Ricardo Hocevar vs Matt Reid H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Hocevar VS Reid Head to Head: 1 - 1
The H2H record between Ricardo Hocevar and Matt Reid stands at 1 - 1. In their last encounter on 09-01-2013 in the Q1 round Round at the Australian Open - Melbourne, Reid got the win with 6-2 6-4. Hocevar stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Reid is no. Ret..
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
149 ( 15-06-09)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
183 ( 03-02-14)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
Hocevar VS Reid H2H Matches played
|
|
Australian Open - Melbourne | ||||||||
|
09 Jan 2013 Q1 |
Matt Reid
Player
Ricardo Hocevar
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
7
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6
2
6
4
|
|||||||
|
|
Santos Challenger | ||||||||
|
17 Apr 2012 R1 |
Ricardo Hocevar
Player
Matt Reid
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
9
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
52
|
6
3
7
5
|
|||||||
Hocevar VS Reid Head to head matches stats
| stats | Ricardo Hocevar | Matt Reid |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 19 | 20 |
| Total Aces | 8 | 10 |
| Total Double Faults | 3 | 11 |
| Average Match Time | 1:11:17 | 1:11:17 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (72/114) | 52% (50/97) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 64% (46/72) | 82% (41/50) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (20/42) | 47% (22/47) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 71% (5/7) | 75% (6/8) |
| Return Pts Won % | 34% (34/99) | 41% (48/116) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Ricardo Hocevar past matches
|
|
Argentina F7 (Buenos Aires) | ||||||||
|
12 Sep 2017 R1 |
6
0
7
6
|
L
|
Juan Ignacio Ameal
Player
Ricardo Hocevar
88%
(
53 of
60)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
29%
(
2 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Belgium F8 (Eupen) | ||||||||
|
07 Aug 2017 R1 |
7
5
6
0
|
L
|
Colin Van Beem
Player
Ricardo Hocevar
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Belgium F7 (Brussels) | ||||||||
|
04 Aug 2017 QF |
7
6
2
6
7
6
|
L
|
Yannick Vandenbulcke
Player
Ricardo Hocevar
55%
(
56 of
101)
1st Serve %
65%
(
75 of
116)
0
Aces
3
12
Double Faults
4
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
50 of
75)
40%
(
18 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
39%
(
39 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
48 of
116)
110
Total Points Won
107
|
H2H | |||||
|
03 Aug 2017 R2 |
3
6
6
4
6
4
|
W
|
Ricardo Hocevar
Player
Joffrey De Schepper
67%
(
58 of
86)
1st Serve %
76%
(
65 of
86)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
40 of
65)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
83
|
H2H | |||||
|
01 Aug 2017 R1 |
6
3
3
6
7
6
|
W
|
Ricardo Hocevar
Player
Juan Carlos Saez
59%
(
69 of
117)
1st Serve %
58%
(
69 of
119)
5
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
6
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
47 of
69)
56%
(
27 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
38%
(
45 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
50 of
119)
122
Total Points Won
114
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Matt Reid past matches
|
|
All Lower level tournaments | ||||||||
|
11 Aug 2020 R1 |
6
3
7
6
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
10 Aug 2020 R1 |
5
7
6
4
10
7
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
30 Jun 2020 R1 |
3
2
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Noumea Challenger | ||||||||
|
31 Dec 2018 QF |
6
4
6
2
|
L
|
Andre Goransson
Player
Matt Reid
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
43%
(
25 of
58)
7
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
13
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Nottingham Challenger | ||||||||
|
11 Jun 2018 QF |
7
5
6
1
|
L
|
Brayden Schnur
Player
Matt Reid
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
50%
(
31 of
62)
13
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Hocevar VS Reid matches vs all opponents
| stats | Ricardo Hocevar | Matt Reid |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 59% (115/81) | 53% (185/162) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 56% (258/199) | 53% (420/379) |
| Games Won/Lost | 52% (2289/2124) | 51% (3960/3833) |
| Hard W/L | 59% (115/81) | 53% (185/162) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.16 | 0.33 |
| Total Aces | 353 | 1238 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.08 | 0.2 |
| Total Double Faults | 181 | 763 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 1070.64 | 1039.23 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (2968/4915) | 57% (6777/11970) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 72% (2137/2968) | 73% (4954/6777) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (965/1947) | 48% (2482/5193) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 36% (140/392) | 38% (337/898) |
| Return Points Won % | 36% (1725/4839) | 34% (3992/11601) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (6/6) | 18% (2/9) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/3) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (2/2) | 26% (5/14) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 47% (41/46) | 48% (80/87) |
| Futures W/L | 72% (66/26) | 67% (98/49) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (112/191) | 53% (180/341) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 50% (38/76) | 54% (69/128) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 54% (34/63) | 50% (56/112) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (111/95) | 82% (194/159) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (111/16) | 18% (194/35) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (84/19) | 16% (153/25) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Hocevar VS Reid H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Dzumhur Vs Arnaldi Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Plava Laguna Croatia Open – Umag – 16th July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Korneeva Vs Li Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Athens Open – Athens – 16th July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Faria Vs Ruud Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP EFG Swiss Open – Gstaad – 16th July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Hontama Vs Parks Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Athens Open – Athens – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Vandewinkel Vs Falkowska Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Enka Open – Istanbul – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Dzumhur Vs Arnaldi Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Plava Laguna Croatia Open – Umag – 16th July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Korneeva Vs Li Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Athens Open – Athens – 16th July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Faria Vs Ruud Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP EFG Swiss Open – Gstaad – 16th July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Hontama Vs Parks Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Athens Open – Athens – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Vandewinkel Vs Falkowska Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Enka Open – Istanbul – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
