Samuel Groth vs Jason Jung H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Groth VS Jung Head to Head: 3 - 0
The H2H record between Samuel Groth and Jason Jung stands at 3 - 0. In their last encounter on 09-08-2017 in the Second Round at the Aptos Challenger, Groth got the win with 4-6 6-3 6-0. Groth stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Jung is no. 856.
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
53 ( 10-08-15)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
Ranking
856 ( 10-06-26)
Best Rank
114 ( 30-07-18)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
3
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
Groth VS Jung H2H Matches played
|
|
Aptos Challenger | ||||||||
|
09 Aug 2017 R2 |
Samuel Groth
Player
Jason Jung
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
18
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
7
87%
(
39 of
45)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
77)
86
Total Points Won
67
|
4
6
6
3
6
0
|
|||||||
|
|
Gimcheon Challenger | ||||||||
|
08 May 2014 R2 |
Samuel Groth
Player
Jason Jung
68%
(
71 of
104)
1st Serve %
72%
(
73 of
102)
18
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
82%
(
58 of
71)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
55 of
73)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
31 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
26 of
102)
99
Total Points Won
107
|
5
7
7
6
6
4
|
|||||||
|
|
Toyota Challenger | ||||||||
|
22 Nov 2013 QF |
Samuel Groth
Player
Jason Jung
59%
(
61 of
104)
1st Serve %
64%
(
60 of
94)
28
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
89%
(
54 of
61)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
44 of
60)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
26 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
25 of
94)
103
Total Points Won
95
|
6
7
7
6
6
4
|
|||||||
Groth VS Jung Head to head matches stats
| stats | Samuel Groth | Jason Jung |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 3 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 6 | 3 |
| Games Won | 53 | 43 |
| Total Aces | 64 | 9 |
| Total Double Faults | 16 | 11 |
| Average Match Time | 2:1:53 | 2:1:53 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (177/284) | 65% (178/273) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 85% (151/177) | 73% (130/178) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (53/107) | 62% (59/95) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 47% (7/15) | 25% (3/12) |
| Return Pts Won % | 31% (84/273) | 28% (80/284) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/3) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (3/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Samuel Groth past matches
|
|
Australian Open - Melbourne | ||||||||
|
10 Jan 2018 Q1 |
6
4
3
6
7
6
|
L
|
Taylor Fritz
Player
Samuel Groth
59%
(
63 of
107)
1st Serve %
53%
(
55 of
103)
9
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
7
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
38 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
36 of
103)
105
Total Points Won
105
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Brisbane International - Brisbane | ||||||||
|
30 Dec 2017 Q1 |
6
4
7
6
|
L
|
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Samuel Groth
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
10
Aces
21
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
39 of
47)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
14 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
22 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Las Vegas Challenger | ||||||||
|
19 Oct 2017 R2 |
2
1
|
L
|
Jan Choinski
Player
Samuel Groth
67%
(
4 of
6)
1st Serve %
57%
(
8 of
14)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
50%
(
1 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
11
Total Points Won
9
|
H2H | |||||
|
17 Oct 2017 R1 |
6
3
6
4
|
W
|
Samuel Groth
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
14
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
18 of
23)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
13 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
47
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Fairfield Challenger | ||||||||
|
10 Oct 2017 R1 |
6
4
3
6
7
5
|
L
|
Noah Rubin
Player
Samuel Groth
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
103)
9
Aces
21
2
Double Faults
12
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
45 of
57)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
19 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
34 of
103)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Jason Jung past matches
|
|
Bratislava Challenger | ||||||||
|
09 Jun 2026 R1 |
6
3
6
1
|
L
|
Zdenek Kolar
Player
Jason Jung
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Wuxi Challenger | ||||||||
|
05 May 2026 R1 |
6
4
6
4
|
L
|
Andre Ilagan
Player
Jason Jung
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Jiujiang Challenger | ||||||||
|
29 Apr 2026 R1 |
6
2
3
6
6
3
|
L
|
Giles Hussey
Player
Jason Jung
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
83%
(
65 of
78)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
35 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
73
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Gwangju Challenger | ||||||||
|
21 Apr 2026 R1 |
6
3
6
4
|
L
|
Hyeon Chung
Player
Jason Jung
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
57
Total Points Won
45
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Kobe Challenger | ||||||||
|
11 Nov 2025 R1 |
1
6
6
3
6
4
|
L
|
Yoshihito Nishioka
Player
Jason Jung
66%
(
56 of
85)
1st Serve %
55%
(
40 of
73)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
39 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
80
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Groth VS Jung matches vs all opponents
| stats | Samuel Groth | Jason Jung |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 53% (199/177) | 58% (308/226) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 52% (471/437) | 57% (698/530) |
| Games Won/Lost | 51% (4747/4531) | 53% (6121/5490) |
| Hard W/L | 53% (199/177) | 58% (308/226) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.6 | 0.22 |
| Total Aces | 2717 | 1270 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 | 0.2 |
| Total Double Faults | 959 | 1150 |
| Average Match Time | 1st Match | 1:9:29 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 931.81 | 792.88 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (8692/14690) | 63% (16864/26939) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 79% (6841/8692) | 68% (11549/16864) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (3000/5996) | 51% (5151/10075) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 33% (309/933) | 41% (1141/2795) |
| Return Points Won % | 32% (4579/14327) | 40% (11029/27605) |
| Slam W/L | 29% (7/17) | 33% (4/8) |
| Masters W/L | 36% (5/9) | 20% (2/8) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/2) | 40% (2/3) |
| Main Tour W/L | 39% (24/37) | 44% (19/24) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 52% (92/84) | 56% (180/140) |
| Futures W/L | 72% (71/27) | 70% (101/43) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (192/355) | 59% (305/517) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 38% (5/13) | 8% (1/12) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 50% (112/225) | 57% (90/159) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 53% (79/149) | 52% (78/150) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (191/152) | 86% (314/270) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (191/38) | 14% (314/44) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (183/45) | 17% (219/37) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Groth VS Jung H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Damm Vs Minaur Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Damm Vs Minaur Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Prozorova Vs Kraus Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Ilkley Open – Ilkley – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Siegemund Vs Anisimova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA The HSBC Championships – London – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Bartunkova Vs Vandewinkel Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Damm Vs Minaur Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Damm Vs Minaur Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Prozorova Vs Kraus Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Ilkley Open – Ilkley – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Siegemund Vs Anisimova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA The HSBC Championships – London – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Bartunkova Vs Vandewinkel Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
