Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace vs Strong Kirchheimer H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Rodriguez-Pace VS Kirchheimer Head to Head: 3 - 3
The H2H record between Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace and Strong Kirchheimer stands at 3 - 3. In their last encounter on 19-05-2021 in the First Round at the M25 Pensacola 1, Kirchheimer got the win with 6-4 6-3. Rodriguez-Pace stands at no. 854 in the rankings, whilst Kirchheimer is no. 649.
Ranking
854 ( 07-06-26)
Best Rank
282 ( 09-06-14)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
Ranking
649 ( 07-06-26)
Best Rank
375 ( 06-11-23)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
3
3
0
0
3
3
0
0
0
0
Rodriguez-Pace VS Kirchheimer H2H Matches played
|
|
M25 Pensacola 1 | ||||||||
|
19 May 2021 R1 |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
75%
(
55 of
73)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
38 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6
4
6
3
|
|||||||
|
|
M15 Rochester 1 | ||||||||
|
28 Jun 2019 QF |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
69%
(
58 of
84)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
6
4
7
5
|
|||||||
|
|
M15 Orlando 1 | ||||||||
|
22 Jun 2019 SF |
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
77%
(
67 of
87)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
93)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
25 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
93)
98
Total Points Won
82
|
4
6
6
2
7
6
|
|||||||
|
|
M25 Pensacola 1 | ||||||||
|
08 May 2019 R1 |
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6
3
6
4
|
|||||||
|
|
USA F29 (Birmingham) | ||||||||
|
04 Nov 2018 F |
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
75%
(
57 of
76)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
88)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
7
6
6
4
|
|||||||
|
|
USA F3 (Naples) | ||||||||
|
12 Jan 2018 QF |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
9
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
26 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
86
Total Points Won
75
|
6
3
4
6
6
3
|
|||||||
Rodriguez-Pace VS Kirchheimer Head to head matches stats
| stats | Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace | Strong Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 3 | 3 |
| Sets Won | 7 | 7 |
| Games Won | 70 | 72 |
| Total Aces | 20 | 29 |
| Total Double Faults | 10 | 13 |
| Average Match Time | 2:9:20 | 2:9:20 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (320/468) | 67% (289/433) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 68% (217/320) | 67% (194/289) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (71/148) | 51% (74/144) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 37% (15/41) | 40% (18/45) |
| Return Pts Won % | 38% (165/433) | 38% (180/468) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (3/6) | 50% (3/6) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) | 75% (4/3) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) | 25% (4/1) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (4/1) | 0% (2/0) |
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace past matches
|
|
M15 La Paz 1 | ||||||||
|
27 Nov 2025 R2 |
6
3
6
3
|
L
|
Thiago Agustin Pernas
Player
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
73%
(
47 of
64)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
H2H | |||||
|
26 Nov 2025 R1 |
6
0
6
4
|
W
|
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
Player
Eugenio Almeida Junior
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M25 Cochabamba 1 | ||||||||
|
19 Nov 2025 R1 |
6
4
6
4
|
L
|
Matteo Covato
Player
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
7
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
89%
(
33 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
5 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M15 Valledupar 1 | ||||||||
|
03 Nov 2025 R1 |
6
4
3
6
7
5
|
L
|
Salvador Price
Player
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
65%
(
62 of
96)
1st Serve %
68%
(
72 of
106)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
48%
(
46 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
55 of
106)
105
Total Points Won
97
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M15 Ibague 1 | ||||||||
|
28 Oct 2025 R1 |
4
6
6
2
6
4
|
L
|
Nicolas Garcia Longo
Player
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
60%
(
56 of
93)
1st Serve %
68%
(
63 of
93)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
8
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
44%
(
41 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
93)
97
Total Points Won
89
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Strong Kirchheimer past matches
|
|
M15 Vero Beach | ||||||||
|
06 May 2026 R1 |
3
6
6
2
7
6
|
L
|
Joaquim Almeida
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
77%
(
69 of
90)
1st Serve %
50%
(
50 of
100)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
19 of
50)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
40 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
50 of
100)
100
Total Points Won
90
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Savannah Challenger | ||||||||
|
19 Apr 2026 Q1 |
7
6
1
6
6
2
|
L
|
Braden Shick
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
51 of
85)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
23 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
85)
81
Total Points Won
78
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Tallahassee Challenger | ||||||||
|
12 Apr 2026 Q1 |
6
0
6
4
|
L
|
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Sarasota Challenger | ||||||||
|
08 Apr 2026 R2 |
6
3
6
2
|
L
|
Daniil Glinka
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
51%
(
22 of
43)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
H2H | |||||
|
07 Apr 2026 R1 |
4
6
7
5
7
6
|
W
|
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Thomas Faurel
70%
(
71 of
101)
1st Serve %
84%
(
85 of
101)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
52 of
85)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
101)
103
Total Points Won
99
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Rodriguez-Pace VS Kirchheimer matches vs all opponents
| stats | Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace | Strong Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 63% (259/153) | 53% (175/155) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 61% (569/362) | 54% (413/354) |
| Games Won/Lost | 55% (4676/3823) | 52% (3825/3524) |
| Hard W/L | 63% (259/153) | 53% (175/155) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.12 | 0.31 |
| Total Aces | 496 | 1098 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.08 | 0.17 |
| Total Double Faults | 353 | 626 |
| Average Match Time | 1st Match | 1:30:21 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 842.38 | 669.02 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (9409/13754) | 64% (11931/18652) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 65% (6158/9409) | 69% (8237/11931) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (2172/4345) | 52% (3521/6721) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 45% (659/1479) | 38% (698/1859) |
| Return Points Won % | 41% (5728/13946) | 38% (7365/19168) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 78% (18/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 40% (4/6) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 65% (11/6) | 42% (48/66) |
| Futures W/L | 62% (230/141) | 60% (123/83) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (244/390) | 53% (172/323) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (10/15) | 33% (1/3) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 58% (61/105) | 47% (48/102) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 52% (48/92) | 42% (45/108) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 94% (244/229) | 79% (191/150) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 6% (244/15) | 21% (191/40) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (168/30) | 18% (139/25) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Rodriguez-Pace VS Kirchheimer H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Inglis Vs Parks Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA The HSBC Championships – London – 6th June 2026 (Day -1)
-
Bonzi Vs Polmans Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 6th June 2026 (Day -1)
-
Virtanen Vs Majchrzak Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Birmingham Challenger – 6th June 2026 (Day 6)
-
Virtanen Vs Majchrzak Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Birmingham Challenger – 6th June 2026 (Day 6)
-
Maria Vs Miyazaki Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA The HSBC Championships – London – 6th June 2026 (Day -1)
-
Inglis Vs Parks Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA The HSBC Championships – London – 6th June 2026 (Day -1)
-
Bonzi Vs Polmans Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 6th June 2026 (Day -1)
-
Virtanen Vs Majchrzak Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Birmingham Challenger – 6th June 2026 (Day 6)
-
Virtanen Vs Majchrzak Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Birmingham Challenger – 6th June 2026 (Day 6)
-
Maria Vs Miyazaki Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA The HSBC Championships – London – 6th June 2026 (Day -1)
