Samuel Groth vs Michael Venus H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Groth VS Venus Head to Head: 1 - 0
The H2H record between Samuel Groth and Michael Venus stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 11-06-2014 in the Second Round at the Nottingham-2 Challenger, Groth got the win with 7-6(13) 6-4. Groth stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Venus is no. Ret..
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
53 ( 10-08-15)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
274 ( 25-07-11)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
Groth VS Venus H2H Matches played
|
|
Nottingham-2 Challenger | ||||||||
|
11 Jun 2014 R2 |
Samuel Groth
Player
Michael Venus
77%
(
61 of
79)
1st Serve %
69%
(
52 of
75)
17
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
80%
(
49 of
61)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
39 of
52)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
20 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
7
6
6
4
|
|||||||
Groth VS Venus Head to head matches stats
| stats | Samuel Groth | Michael Venus |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 10 |
| Total Aces | 17 | 4 |
| Total Double Faults | 1 | 0 |
| Average Match Time | 1:26:33 | 1:26:33 |
| 1st Serve % | 77% (61/79) | 69% (52/75) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 80% (49/61) | 75% (39/52) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 56% (10/18) | 61% (14/23) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Return Pts Won % | 29% (22/75) | 25% (20/79) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Samuel Groth past matches
|
|
Australian Open - Melbourne | ||||||||
|
10 Jan 2018 Q1 |
6
4
3
6
7
6
|
L
|
Taylor Fritz
Player
Samuel Groth
59%
(
63 of
107)
1st Serve %
53%
(
55 of
103)
9
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
7
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
38 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
36 of
103)
105
Total Points Won
105
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Brisbane International - Brisbane | ||||||||
|
30 Dec 2017 Q1 |
6
4
7
6
|
L
|
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Samuel Groth
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
10
Aces
21
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
39 of
47)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
14 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
22 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Las Vegas Challenger | ||||||||
|
19 Oct 2017 R2 |
2
1
|
L
|
Jan Choinski
Player
Samuel Groth
67%
(
4 of
6)
1st Serve %
57%
(
8 of
14)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
50%
(
1 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
11
Total Points Won
9
|
H2H | |||||
|
17 Oct 2017 R1 |
6
3
6
4
|
W
|
Samuel Groth
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
14
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
18 of
23)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
13 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
47
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Fairfield Challenger | ||||||||
|
10 Oct 2017 R1 |
6
4
3
6
7
5
|
L
|
Noah Rubin
Player
Samuel Groth
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
103)
9
Aces
21
2
Double Faults
12
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
45 of
57)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
19 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
34 of
103)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Michael Venus past matches
|
|
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome | ||||||||
|
12 Sep 2020 Q1 |
6
1
6
1
|
L
|
Jeremy Chardy
Player
Michael Venus
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
All Lower level tournaments | ||||||||
|
15 Jun 2020 R1 |
7
6
5
7
6
2
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
14 Jun 2020 R1 |
6
2
6
1
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
ASB Classic - Auckland | ||||||||
|
13 Jan 2020 R1 |
6
4
6
3
|
L
|
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Michael Venus
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
15
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
24 of
30)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Davis Cup, Group I, PO, KOR-NZL 3-2 | ||||||||
|
15 Sep 2018 Rubber 5 |
7
6
6
4
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
view more
Groth VS Venus matches vs all opponents
| stats | Samuel Groth | Michael Venus |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 53% (199/177) | 53% (153/137) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 52% (471/437) | 53% (357/320) |
| Games Won/Lost | 51% (4747/4531) | 52% (3367/3056) |
| Hard W/L | 53% (199/177) | 53% (153/137) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.6 | 0.25 |
| Total Aces | 2717 | 797 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 | 0.12 |
| Total Double Faults | 959 | 378 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 932.52 | 1018.3 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (8692/14690) | 57% (4219/7449) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 79% (6841/8692) | 74% (3126/4219) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (3000/5996) | 50% (1622/3230) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 33% (309/933) | 37% (220/590) |
| Return Points Won % | 32% (4579/14327) | 36% (2636/7362) |
| Slam W/L | 29% (7/17) | 33% (1/2) |
| Masters W/L | 36% (5/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/2) | 50% (4/4) |
| Main Tour W/L | 39% (24/37) | 34% (11/21) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 52% (92/84) | 55% (66/54) |
| Futures W/L | 72% (71/27) | 56% (71/56) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (192/355) | 53% (149/281) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 38% (5/13) | 43% (3/7) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 50% (112/225) | 42% (43/102) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 53% (79/149) | 46% (41/89) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (191/152) | 85% (152/129) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (191/38) | 15% (152/23) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (183/45) | 17% (138/24) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Groth VS Venus H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Baez Vs Molcan Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Prostejov Challenger – 7th June 2026 (Day 7)
-
Seidel Vs Minnen Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 7th June 2026 (Day 0)
-
Bonzi Vs Tomic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 7th June 2026 (Day 0)
-
Vandewinkel Vs Koevermans Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 7th June 2026 (Day 0)
-
Inglis Vs Parks Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA The HSBC Championships – London – 6th June 2026 (Day -1)
-
Baez Vs Molcan Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Prostejov Challenger – 7th June 2026 (Day 7)
-
Seidel Vs Minnen Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 7th June 2026 (Day 0)
-
Bonzi Vs Tomic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 7th June 2026 (Day 0)
-
Vandewinkel Vs Koevermans Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 7th June 2026 (Day 0)
-
Inglis Vs Parks Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA The HSBC Championships – London – 6th June 2026 (Day -1)
