Samuel Groth vs Mate Pavic H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Groth VS Pavic Head to Head: 1 - 1
The H2H record between Samuel Groth and Mate Pavic stands at 1 - 1. In their last encounter on 16-08-2014 in the Q2 round Round at the Winston-Salem Open - Winston-Salem, Pavic got the win with 7-6(5) 6-4. Groth stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Pavic is no. Ret..
Samuel Groth
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
53 ( 10-08-15)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
Mate Pavic
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
295 ( 06-05-13)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
1
Total
1
0
Hard
1
0
Clay
0
1
Indoor
0
0
Grass
0
38 (19-10-1987)
Age
32 (04-07-1993)
193
Height
191
100
Weight
83
Right-Handed
Plays
Left-Handed
One-Handed
Backhand
Two-Handed
Billy Heiser
Coach
Nadja Pavic
2006
Turned Pro
2011
57% (387-296)
Career Total W/L
51% (140-135)
53% (199-177)
Career Hard W/L
63% (64-37)
53% (44-39)
Career Clay W/L
41% (39-56)
69% (85-38)
Career Grass W/L
65% (15-8)
58% (59-42)
Career Indoor W/L
39% (22-34)
$650,305
Career Prize Money
$52,105
0% (0-0)
YTD Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
Groth VS Pavic H2H Matches played
|
Winston-Salem Open - Winston-Salem | ||||||||
|
16 Aug 2014 Q2 |
Mate Pavic
Player
Samuel Groth
69%
(
52 of
75)
1st Serve %
49%
(
39 of
79)
6
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
11
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
32 of
39)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
21 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
69
|
7
6
6
4
|
|||||||
|
Toyota Challenger | ||||||||
|
21 Nov 2013 R2 |
Samuel Groth
Player
Mate Pavic
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
15
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
84%
(
38 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6
3
6
4
|
|||||||
Groth VS Pavic Head to head matches stats
| stats | Samuel Groth | Mate Pavic |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 22 | 20 |
| Total Aces | 25 | 9 |
| Total Double Faults | 13 | 8 |
| Average Match Time | 1:18:53 | 1:18:53 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (84/143) | 67% (84/125) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 83% (70/84) | 73% (61/84) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (23/59) | 56% (23/41) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 38% (3/8) | 22% (2/9) |
| Return Pts Won % | 33% (41/125) | 35% (50/143) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Samuel Groth past matches
Before:
|
|
Australian Open - Melbourne | ||||||||
|
10 Jan 2018 Q1 |
6
4
3
6
7
6
|
L
|
Taylor Fritz
Player
Samuel Groth
59%
(
63 of
107)
1st Serve %
53%
(
55 of
103)
9
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
7
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
38 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
36 of
103)
105
Total Points Won
105
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Brisbane International - Brisbane | ||||||||
|
30 Dec 2017 Q1 |
6
4
7
6
|
L
|
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Samuel Groth
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
10
Aces
21
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
39 of
47)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
14 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
22 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Las Vegas Challenger | ||||||||
|
19 Oct 2017 R2 |
2
1
|
L
|
Jan Choinski
Player
Samuel Groth
67%
(
4 of
6)
1st Serve %
57%
(
8 of
14)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
50%
(
1 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
11
Total Points Won
9
|
H2H | |||||
|
17 Oct 2017 R1 |
6
3
6
4
|
W
|
Samuel Groth
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
14
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
18 of
23)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
13 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
47
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Fairfield Challenger | ||||||||
|
10 Oct 2017 R1 |
6
4
3
6
7
5
|
L
|
Noah Rubin
Player
Samuel Groth
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
103)
9
Aces
21
2
Double Faults
12
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
45 of
57)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
19 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
34 of
103)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Mate Pavic past matches
Before:
|
All Lower level tournaments | ||||||||
|
15 Jun 2020 R1 |
7
6
6
4
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Chengdu Open - Chengdu | ||||||||
|
25 Sep 2017 R1 |
6
1
|
L
|
Yuichi Sugita
Player
Mate Pavic
47%
(
9 of
19)
1st Serve %
47%
(
8 of
17)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
7 of
9)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
90%
(
9 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
3 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
26
Total Points Won
10
|
H2H | |||||
|
24 Sep 2017 QF |
6
4
7
6
|
W
|
Mate Pavic
Player
Zihao Xia
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
48 of
73)
14
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
92%
(
36 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
13 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
27 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
H2H | |||||
|
23 Sep 2017 Q1 |
6
3
5
7
7
6
|
W
|
Mate Pavic
Player
Yasutaka Uchiyama
60%
(
70 of
116)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
102)
10
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
42 of
61)
48%
(
22 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
42 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
33 of
102)
107
Total Points Won
111
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Abierto Mexicano - Los Cabos | ||||||||
|
06 Aug 2016 Q1 |
6
4
6
7
6
3
|
L
|
Mischa Zverev
Player
Mate Pavic
54%
(
59 of
110)
1st Serve %
51%
(
52 of
101)
5
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
4
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
39 of
52)
53%
(
27 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
39 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
101)
111
Total Points Won
100
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Groth VS Pavic matches vs all opponents
| stats | Samuel Groth | Mate Pavic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 53% (199/177) | 63% (64/37) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 52% (471/437) | 60% (147/96) |
| Games Won/Lost | 51% (4747/4531) | 54% (1257/1088) |
| Hard W/L | 53% (199/177) | 63% (64/37) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.6 | 0.21 |
| Total Aces | 2717 | 242 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 | 0.09 |
| Total Double Faults | 959 | 100 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 931.81 | 1013.1 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (8692/14690) | 63% (1448/2296) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 79% (6841/8692) | 71% (1028/1448) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (3000/5996) | 48% (408/848) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 33% (309/933) | 41% (68/166) |
| Return Points Won % | 32% (4579/14327) | 36% (816/2254) |
| Slam W/L | 29% (7/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 36% (5/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 39% (24/37) | 42% (5/7) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 52% (92/84) | 43% (9/12) |
| Futures W/L | 72% (71/27) | 74% (50/18) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (192/355) | 64% (63/99) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 38% (5/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 50% (112/225) | 54% (25/46) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 53% (79/149) | 53% (23/43) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (191/152) | 81% (68/55) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (191/38) | 19% (68/13) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (183/45) | 27% (33/9) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Groth VS Pavic H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Sonmez Vs Linette Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 12th June 2026 (Day 5)
-
Jong Vs Cecchinato Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Cattolica Challenger – 12th June 2026 (Day 5)
-
Shevchenko Vs Mrva Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bratislava Challenger – 12th June 2026 (Day 5)
-
Tan Vs Tararudee Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Ilkley Open – Ilkley – 11th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Daniel Vs Nava Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bratislava Challenger – 11th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Sonmez Vs Linette Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 12th June 2026 (Day 5)
-
Jong Vs Cecchinato Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Cattolica Challenger – 12th June 2026 (Day 5)
-
Shevchenko Vs Mrva Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bratislava Challenger – 12th June 2026 (Day 5)
-
Tan Vs Tararudee Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Ilkley Open – Ilkley – 11th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Daniel Vs Nava Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bratislava Challenger – 11th June 2026 (Day 4)
