
The H2H record between Somdev Devvarman and Eduardo Schwank stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 05-06-2013 in the First Round at the Caltanissetta Challenger, Devvarman got the win with 6-3 4-1 ret.. Devvarman stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Schwank is no. Ret..
Somdev Devvarman
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
62 ( 25-07-11)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
Eduardo Schwank
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
48 ( 07-06-10)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
1
Total
0
0
Hard
0
1
Clay
0
0
Indoor
0
0
Grass
0
41 (13-02-1985)
Age
40 (23-04-1986)
180
Height
183
73
Weight
83
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Two-Handed
Backhand
Two-Handed
Scott McCain
Coach
Roberto Alvarez
2008
Turned Pro
2005
55% (261-213)
Career Total W/L
61% (300-189)
57% (173-128)
Career Hard W/L
51% (37-35)
57% (52-40)
Career Clay W/L
65% (258-137)
31% (9-20)
Career Grass W/L
11% (1-8)
52% (27-25)
Career Indoor W/L
31% (4-9)
$669,575
Career Prize Money
$329,420
0% (0-0)
YTD Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
Devvarman VS Schwank H2H Matches played
|
Caltanissetta Challenger | ||||||||
|
05 Jun 2013 R1 |
Somdev Devvarman
Player
Eduardo Schwank
42%
(
16 of
38)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
13 of
16)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
12 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
47
Total Points Won
33
|
6
3
4
1
|
|||||||
Devvarman VS Schwank Head to head matches stats
| stats | Somdev Devvarman | Eduardo Schwank |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 10 | 4 |
| Total Aces | 4 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 3 | 3 |
| Average Match Time | 0:57:49 | 0:57:49 |
| 1st Serve % | 42% (16/38) | 62% (26/42) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 81% (13/16) | 50% (13/26) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 59% (13/22) | 50% (8/16) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 57% (4/7) | 50% (1/2) |
| Return Pts Won % | 50% (21/42) | 32% (12/38) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Somdev Devvarman past matches
Before:
|
USA F11 | ||||||||
|
21 Mar 2016 Q1 |
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
USA F10 | ||||||||
|
19 Mar 2016 QF |
6
3
6
2
|
L
|
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Somdev Devvarman
44%
(
28 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
H2H | |||||
|
17 Mar 2016 R2 |
1
6
6
2
6
3
|
W
|
Somdev Devvarman
Player
Lucas Renard
52%
(
35 of
67)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
12
49%
(
17 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
51%
(
34 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
87)
74
Total Points Won
80
|
H2H | |||||
|
16 Mar 2016 R1 |
6
3
6
3
|
W
|
Somdev Devvarman
Player
Isaiah Strode
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells | ||||||||
|
08 Mar 2016 Q1 |
3
6
6
2
7
5
|
L
|
Andrey Rublev
Player
Somdev Devvarman
46%
(
34 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
66 of
112)
0
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
6
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
65%
(
26 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
51 of
112)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Eduardo Schwank past matches
Before:
|
|
Argentina F5 | ||||||||
|
11 May 2015 R1 |
6
4
7
6
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Argentina F4 | ||||||||
|
04 May 2015 R1 |
6
4
6
0
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
04 May 2015 R2 |
7
5
6
2
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Credit Agricole Suisse Open - Gstaad | ||||||||
|
19 Jul 2014 Q1 |
7
6
6
7
6
1
|
L
|
Matteo Viola
Player
Eduardo Schwank
73%
(
85 of
117)
1st Serve %
75%
(
80 of
107)
7
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
60 of
85)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
48 of
80)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
41 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
107)
119
Total Points Won
105
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Recanati Challenger | ||||||||
|
15 Jul 2014 R1 |
6
2
6
4
|
L
|
Victor Baluda
Player
Eduardo Schwank
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
77%
(
48 of
62)
8
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Devvarman VS Schwank matches vs all opponents
| stats | Somdev Devvarman | Eduardo Schwank |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 57% (173/128) | 51% (37/35) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 55% (400/325) | 51% (87/84) |
| Games Won/Lost | 52% (3577/3276) | 50% (821/816) |
| Hard W/L | 57% (173/128) | 51% (37/35) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.27 | 0.19 |
| Total Aces | 909 | 155 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 | 0.14 |
| Total Double Faults | 397 | 111 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 879.92 | 1007.9 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (9516/15832) | 63% (1582/2504) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 68% (6500/9516) | 67% (1064/1582) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (3197/6316) | 49% (450/922) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 43% (722/1686) | 36% (65/182) |
| Return Points Won % | 40% (6514/16094) | 34% (793/2338) |
| Slam W/L | 46% (12/14) | 38% (5/8) |
| Masters W/L | 47% (15/17) | 17% (1/5) |
| Cups W/L | 73% (8/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 58% (55/40) | 20% (2/8) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 59% (70/48) | 71% (25/10) |
| Futures W/L | 68% (13/6) | 50% (4/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (157/274) | 52% (34/65) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 48% (10/21) | 40% (2/5) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 50% (43/86) | 50% (12/24) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 54% (54/100) | 50% (11/22) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (163/137) | 83% (42/35) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (163/26) | 17% (42/7) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (137/34) | 7% (30/2) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Devvarman VS Schwank H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Humbert Vs Bellucci Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Lexus Eastbourne Open – Eastbourne – 23rd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Humbert Vs Bellucci Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Lexus Eastbourne Open – Eastbourne – 23rd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Krueger Vs Knutson Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 23rd June 2026 (Day -5)
-
Birrell Vs Krejcikova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Eastbourne Open – Eastbourne – 23rd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Wang Vs Fernandez Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Bad Homburg Open – Bad Homburg – 23rd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Humbert Vs Bellucci Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Lexus Eastbourne Open – Eastbourne – 23rd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Humbert Vs Bellucci Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Lexus Eastbourne Open – Eastbourne – 23rd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Krueger Vs Knutson Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 23rd June 2026 (Day -5)
-
Birrell Vs Krejcikova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Eastbourne Open – Eastbourne – 23rd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Wang Vs Fernandez Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Bad Homburg Open – Bad Homburg – 23rd June 2026 (Day 2)
