Samuel Groth vs John-Patrick Smith H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Groth VS Smith Head to Head: 3 - 1
The H2H record between Samuel Groth and John-Patrick Smith stands at 3 - 1. In their last encounter on 16-06-2017 in the Quarterfinals Round at the Nottingham Challenger, Groth got the win with 7-6(6) 6-2. Groth stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Smith is no. Ret..
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
53 ( 10-08-15)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
108 ( 28-09-15)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
3
1
0
0
0
1
2
0
1
0
Groth VS Smith H2H Matches played
|
|
Nottingham Challenger | ||||||||
|
16 Jun 2017 QF |
Samuel Groth
Player
John-Patrick Smith
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
74%
(
51 of
69)
9
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
94%
(
34 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
11 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
7
6
6
2
|
|||||||
|
|
Taipei City Challenger | ||||||||
|
30 Apr 2015 R2 |
Samuel Groth
Player
John-Patrick Smith
74%
(
55 of
74)
1st Serve %
74%
(
52 of
70)
18
Aces
14
4
Double Faults
3
85%
(
47 of
55)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
41 of
52)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
14 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
24%
(
17 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
7
6
7
6
|
|||||||
|
|
Knoxville Challenger | ||||||||
|
05 Nov 2013 R1 |
Samuel Groth
Player
John-Patrick Smith
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6
3
6
3
|
|||||||
|
|
Anning Challenger | ||||||||
|
30 Apr 2013 R1 |
John-Patrick Smith
Player
Samuel Groth
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
4
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
74%
(
20 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
17 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
7
6
6
3
|
|||||||
Groth VS Smith Head to head matches stats
| stats | Samuel Groth | John-Patrick Smith |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 3 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 6 | 2 |
| Games Won | 48 | 39 |
| Total Aces | 42 | 26 |
| Total Double Faults | 14 | 9 |
| Average Match Time | 1:17:54 | 1:17:54 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (158/241) | 68% (184/271) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 85% (135/158) | 71% (130/184) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 60% (50/83) | 59% (51/87) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 42% (5/12) | 50% (1/2) |
| Return Pts Won % | 33% (90/271) | 23% (56/241) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 75% (3/4) | 25% (1/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 75% (3/4) | 25% (1/4) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (3/3) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (3/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (3/0) |
Samuel Groth past matches
|
|
Australian Open - Melbourne | ||||||||
|
10 Jan 2018 Q1 |
6
4
3
6
7
6
|
L
|
Taylor Fritz
Player
Samuel Groth
59%
(
63 of
107)
1st Serve %
53%
(
55 of
103)
9
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
7
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
38 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
36 of
103)
105
Total Points Won
105
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Brisbane International - Brisbane | ||||||||
|
30 Dec 2017 Q1 |
6
4
7
6
|
L
|
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Samuel Groth
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
10
Aces
21
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
39 of
47)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
14 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
22 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Las Vegas Challenger | ||||||||
|
19 Oct 2017 R2 |
2
1
|
L
|
Jan Choinski
Player
Samuel Groth
67%
(
4 of
6)
1st Serve %
57%
(
8 of
14)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
50%
(
1 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
11
Total Points Won
9
|
H2H | |||||
|
17 Oct 2017 R1 |
6
3
6
4
|
W
|
Samuel Groth
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
14
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
18 of
23)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
13 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
47
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Fairfield Challenger | ||||||||
|
10 Oct 2017 R1 |
6
4
3
6
7
5
|
L
|
Noah Rubin
Player
Samuel Groth
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
103)
9
Aces
21
2
Double Faults
12
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
45 of
57)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
19 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
34 of
103)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
H2H | |||||
view more
John-Patrick Smith past matches
|
|
Santo Domingo Challenger | ||||||||
|
08 Aug 2023 QF |
7
6
6
3
|
L
|
Kyle Seelig
Player
John-Patrick Smith
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
H2H | |||||
|
06 Aug 2023 Q1 |
3
6
7
6
6
1
|
W
|
John-Patrick Smith
Player
Kiranpal Pannu
66%
(
54 of
82)
1st Serve %
51%
(
52 of
102)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
98
Total Points Won
86
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Korea Open - Seoul | ||||||||
|
24 Sep 2022 Q1 |
6
3
6
1
|
L
|
Yosuke Watanuki
Player
John-Patrick Smith
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
12
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
17%
(
6 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Indianapolis Challenger | ||||||||
|
17 Jul 2022 Q1 |
6
3
7
6
|
L
|
Billy Harris
Player
John-Patrick Smith
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
9
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Phoenix Challenger | ||||||||
|
14 Mar 2022 Q1 |
6
1
6
4
|
L
|
Thomas Fabbiano
Player
John-Patrick Smith
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Groth VS Smith matches vs all opponents
| stats | Samuel Groth | John-Patrick Smith |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 53% (199/177) | 55% (174/143) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 52% (471/437) | 54% (396/344) |
| Games Won/Lost | 51% (4747/4531) | 52% (3738/3392) |
| Hard W/L | 53% (199/177) | 55% (174/143) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.6 | 0.43 |
| Total Aces | 2717 | 1490 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 | 0.16 |
| Total Double Faults | 959 | 557 |
| Average Match Time | 1st Match | 1:23:32 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 932.37 | 797.91 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (8692/14690) | 64% (12983/20142) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 79% (6841/8692) | 71% (9190/12983) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (3000/5996) | 49% (3543/7159) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 33% (309/933) | 41% (784/1915) |
| Return Points Won % | 32% (4579/14327) | 38% (7708/20107) |
| Slam W/L | 29% (7/17) | 47% (15/17) |
| Masters W/L | 36% (5/9) | 40% (4/6) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 39% (24/37) | 45% (24/29) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 52% (92/84) | 55% (104/84) |
| Futures W/L | 72% (71/27) | 79% (27/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (192/355) | 56% (173/311) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 38% (5/13) | 0% (0/4) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 50% (112/225) | 42% (44/104) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 53% (79/149) | 54% (55/102) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (191/152) | 83% (172/143) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (191/38) | 17% (172/29) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (183/45) | 21% (145/30) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Groth VS Smith H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Royer Vs Neuchrist Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Iasi Challenger – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Marcinko Vs Burel Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Grand Est Open 88 – Contrexeville – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Aliassime Vs Djokovic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 7th July 2026 (Day 9)
-
Kotliar Vs Selekhmeteva Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Grand Est Open 88 – Contrexeville – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Seidel Vs Kulikova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA W50 Corroios-Seixal – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Royer Vs Neuchrist Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Iasi Challenger – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Marcinko Vs Burel Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Grand Est Open 88 – Contrexeville – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Aliassime Vs Djokovic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 7th July 2026 (Day 9)
-
Kotliar Vs Selekhmeteva Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Grand Est Open 88 – Contrexeville – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Seidel Vs Kulikova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA W50 Corroios-Seixal – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
