Parth Aggarwal vs Shourya Manik H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Aggarwal VS Manik Head to Head: 1 - 0
The H2H record between Parth Aggarwal and Shourya Manik stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 03-08-2025 in the Q1 round Round at the M15 Singapore 1, Aggarwal got the win with 6-3 6-3. Aggarwal stands at no. - in the rankings, whilst Manik is no. -.
Parth Aggarwal
Ranking
- ( 16-07-26)
Best Rank
( 01-01-70)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
Shourya Manik
Ranking
- ( 16-07-26)
Best Rank
( 01-01-70)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
1
Total
0
0
Hard
0
0
Clay
0
1
Indoor
0
0
Grass
0
28 (22-12-1997)
Age
23 (11-12-2002)
170
Height
65
Weight
Right-Handed
Plays
Two-Handed
Backhand
Coach
Turned Pro
36% (73-128)
Career Total W/L
17% (4-19)
32% (44-92)
Career Hard W/L
6% (1-15)
48% (27-29)
Career Clay W/L
50% (2-2)
0% (0-0)
Career Grass W/L
0% (0-0)
22% (2-7)
Career Indoor W/L
33% (1-2)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
46% (11-13)
YTD Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
Aggarwal VS Manik H2H Matches played
|
M15 Singapore 1 | ||||||||
|
03 Aug 2025 Q1 |
Parth Aggarwal
Player
Shourya Manik
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
10
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6
3
6
3
|
|||||||
Aggarwal VS Manik Head to head matches stats
| stats | Parth Aggarwal | Shourya Manik |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Total Aces | 10 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 4 | 2 |
| Average Match Time | 1:24:43 | 1:24:43 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (31/51) | 61% (37/61) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 74% (23/31) | 57% (21/37) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 60% (12/20) | 42% (10/24) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 36% (4/11) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Pts Won % | 49% (30/61) | 31% (16/51) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Parth Aggarwal past matches
Before:
|
M25 Rabat | ||||||||
|
02 Jul 2026 R1 |
6
1
6
0
|
L
|
Sean Cuenin
Player
Parth Aggarwal
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve %
52%
(
15 of
29)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
87%
(
13 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
51
Total Points Won
16
|
H2H | |||||
|
30 Jun 2026 QF |
7
6
6
3
|
W
|
Parth Aggarwal
Player
Idriss Haddouch
54%
(
45 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
34 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
82
Total Points Won
73
|
H2H | |||||
|
29 Jun 2026 Q2 |
6
1
6
2
|
W
|
Parth Aggarwal
Player
Loris Gander
48%
(
19 of
40)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
58%
(
11 of
19)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
17 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M25 Tanger | ||||||||
|
24 Jun 2026 R1 |
6
1
6
1
|
L
|
Florian Broska
Player
Parth Aggarwal
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
59%
(
23 of
39)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
55
Total Points Won
23
|
H2H | |||||
|
Bengaluru 2 Challenger | ||||||||
|
11 May 2026 QF |
6
2
6
1
|
L
|
Ronit Karki
Player
Parth Aggarwal
47%
(
25 of
53)
1st Serve %
42%
(
20 of
48)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
7
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
15 of
20)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
5 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Shourya Manik past matches
Before:
|
|
M25 Bhopal 2 | ||||||||
|
23 Nov 2025 Q1 |
6
1
6
1
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M15 Bhubaneswar 1 | ||||||||
|
16 Nov 2025 Q1 |
6
3
7
5
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M25 Nakhon Pathom 1 | ||||||||
|
31 Aug 2025 Q1 |
6
3
3
6
10
8
|
L
|
Phopthum Sriwong
Player
Shourya Manik
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
46%
(
29 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
66
Total Points Won
66
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M15 Hong Kong 1 | ||||||||
|
25 Aug 2025 Q1 |
6
0
6
2
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M15 Singapore 2 | ||||||||
|
11 Aug 2025 QF |
3
6
6
1
10
5
|
L
|
Tzu Li Chang
Player
Shourya Manik
48%
(
24 of
50)
1st Serve %
70%
(
47 of
67)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Aggarwal VS Manik matches vs all opponents
| stats | Parth Aggarwal | Shourya Manik |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 32% (44/92) | 6% (1/15) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 36% (113/199) | 9% (3/31) |
| Games Won/Lost | 45% (1392/1684) | 34% (107/204) |
| Hard W/L | 32% (44/92) | 6% (1/15) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.09 | 0.04 |
| Total Aces | 135 | 6 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 | 0.08 |
| Total Double Faults | 344 | 13 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 445.94 | 264.75 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (2563/4528) | 60% (219/362) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 63% (1612/2563) | 55% (121/219) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (857/1965) | 43% (62/143) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 44% (181/412) | 50% (11/22) |
| Return Points Won % | 39% (1714/4409) | 35% (104/298) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 33% (43/88) | 6% (1/15) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 31% (41/133) | 6% (1/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 32% (7/22) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 34% (14/41) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (44/35) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (44/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (92/8) | 6% (16/1) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Aggarwal VS Manik H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Hontama Vs Parks Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Athens Open – Athens – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Vandewinkel Vs Falkowska Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Enka Open – Istanbul – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Knutson Vs Tararudee Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Enka Open – Istanbul – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Vandewinkel Vs Falkowska Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Enka Open – Istanbul – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Borges Vs Dimitrov Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Nordea Open – Bastad – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Hontama Vs Parks Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Athens Open – Athens – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Vandewinkel Vs Falkowska Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Enka Open – Istanbul – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Knutson Vs Tararudee Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Enka Open – Istanbul – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Vandewinkel Vs Falkowska Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Enka Open – Istanbul – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Borges Vs Dimitrov Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Nordea Open – Bastad – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
