Samuel Groth vs Hugo Di Feo H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Groth VS Feo Head to Head: 1 - 0
The H2H record between Samuel Groth and Hugo Di Feo stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 18-03-2014 in the First Round at the Rimouski Challenger, Groth got the win with 6-1 6-4. Groth stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Feo is no. Ret..
Samuel Groth
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
53 ( 10-08-15)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
Hugo Di Feo
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
896 ( 19-05-14)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
1
Total
0
0
Hard
0
0
Clay
0
1
Indoor
0
0
Grass
0
38 (19-10-1987)
Age
31 (18-04-1995)
193
Height
178
100
Weight
68
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
One-Handed
Backhand
Two-Handed
Billy Heiser
Coach
2006
Turned Pro
57% (387-296)
Career Total W/L
50% (51-51)
53% (199-177)
Career Hard W/L
38% (16-26)
53% (44-39)
Career Clay W/L
71% (25-10)
69% (85-38)
Career Grass W/L
0% (0-0)
58% (59-42)
Career Indoor W/L
40% (10-15)
$650,305
Career Prize Money
$0
0% (0-0)
YTD Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
Groth VS Feo H2H Matches played
|
Rimouski Challenger | ||||||||
|
18 Mar 2014 R1 |
Samuel Groth
Player
Hugo Di Feo
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
16
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6
1
6
4
|
|||||||
Groth VS Feo Head to head matches stats
| stats | Samuel Groth | Hugo Di Feo |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Total Aces | 16 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 1 | 8 |
| Average Match Time | 0:59:22 | 0:59:22 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (36/56) | 56% (27/48) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 72% (26/36) | 59% (16/27) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 60% (12/20) | 43% (9/21) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 57% (4/7) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Pts Won % | 48% (23/48) | 32% (18/56) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Samuel Groth past matches
Before:
|
Australian Open - Melbourne | ||||||||
|
10 Jan 2018 Q1 |
6
4
3
6
7
6
|
L
|
Taylor Fritz
Player
Samuel Groth
59%
(
63 of
107)
1st Serve %
53%
(
55 of
103)
9
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
7
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
38 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
36 of
103)
105
Total Points Won
105
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Brisbane International - Brisbane | ||||||||
|
30 Dec 2017 Q1 |
6
4
7
6
|
L
|
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Samuel Groth
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
10
Aces
21
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
39 of
47)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
14 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
22 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Las Vegas Challenger | ||||||||
|
19 Oct 2017 R2 |
2
1
|
L
|
Jan Choinski
Player
Samuel Groth
67%
(
4 of
6)
1st Serve %
57%
(
8 of
14)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
50%
(
1 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
11
Total Points Won
9
|
H2H | |||||
|
17 Oct 2017 R1 |
6
3
6
4
|
W
|
Samuel Groth
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
14
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
18 of
23)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
13 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
47
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Fairfield Challenger | ||||||||
|
10 Oct 2017 R1 |
6
4
3
6
7
5
|
L
|
Noah Rubin
Player
Samuel Groth
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
103)
9
Aces
21
2
Double Faults
12
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
45 of
57)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
19 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
34 of
103)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Hugo Di Feo past matches
Before:
|
|
Gatineau Challenger | ||||||||
|
16 Jul 2017 Q2 |
6
2
4
6
6
1
|
L
|
Mikael Torpegaard
Player
Hugo Di Feo
52%
(
38 of
73)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
7
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
70
|
H2H | |||||
|
15 Jul 2017 Q1 |
6
4
6
3
|
W
|
Hugo Di Feo
Player
Alexis Galarneau
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Winnipeg Challenger | ||||||||
|
11 Jul 2017 R1 |
6
1
6
1
|
L
|
Bradley Mousley
Player
Hugo Di Feo
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
59%
(
22 of
37)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
H2H | |||||
|
USA F22 (Pittsburgh) | ||||||||
|
30 Jun 2017 QF |
6
3
6
0
|
L
|
Kaichi Uchida
Player
Hugo Di Feo
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
70%
(
28 of
40)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
H2H | |||||
|
29 Jun 2017 R2 |
6
4
|
W
|
Hugo Di Feo
Player
Roy Smith
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve %
63%
(
22 of
35)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
42%
(
13 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
36
Total Points Won
30
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Groth VS Feo matches vs all opponents
| stats | Samuel Groth | Hugo Di Feo |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 53% (199/177) | 38% (16/26) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 52% (471/437) | 42% (39/54) |
| Games Won/Lost | 51% (4747/4531) | 47% (398/447) |
| Hard W/L | 53% (199/177) | 38% (16/26) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.6 | 0.03 |
| Total Aces | 2717 | 11 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 | 0.06 |
| Total Double Faults | 959 | 26 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 932.37 | 1000.71 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (8692/14690) | 64% (256/398) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 79% (6841/8692) | 56% (143/256) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (3000/5996) | 43% (61/142) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 33% (309/933) | 46% (19/41) |
| Return Points Won % | 32% (4579/14327) | 40% (160/403) |
| Slam W/L | 29% (7/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 36% (5/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 39% (24/37) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 52% (92/84) | 40% (4/6) |
| Futures W/L | 72% (71/27) | 38% (12/20) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (192/355) | 39% (16/41) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 38% (5/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 50% (112/225) | 44% (4/9) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 53% (79/149) | 30% (3/10) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (191/152) | 78% (18/14) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (191/38) | 22% (18/4) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (183/45) | 8% (24/2) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Groth VS Feo H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Tomic Vs Walton Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Newport Challenger – 9th July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Mannarino Vs Galarneau Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Newport Challenger – 9th July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Brooksby Vs Maloney Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Newport Challenger – 9th July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Waltert Vs Laboutkova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Nordea Open – Bastad – 8th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Lepchenko Vs Korpatsch Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Nordea Open – Bastad – 8th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Tomic Vs Walton Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Newport Challenger – 9th July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Mannarino Vs Galarneau Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Newport Challenger – 9th July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Brooksby Vs Maloney Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Newport Challenger – 9th July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Waltert Vs Laboutkova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Nordea Open – Bastad – 8th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Lepchenko Vs Korpatsch Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Nordea Open – Bastad – 8th July 2026 (Day 3)
