Samuel Groth vs Tennys Sandgren H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Groth VS Sandgren Head to Head: 2 - 1
The H2H record between Samuel Groth and Tennys Sandgren stands at 2 - 1. In their last encounter on 21-10-2016 in the Quarterfinals Round at the Las Vegas Challenger, Groth got the win with 7-6(2) 7-5. Groth stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Sandgren is no. 740.
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
53 ( 10-08-15)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
Ranking
740 ( 09-07-26)
Best Rank
41 ( 14-01-19)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
1
Recent Form
2
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
Groth VS Sandgren H2H Matches played
|
|
Las Vegas Challenger | ||||||||
|
21 Oct 2016 QF |
Samuel Groth
Player
Tennys Sandgren
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
48 of
73)
10
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
86%
(
37 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
13 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
23 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
7
6
7
5
|
|||||||
|
|
Champaign Challenger | ||||||||
|
16 Nov 2013 F |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Samuel Groth
60%
(
61 of
101)
1st Serve %
66%
(
53 of
80)
12
Aces
19
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
44 of
53)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
30 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
23%
(
18 of
80)
89
Total Points Won
92
|
3
6
6
3
7
6
|
|||||||
|
|
Knoxville Challenger | ||||||||
|
09 Nov 2012 QF |
Samuel Groth
Player
Tennys Sandgren
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
24
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
18 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7
6
6
1
|
|||||||
Groth VS Sandgren Head to head matches stats
| stats | Samuel Groth | Tennys Sandgren |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 5 | 2 |
| Games Won | 42 | 34 |
| Total Aces | 53 | 26 |
| Total Double Faults | 7 | 3 |
| Average Match Time | 1:32:1 | 1:32:1 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (138/214) | 63% (144/230) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 84% (116/138) | 74% (107/144) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 64% (49/76) | 56% (48/86) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 29% (4/14) | 25% (1/4) |
| Return Pts Won % | 33% (75/230) | 23% (49/214) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 67% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 33% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/1) |
Samuel Groth past matches
|
|
Australian Open - Melbourne | ||||||||
|
10 Jan 2018 Q1 |
6
4
3
6
7
6
|
L
|
Taylor Fritz
Player
Samuel Groth
59%
(
63 of
107)
1st Serve %
53%
(
55 of
103)
9
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
7
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
38 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
36 of
103)
105
Total Points Won
105
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Brisbane International - Brisbane | ||||||||
|
30 Dec 2017 Q1 |
6
4
7
6
|
L
|
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Samuel Groth
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
10
Aces
21
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
39 of
47)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
14 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
22 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Las Vegas Challenger | ||||||||
|
19 Oct 2017 R2 |
2
1
|
L
|
Jan Choinski
Player
Samuel Groth
67%
(
4 of
6)
1st Serve %
57%
(
8 of
14)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
50%
(
1 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
11
Total Points Won
9
|
H2H | |||||
|
17 Oct 2017 R1 |
6
3
6
4
|
W
|
Samuel Groth
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
14
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
18 of
23)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
13 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
47
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Fairfield Challenger | ||||||||
|
10 Oct 2017 R1 |
6
4
3
6
7
5
|
L
|
Noah Rubin
Player
Samuel Groth
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
103)
9
Aces
21
2
Double Faults
12
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
45 of
57)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
19 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
34 of
103)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Tennys Sandgren past matches
|
|
Savannah Challenger | ||||||||
|
24 Apr 2024 R2 |
1
6
6
0
6
1
|
L
|
Tristan Boyer
Player
Tennys Sandgren
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
H2H | |||||
|
22 Apr 2024 R1 |
6
3
7
6
|
W
|
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Tallahassee Challenger | ||||||||
|
17 Apr 2024 R2 |
6
2
6
7
6
1
|
L
|
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Tennys Sandgren
60%
(
67 of
111)
1st Serve %
65%
(
63 of
97)
7
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
59%
(
26 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
33%
(
37 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
97)
113
Total Points Won
95
|
H2H | |||||
|
16 Apr 2024 R1 |
7
5
6
3
|
W
|
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Martin Damm
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Sarasota Challenger | ||||||||
|
13 Apr 2024 SF |
6
2
3
6
6
4
|
L
|
Zizou Bergs
Player
Tennys Sandgren
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
43%
(
52 of
120)
8
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
8
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
53 of
120)
104
Total Points Won
92
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Groth VS Sandgren matches vs all opponents
| stats | Samuel Groth | Tennys Sandgren |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 53% (199/177) | 58% (241/175) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 52% (471/437) | 57% (564/421) |
| Games Won/Lost | 51% (4747/4531) | 52% (5034/4573) |
| Hard W/L | 53% (199/177) | 58% (241/175) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.6 | 0.48 |
| Total Aces | 2717 | 2247 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 | 0.16 |
| Total Double Faults | 959 | 768 |
| Average Match Time | 1st Match | 1:20:12 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 932.37 | 706.9 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (8692/14690) | 61% (14682/24106) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 79% (6841/8692) | 73% (10686/14682) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (3000/5996) | 50% (4684/9422) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 33% (309/933) | 38% (823/2187) |
| Return Points Won % | 32% (4579/14327) | 37% (8926/23960) |
| Slam W/L | 29% (7/17) | 42% (15/21) |
| Masters W/L | 36% (5/9) | 39% (9/14) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 39% (24/37) | 38% (15/24) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 52% (92/84) | 56% (104/82) |
| Futures W/L | 72% (71/27) | 75% (98/33) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (192/355) | 58% (229/392) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 38% (5/13) | 50% (11/22) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 50% (112/225) | 51% (93/182) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 53% (79/149) | 47% (58/123) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (191/152) | 84% (247/207) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (191/38) | 16% (247/40) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (183/45) | 21% (169/35) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Groth VS Sandgren H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Brooksby Vs Maloney Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Newport Challenger – 9th July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Waltert Vs Laboutkova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Nordea Open – Bastad – 8th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Lepchenko Vs Korpatsch Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Nordea Open – Bastad – 8th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Royer Vs Neuchrist Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Iasi Challenger – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Marcinko Vs Burel Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Grand Est Open 88 – Contrexeville – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Brooksby Vs Maloney Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Newport Challenger – 9th July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Waltert Vs Laboutkova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Nordea Open – Bastad – 8th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Lepchenko Vs Korpatsch Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Nordea Open – Bastad – 8th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Royer Vs Neuchrist Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Iasi Challenger – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Marcinko Vs Burel Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Grand Est Open 88 – Contrexeville – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
