Philip Henning vs Nathan Ponwith H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Henning VS Ponwith Head to Head: 1 - 0
The H2H record between Philip Henning and Nathan Ponwith stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 18-11-2021 in the Second Round at the M25 Austin 1, Henning got the win with 6-7(2) 7-5 6-2. Henning stands at no. 306 in the rankings, whilst Ponwith is no. 874.
Ranking
306 ( 23-04-26)
Best Rank
300 ( 13-04-26)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
Ranking
874 ( 23-04-26)
Best Rank
367 ( 12-06-23)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Henning VS Ponwith H2H Matches played
|
|
M25 Austin 1 | ||||||||
|
18 Nov 2021 R2 |
Philip Henning
Player
Nathan Ponwith
72%
(
81 of
112)
1st Serve %
61%
(
67 of
110)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
45 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
46 of
110)
113
Total Points Won
109
|
6
7
7
5
6
2
|
|||||||
Henning VS Ponwith Head to head matches stats
| stats | Philip Henning | Nathan Ponwith |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 19 | 14 |
| Total Aces | 8 | 1 |
| Total Double Faults | 1 | 3 |
| Average Match Time | 3:19:0 | 3:19:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 72% (81/112) | 61% (67/110) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 65% (53/81) | 60% (40/67) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (14/31) | 56% (24/43) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 35% (6/17) | 50% (3/6) |
| Return Pts Won % | 42% (46/110) | 40% (45/112) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Philip Henning past matches
|
|
Rome Challenger | ||||||||
|
19 Apr 2026 Q1 |
3
6
6
4
7
6
|
L
|
David Jorda Sanchis
Player
Philip Henning
66%
(
59 of
89)
1st Serve %
72%
(
84 of
117)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
55 of
84)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
47 of
117)
106
Total Points Won
100
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M25 Santa Margherita di Pula | ||||||||
|
17 Apr 2026 SF |
6
2
6
3
|
L
|
Moise Kouame
Player
Philip Henning
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
48
|
H2H | |||||
|
17 Apr 2026 QF |
6
3
7
6
|
W
|
Philip Henning
Player
Marvin Moeller
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
96)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
13 of
41)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
37 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
49 of
96)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
H2H | |||||
|
15 Apr 2026 R2 |
6
3
6
4
|
W
|
Philip Henning
Player
Nicholas David Ionel
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
46%
(
25 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
H2H | |||||
|
13 Apr 2026 R1 |
6
2
6
2
|
W
|
Philip Henning
Player
Andrea De Marchi
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Nathan Ponwith past matches
|
|
M25 Las Vegas 1 | ||||||||
|
23 Mar 2026 Q2 |
6
7
6
1
14
12
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M25 Bakersfield 1 | ||||||||
|
19 Mar 2026 R2 |
6
7
6
2
6
2
|
L
|
Branko Djuric
Player
Nathan Ponwith
53%
(
53 of
100)
1st Serve %
71%
(
72 of
102)
16
Aces
0
14
Double Faults
5
92%
(
49 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
72)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
28%
(
28 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
40 of
102)
112
Total Points Won
90
|
H2H | |||||
|
18 Mar 2026 R1 |
4
6
6
3
7
5
|
W
|
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Jacob Brumm
62%
(
63 of
102)
1st Serve %
70%
(
72 of
103)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
48 of
72)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
36%
(
37 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
103)
108
Total Points Won
97
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Phoenix Challenger | ||||||||
|
09 Mar 2026 Q1 |
7
5
6
4
|
L
|
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Nathan Ponwith
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
79)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
79)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M15 San Jose 1 | ||||||||
|
23 Feb 2026 QF |
6
3
5
2
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
view more
Henning VS Ponwith matches vs all opponents
| stats | Philip Henning | Nathan Ponwith |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 79% (119/31) | 53% (144/128) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 75% (254/83) | 52% (326/304) |
| Games Won/Lost | 61% (1829/1185) | 51% (3023/2958) |
| Hard W/L | 79% (119/31) | 53% (144/128) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.29 | 0.2 |
| Total Aces | 420 | 574 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 | 0.27 |
| Total Double Faults | 170 | 798 |
| Average Match Time | 1:33:1 | 1:25:51 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 504.14 | 577.22 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (5589/8519) | 58% (8465/14584) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 71% (3975/5589) | 66% (5623/8465) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 57% (1682/2930) | 50% (3058/6119) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 48% (531/1107) | 40% (550/1381) |
| Return Points Won % | 44% (4131/9320) | 38% (5436/14148) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (13/13) | 27% (13/36) |
| Futures W/L | 85% (105/18) | 59% (131/92) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 80% (119/149) | 53% (144/271) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 55% (17/31) | 50% (36/72) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 58% (21/36) | 56% (48/85) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 95% (115/109) | 81% (145/118) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 5% (115/6) | 19% (145/27) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 29% (35/10) | 20% (127/26) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Henning VS Ponwith H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
McNally Vs Volynets Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Mutua Madrid Open – Madrid – 22nd April 2026 (Day 3)
-
Zarazua Vs Karatancheva Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA W100 Charlottesville – 22nd April 2026 (Day 3)
-
Faria Vs Hurkacz Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Mutua Madrid Open – Madrid – 22nd April 2026 (Day 3)
-
Oliynykova Vs Waltert Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Mutua Madrid Open – Madrid – 22nd April 2026 (Day 3)
-
Jodar Vs Jong Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Mutua Madrid Open – Madrid – 22nd April 2026 (Day 3)
-
McNally Vs Volynets Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Mutua Madrid Open – Madrid – 22nd April 2026 (Day 3)
-
Zarazua Vs Karatancheva Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA W100 Charlottesville – 22nd April 2026 (Day 3)
-
Faria Vs Hurkacz Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Mutua Madrid Open – Madrid – 22nd April 2026 (Day 3)
-
Oliynykova Vs Waltert Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Mutua Madrid Open – Madrid – 22nd April 2026 (Day 3)
-
Jodar Vs Jong Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Mutua Madrid Open – Madrid – 22nd April 2026 (Day 3)