Rodrigo Banzer vs Quinn Vandecasteele H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Banzer VS Vandecasteele Head to Head: 1 - 0
The H2H record between Rodrigo Banzer and Quinn Vandecasteele stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 03-03-2020 in the Q3 Round at the M25 Las Vegas 1, Banzer got the win with 6-0 6-4. Banzer stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Vandecasteele is no. 462.
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
902 ( 01-12-14)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
Ranking
462 ( 03-06-26)
Best Rank
449 ( 20-04-26)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Banzer VS Vandecasteele H2H Matches played
|
|
M25 Las Vegas 1 | ||||||||
|
03 Mar 2020 QF |
Rodrigo Banzer
Player
Quinn Vandecasteele
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
41%
(
21 of
51)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6
0
6
4
|
|||||||
Banzer VS Vandecasteele Head to head matches stats
| stats | Rodrigo Banzer | Quinn Vandecasteele |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Total Aces | 2 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 1 | 8 |
| Average Match Time | 1:12:0 | 1:12:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (36/51) | 41% (21/51) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 67% (24/36) | 43% (9/21) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (7/15) | 37% (11/30) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 50% (6/12) | 50% (2/4) |
| Return Pts Won % | 61% (31/51) | 39% (20/51) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Rodrigo Banzer past matches
|
|
M25 Las Vegas 1 | ||||||||
|
04 Mar 2020 R1 |
6
0
6
7
6
3
|
L
|
Alexander Sarkissian
Player
Rodrigo Banzer
60%
(
55 of
92)
1st Serve %
67%
(
59 of
88)
10
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
31 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
88)
103
Total Points Won
77
|
H2H | |||||
|
03 Mar 2020 Q1 |
6
2
7
6
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
03 Mar 2020 QF |
6
0
6
4
|
W
|
Rodrigo Banzer
Player
Quinn Vandecasteele
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
41%
(
21 of
51)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M15 Cancun 4 | ||||||||
|
02 Feb 2020 Q1 |
7
5
6
3
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M15 Cancun 2 | ||||||||
|
21 Jan 2020 Q2 |
7
6
6
4
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
view more
Quinn Vandecasteele past matches
|
|
Tyler Challenger | ||||||||
|
01 Jun 2026 QF |
7
6
6
3
|
L
|
Aidan Kim
Player
Quinn Vandecasteele
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
70)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
31 of
38)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
13 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
H2H | |||||
|
31 May 2026 Q1 |
6
2
6
3
|
W
|
Quinn Vandecasteele
Player
Erik Arutiunian
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
7
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
74
Total Points Won
52
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Little Rock Challenger | ||||||||
|
24 May 2026 Q1 |
6
2
6
4
|
L
|
Erik Arutiunian
Player
Quinn Vandecasteele
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
51
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M15 Vero Beach | ||||||||
|
09 May 2026 SF |
6
4
6
2
|
L
|
Joaquim Almeida
Player
Quinn Vandecasteele
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
26 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
40 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
H2H | |||||
|
08 May 2026 QF |
6
3
6
2
|
W
|
Quinn Vandecasteele
Player
Tristan Mccormick
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Banzer VS Vandecasteele matches vs all opponents
| stats | Rodrigo Banzer | Quinn Vandecasteele |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 64% (16/9) | 57% (83/63) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 63% (34/20) | 56% (189/148) |
| Games Won/Lost | 54% (286/248) | 52% (1701/1540) |
| Hard W/L | 64% (16/9) | 57% (83/63) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.06 | 0.38 |
| Total Aces | 16 | 597 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.07 | 0.27 |
| Total Double Faults | 19 | 428 |
| Average Match Time | 1st Match | 1:20:16 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 754.12 | 475.4 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (240/388) | 54% (4302/7972) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 70% (167/240) | 70% (3013/4302) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (72/148) | 48% (1752/3682) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 37% (15/41) | 42% (369/875) |
| Return Points Won % | 39% (163/413) | 42% (3300/7852) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (26/26) |
| Futures W/L | 63% (15/9) | 61% (57/36) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 65% (15/23) | 55% (78/141) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 73% (8/11) | 59% (19/32) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 50% (3/6) | 44% (21/48) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (15/13) | 84% (83/70) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (15/2) | 16% (83/13) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 30% (10/3) | 19% (63/12) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Banzer VS Vandecasteele H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Maria Vs Fruhvirtova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Birmingham Open – Birmingham – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Walton Vs Wu Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Tyler Challenger – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Trungelliti Vs Shelbayh Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bad Rappenau Challenger – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Hibino Vs Tjen Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Birmingham Open – Birmingham – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Damas Vs Dzumhur Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Prostejov Challenger – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Maria Vs Fruhvirtova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Birmingham Open – Birmingham – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Walton Vs Wu Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Tyler Challenger – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Trungelliti Vs Shelbayh Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bad Rappenau Challenger – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Hibino Vs Tjen Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Birmingham Open – Birmingham – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Damas Vs Dzumhur Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Prostejov Challenger – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)