Peter Polansky vs James Mcgee H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Polansky VS Mcgee Head to Head: 2 - 1
The H2H record between Peter Polansky and James Mcgee stands at 2 - 1. In their last encounter on 14-07-2016 in the Second Round at the Winnipeg Challenger, Polansky got the win with 6-4 6-1. Polansky stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Mcgee is no. Ret..
Peter Polansky
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
110 ( 25-06-18)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
James Mcgee
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
146 ( 22-06-15)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
2
Total
1
2
Hard
0
0
Clay
0
0
Indoor
1
0
Grass
0
37 (15-06-1988)
Age
38 (10-06-1987)
183
Height
183
80
Weight
80
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Two-Handed
Backhand
Two-Handed
Coach
Jeff Salzenstein
2007
Turned Pro
56% (541-428)
Career Total W/L
57% (337-255)
57% (306-227)
Career Hard W/L
61% (156-101)
53% (132-118)
Career Clay W/L
56% (101-78)
34% (11-21)
Career Grass W/L
48% (12-13)
60% (92-62)
Career Indoor W/L
52% (68-63)
$541,225
Career Prize Money
$95,404
0% (0-0)
YTD Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
Polansky VS Mcgee H2H Matches played
|
Winnipeg Challenger | ||||||||
|
14 Jul 2016 R2 |
Peter Polansky
Player
James Mcgee
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6
4
6
1
|
|||||||
|
|
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells | ||||||||
|
08 Mar 2016 Q1 |
Peter Polansky
Player
James Mcgee
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
51 of
81)
0
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
7
6
6
2
|
|||||||
|
Rimouski Challenger | ||||||||
|
18 Mar 2013 R1 |
James Mcgee
Player
Peter Polansky
51%
(
36 of
71)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
6
4
6
4
|
|||||||
Polansky VS Mcgee Head to head matches stats
| stats | Peter Polansky | James Mcgee |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 2 |
| Games Won | 33 | 25 |
| Total Aces | 4 | 14 |
| Total Double Faults | 3 | 11 |
| Average Match Time | 1:18:56 | 1:18:56 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (116/185) | 59% (116/197) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 69% (80/116) | 65% (75/116) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (35/69) | 43% (35/81) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 43% (10/23) | 44% (7/16) |
| Return Pts Won % | 44% (87/197) | 38% (70/185) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Peter Polansky past matches
Before:
|
|
National Bank Open - Toronto | ||||||||
|
05 Aug 2023 Q1 |
6
2
6
4
|
L
|
Max Purcell
Player
Peter Polansky
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
10
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Citi Open - Washington | ||||||||
|
29 Jul 2023 Q1 |
6
2
6
0
|
L
|
Thai Kwiatkowski
Player
Peter Polansky
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
H2H | |||||
|
Infosys Hall of Fame Open - Newport | ||||||||
|
16 Jul 2023 Q1 |
6
2
7
5
|
L
|
Skander Mansouri
Player
Peter Polansky
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M25 Cancun 1 | ||||||||
|
08 Feb 2022 R1 |
5
5
|
L
|
Michail Pervolarakis
Player
Peter Polansky
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve %
50%
(
16 of
32)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
11 of
16)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
38%
(
10 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
27
Total Points Won
31
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Cleveland Challenger | ||||||||
|
30 Jan 2022 Q1 |
6
3
7
6
|
L
|
Roberto Quiroz
Player
Peter Polansky
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
20 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
20 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
H2H | |||||
view more
James Mcgee past matches
Before:
|
|
U.S. Open - New York | ||||||||
|
22 Aug 2017 Q1 |
6
2
1
0
|
L
|
Christian Harrison
Player
James Mcgee
58%
(
15 of
26)
1st Serve %
52%
(
13 of
25)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
87%
(
13 of
15)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
6 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
32
Total Points Won
19
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Rogers Cup - Montreal | ||||||||
|
06 Aug 2017 QF |
6
4
6
4
|
L
|
Norbert Gombos
Player
James Mcgee
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
80)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
H2H | |||||
|
05 Aug 2017 Q1 |
7
6
6
3
|
W
|
James Mcgee
Player
Philip Bester
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
45%
(
29 of
64)
4
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
5
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
29 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Lexington Challenger | ||||||||
|
03 Aug 2017 R2 |
3
6
6
3
6
4
|
L
|
Daniel Nguyen
Player
James Mcgee
62%
(
58 of
93)
1st Serve %
57%
(
42 of
74)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
35%
(
33 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
22 of
74)
82
Total Points Won
85
|
H2H | |||||
|
31 Jul 2017 R1 |
6
1
2
6
7
6
|
W
|
James Mcgee
Player
Christopher Rungkat
48%
(
44 of
91)
1st Serve %
51%
(
44 of
86)
7
Aces
0
15
Double Faults
6
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
38%
(
18 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
42%
(
38 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
85
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Polansky VS Mcgee matches vs all opponents
| stats | Peter Polansky | James Mcgee |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 57% (306/227) | 61% (156/101) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 56% (705/544) | 59% (347/244) |
| Games Won/Lost | 52% (6328/5772) | 54% (2955/2568) |
| Hard W/L | 57% (306/227) | 61% (156/101) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.31 | 0.27 |
| Total Aces | 1807 | 717 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 | 0.21 |
| Total Double Faults | 1088 | 573 |
| Average Match Time | 1:4:17 | 1st Match |
| Average Opponent Rank | 837.47 | 956.48 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (16315/28225) | 60% (6187/10300) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 70% (11478/16315) | 70% (4323/6187) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (6307/11910) | 49% (2019/4113) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 40% (1050/2634) | 44% (455/1044) |
| Return Points Won % | 38% (10801/28309) | 40% (4062/10095) |
| Slam W/L | 56% (34/27) | 57% (8/6) |
| Masters W/L | 38% (18/30) | 38% (3/5) |
| Cups W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/2) |
| Main Tour W/L | 39% (12/19) | 40% (4/6) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 55% (158/130) | 60% (76/51) |
| Futures W/L | 80% (82/20) | 68% (65/31) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (299/514) | 61% (155/253) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 18% (2/11) | 0% (0/2) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 51% (102/200) | 51% (33/65) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 49% (87/176) | 55% (41/75) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (300/257) | 88% (147/129) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (300/43) | 12% (147/18) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (232/47) | 24% (110/26) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Polansky VS Mcgee H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Maria Vs Fruhvirtova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Birmingham Open – Birmingham – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Walton Vs Wu Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Tyler Challenger – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Trungelliti Vs Shelbayh Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bad Rappenau Challenger – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Hibino Vs Tjen Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Birmingham Open – Birmingham – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Hibino Vs Tjen Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Birmingham Open – Birmingham – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Maria Vs Fruhvirtova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Birmingham Open – Birmingham – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Walton Vs Wu Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Tyler Challenger – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Trungelliti Vs Shelbayh Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bad Rappenau Challenger – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Hibino Vs Tjen Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Birmingham Open – Birmingham – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Damas Vs Dzumhur Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Prostejov Challenger – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
