Ramkumar Ramanathan vs Botic Van De Zandschulp H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Ramanathan VS Zandschulp Head to Head: 1 - 1
The H2H record between Ramkumar Ramanathan and Botic Van De Zandschulp stands at 1 - 1. In their last encounter on 21-10-2020 in the Second Round at the Ismaning Challenger, Zandschulp got the win with 6-2 6-2. Ramanathan stands at no. 629 in the rankings, whilst Zandschulp is no. 52.
Ramkumar Ramanathan
Ranking
629 ( 26-06-26)
Best Rank
111 ( 30-07-18)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Ranking
52 ( 26-06-26)
Best Rank
22 ( 29-08-22)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
1
Total
1
0
Hard
0
0
Clay
0
1
Indoor
1
0
Grass
0
31 (08-11-1994)
Age
30 (04-10-1995)
188
Height
191
81
Weight
85
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Two-Handed
Backhand
Two-Handed
Juan Balcells,Emilio Sanchez Viccario
Coach
Peter Lucassen, Fred Hemmes
2009
Turned Pro
2016
52% (446-409)
Career Total W/L
60% (395-260)
56% (295-228)
Career Hard W/L
57% (78-59)
44% (78-100)
Career Clay W/L
61% (184-116)
53% (31-27)
Career Grass W/L
43% (13-17)
44% (42-54)
Career Indoor W/L
64% (120-68)
$439,635
Career Prize Money
$4,275,720
33% (1-2)
YTD Win/Loss
48% (13-14)
Zandschulp upcoming match (29-06-26)
Ramanathan VS Zandschulp H2H Matches played
|
Ismaning Challenger | ||||||||
|
21 Oct 2020 R2 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Ramkumar Ramanathan
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6
2
6
2
|
|||||||
|
Glasgow Challenger | ||||||||
|
19 Sep 2019 R3 |
Ramkumar Ramanathan
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
49%
(
19 of
39)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
7
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6
4
6
1
|
|||||||
Ramanathan VS Zandschulp Head to head matches stats
| stats | Ramkumar Ramanathan | Botic Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 16 | 17 |
| Total Aces | 10 | 11 |
| Total Double Faults | 6 | 4 |
| Average Match Time | 0:55:39 | 0:55:39 |
| 1st Serve % | 49% (41/83) | 61% (57/94) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 73% (30/41) | 75% (43/57) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 57% (24/42) | 46% (17/37) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 57% (4/7) | 67% (4/6) |
| Return Pts Won % | 36% (34/94) | 35% (29/83) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Ramkumar Ramanathan past matches
Before:
|
New Delhi Challenger | ||||||||
|
16 Feb 2026 QF |
6
2
6
2
|
L
|
Hyeon Chung
Player
Ramkumar Ramanathan
47%
(
21 of
45)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
H2H | |||||
|
15 Feb 2026 Q1 |
6
1
6
3
|
W
|
Ramkumar Ramanathan
Player
Tsung-Hao Huang
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Bengaluru Challenger | ||||||||
|
04 Jan 2026 Q1 |
7
5
7
6
|
L
|
Arthur Reymond
Player
Ramkumar Ramanathan
47%
(
34 of
72)
1st Serve %
55%
(
47 of
85)
11
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
20 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
85)
82
Total Points Won
75
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Yokohama Challenger | ||||||||
|
15 Nov 2025 Q1 |
7
5
6
4
|
L
|
Michael Vrbensky
Player
Ramkumar Ramanathan
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
71%
(
50 of
70)
10
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Seoul Challenger | ||||||||
|
26 Oct 2025 Q1 |
6
1
7
6
|
L
|
Yusuke Takahashi
Player
Ramkumar Ramanathan
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
51
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Botic Van De Zandschulp past matches
Before:
|
HSBC Championships - London | ||||||||
|
18 Jun 2026 R2 |
7
6
6
3
|
L
|
Tommy Paul
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
89)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
H2H | |||||
|
15 Jun 2026 R1 |
6
4
7
6
|
W
|
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Harry Wendelken
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
85)
8
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
82%
(
42 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
30%
(
22 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Libema Open - 's-Hertogenbosch | ||||||||
|
10 Jun 2026 R1 |
6
2
6
7
6
4
|
L
|
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
66%
(
69 of
104)
1st Serve %
67%
(
67 of
100)
8
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
42 of
67)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
38 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
100)
110
Total Points Won
94
|
H2H | |||||
|
French Open - Paris | ||||||||
|
25 May 2026 R1 |
6
3
6
4
6
7
6
4
|
L
|
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
61%
(
92 of
152)
1st Serve %
59%
(
93 of
157)
5
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
9
68%
(
63 of
92)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
64 of
93)
48%
(
29 of
60)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
39%
(
60 of
152)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
66 of
157)
158
Total Points Won
151
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Bordeaux Challenger | ||||||||
|
15 May 2026 R2 |
6
1
2
0
|
L
|
Quentin Halys
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
54%
(
13 of
24)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
36%
(
14 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
40
Total Points Won
23
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Ramanathan VS Zandschulp matches vs all opponents
| stats | Ramkumar Ramanathan | Botic Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 56% (295/228) | 57% (78/59) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 55% (667/540) | 53% (185/167) |
| Games Won/Lost | 52% (6093/5562) | 51% (1752/1684) |
| Hard W/L | 56% (295/228) | 57% (78/59) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.49 | 0.51 |
| Total Aces | 2789 | 853 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 | 0.35 |
| Total Double Faults | 1390 | 594 |
| Average Match Time | 1:7:45 | 1:56:59 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 769.73 | 295.44 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (15285/26099) | 62% (6601/10720) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 74% (11317/15285) | 72% (4767/6601) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (5502/10814) | 47% (1956/4119) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 40% (846/2126) | 43% (408/949) |
| Return Points Won % | 36% (9166/25592) | 38% (4215/10964) |
| Slam W/L | 32% (6/13) | 61% (19/12) |
| Masters W/L | 38% (6/10) | 48% (15/16) |
| Cups W/L | 67% (6/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 48% (25/27) | 57% (33/25) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 41% (82/116) | 64% (7/4) |
| Futures W/L | 74% (170/59) | 67% (4/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (287/511) | 57% (64/112) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 71% (5/7) | 52% (12/23) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 47% (92/195) | 56% (31/55) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 52% (82/157) | 64% (30/47) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (281/240) | 87% (67/58) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (281/40) | 13% (67/9) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (242/55) | 29% (70/20) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Ramanathan VS Zandschulp H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Maria Vs Ostapenko Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Eastbourne Open – Eastbourne – 26th June 2026 (Day 5)
-
Draper Vs Diallo Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Lexus Eastbourne Open – Eastbourne – 25th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Dimitrov Vs Fokina Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Mallorca Championships – Mallorca – 25th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Muchova Vs Tauson Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Bad Homburg Open – Bad Homburg – 25th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Kessler Vs Keys Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Eastbourne Open – Eastbourne – 25th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Maria Vs Ostapenko Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Eastbourne Open – Eastbourne – 26th June 2026 (Day 5)
-
Draper Vs Diallo Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Lexus Eastbourne Open – Eastbourne – 25th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Dimitrov Vs Fokina Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Mallorca Championships – Mallorca – 25th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Muchova Vs Tauson Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Bad Homburg Open – Bad Homburg – 25th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Kessler Vs Keys Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Eastbourne Open – Eastbourne – 25th June 2026 (Day 4)
