Ryan Peniston vs Jack Draper H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Peniston VS Draper Head to Head: 2 - 1
The H2H record between Ryan Peniston and Jack Draper stands at 2 - 1. In their last encounter on 23-06-2022 in the Quarterfinals Round at the Viking International - Eastbourne, Peniston got the win with 6-3 6-3. Peniston stands at no. 299 in the rankings, whilst Draper is no. 50.
Ryan Peniston
Ranking
299 ( 15-05-26)
Best Rank
123 ( 18-07-22)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
Jack Draper
Ranking
50 ( 15-05-26)
Best Rank
4 ( 09-06-25)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
1
Main Tour
2
Recent Form
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
2
Total
1
1
Hard
0
0
Clay
0
0
Indoor
0
1
Grass
1
30 (10-11-1995)
Age
24 (22-12-2001)
180
Height
193
75
Weight
85
Left-Handed
Plays
Left-Handed
Two-Handed
Backhand
Two-Handed
Samm Butler
Coach
Jamie Delgado
Turned Pro
2018
61% (367-233)
Career Total W/L
69% (265-119)
66% (222-114)
Career Hard W/L
71% (125-50)
58% (42-31)
Career Clay W/L
60% (36-24)
51% (36-34)
Career Grass W/L
58% (21-15)
55% (67-54)
Career Indoor W/L
73% (83-30)
$263,350
Career Prize Money
$6,257,365
25% (2-6)
YTD Win/Loss
56% (5-4)
Peniston VS Draper H2H Matches played
|
Viking International - Eastbourne | ||||||||
|
23 Jun 2022 QF |
Jack Draper
Player
Ryan Peniston
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
9
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6
3
6
3
|
|||||||
|
|
Surbiton Challenger | ||||||||
|
02 Jun 2022 R2 |
Ryan Peniston
Player
Jack Draper
68%
(
91 of
134)
1st Serve %
56%
(
64 of
115)
7
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
63 of
91)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
46 of
64)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
38%
(
51 of
134)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
46 of
115)
129
Total Points Won
120
|
6
7
7
5
6
4
|
|||||||
|
Las Vegas Challenger | ||||||||
|
14 Oct 2019 R1 |
Ryan Peniston
Player
Jack Draper
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve %
55%
(
52 of
94)
6
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
9
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
23 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
94)
91
Total Points Won
77
|
7
5
7
6
|
|||||||
Peniston VS Draper Head to head matches stats
| stats | Ryan Peniston | Jack Draper |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 3 |
| Games Won | 39 | 39 |
| Total Aces | 15 | 30 |
| Total Double Faults | 4 | 14 |
| Average Match Time | 2:5:56 | 2:5:56 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (174/265) | 58% (149/259) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 67% (116/174) | 72% (108/149) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (45/91) | 45% (49/110) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 37% (10/27) | 31% (10/32) |
| Return Pts Won % | 39% (102/259) | 39% (104/265) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (2/1) | 0% (1/0) |
Ryan Peniston past matches
Before:
|
|
M25 Vila Real de Santo Antonio 2 | ||||||||
|
20 Feb 2026 QF |
6
3
3
0
|
L
|
Max Basing
Player
Ryan Peniston
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve %
63%
(
22 of
35)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
50
Total Points Won
31
|
H2H | |||||
|
19 Feb 2026 R2 |
6
2
6
4
|
W
|
Ryan Peniston
Player
Francisco Rocha
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
H2H | |||||
|
17 Feb 2026 R1 |
6
1
6
3
|
W
|
Ryan Peniston
Player
Rodrigo Alujas
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Tenerife 2 Challenger | ||||||||
|
10 Feb 2026 R1 |
7
6
4
6
6
3
|
L
|
Hynek Barton
Player
Ryan Peniston
50%
(
53 of
107)
1st Serve %
70%
(
68 of
97)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
49 of
68)
56%
(
30 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
38 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
33 of
97)
102
Total Points Won
102
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Manama Challenger | ||||||||
|
27 Jan 2026 R1 |
6
3
6
2
|
L
|
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Ryan Peniston
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Jack Draper past matches
Before:
|
Barcelona Open Banc Sabadell - Barcelona | ||||||||
|
13 Apr 2026 R1 |
3
6
6
3
4
1
|
L
|
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Jack Draper
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
36 of
69)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Miami Open - Miami | ||||||||
|
20 Mar 2026 R2 |
7
6
7
6
|
L
|
Reilly Opelka
Player
Jack Draper
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
25
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
1
87%
(
47 of
54)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
37 of
45)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
15 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
17 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells | ||||||||
|
12 Mar 2026 QF |
6
1
7
5
|
L
|
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Jack Draper
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
H2H | |||||
|
11 Mar 2026 R4 |
4
6
6
4
7
6
|
W
|
Jack Draper
Player
Novak Djokovic
64%
(
66 of
103)
1st Serve %
66%
(
62 of
94)
13
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
38 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
94)
98
Total Points Won
99
|
H2H | |||||
|
09 Mar 2026 R3 |
6
1
7
5
|
W
|
Jack Draper
Player
Francisco Cerundolo
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Peniston VS Draper matches vs all opponents
| stats | Ryan Peniston | Jack Draper |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 66% (222/114) | 71% (125/50) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 63% (479/276) | 68% (284/134) |
| Games Won/Lost | 56% (3862/3018) | 57% (2217/1674) |
| Hard W/L | 66% (222/114) | 71% (125/50) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.2 | 0.57 |
| Total Aces | 656 | 1075 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 | 0.31 |
| Total Double Faults | 810 | 582 |
| Average Match Time | 1:32:22 | 1:41:31 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 604.99 | 462.65 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (11802/19113) | 58% (6749/11543) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 67% (7886/11802) | 75% (5066/6749) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (3716/7311) | 51% (2453/4793) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 44% (1103/2492) | 45% (583/1292) |
| Return Points Won % | 44% (8849/19949) | 41% (4958/12010) |
| Slam W/L | 20% (1/4) | 71% (15/6) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (22/11) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 25% (1/3) | 65% (24/13) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 57% (71/53) | 61% (11/7) |
| Futures W/L | 73% (149/54) | 80% (53/13) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 66% (219/331) | 74% (106/144) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 73% (16/22) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 50% (34/68) | 56% (27/48) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 58% (50/86) | 65% (30/46) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (222/199) | 92% (115/106) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (222/23) | 5% (115/6) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (114/24) | 30% (60/18) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Peniston VS Draper H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Carabelli Vs Berrettini Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Valencia Challenger – 14th May 2026 (Day 4)
-
Zandschulp Vs Halys Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bordeaux Challenger – 14th May 2026 (Day 4)
-
Sierra Vs Yastremska Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Parma Ladies Open – Parma – 14th May 2026 (Day 4)
-
Sierra Vs Yastremska Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Parma Ladies Open – Parma – 14th May 2026 (Day 4)
-
Tabilo Vs Kovacevic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Valencia Challenger – 14th May 2026 (Day 4)
-
Carabelli Vs Berrettini Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Valencia Challenger – 14th May 2026 (Day 4)
-
Zandschulp Vs Halys Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bordeaux Challenger – 14th May 2026 (Day 4)
-
Sierra Vs Yastremska Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Parma Ladies Open – Parma – 14th May 2026 (Day 4)
-
Sierra Vs Yastremska Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Parma Ladies Open – Parma – 14th May 2026 (Day 4)
-
Sierra Vs Yastremska Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Parma Ladies Open – Parma – 14th May 2026 (Day 4)
