Nathaniel Lammons vs Tal Goldengoren H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Lammons VS Goldengoren Head to Head: 1 - 0
The H2H record between Nathaniel Lammons and Tal Goldengoren stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 27-09-2016 in the First Round at the Israel F14, Lammons got the win with 7-5 7-5. Lammons stands at no. 595 in the rankings, whilst Goldengoren is no. Ret..
Ranking
595 ( 10-06-26)
Best Rank
591 ( 14-01-19)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
596 ( 20-04-15)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Lammons VS Goldengoren H2H Matches played
|
|
Israel F14 | ||||||||
|
27 Sep 2016 R1 |
Nathaniel Lammons
Player
Tal Goldengoren
55%
(
41 of
75)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
10
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
7
5
7
5
|
|||||||
Lammons VS Goldengoren Head to head matches stats
| stats | Nathaniel Lammons | Tal Goldengoren |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 14 | 10 |
| Total Aces | 10 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 3 | 6 |
| Average Match Time | 1:52:0 | 1:52:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (41/75) | 56% (40/71) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 71% (29/41) | 55% (22/40) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (17/34) | 55% (17/31) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 83% (5/6) | 38% (3/8) |
| Return Pts Won % | 45% (32/71) | 39% (29/75) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Nathaniel Lammons past matches
|
|
Chisinau Challenger | ||||||||
|
25 May 2026 QF |
7
6
6
4
|
L
|
Stefan Latinovic
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
H2H | |||||
|
24 May 2026 Q1 |
6
3
3
6
7
5
|
W
|
Nathaniel Lammons
Player
Adrian Boitan
52%
(
46 of
88)
1st Serve %
55%
(
64 of
116)
8
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
12
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
60%
(
25 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
27 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
47 of
116)
108
Total Points Won
96
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Guangzhou Challenger | ||||||||
|
08 Sep 2025 Q1 |
5
7
7
5
1
2
|
L
|
Tomohiro Masabayashi
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
7
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
35 of
45)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
19 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
79
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Charlottesville Challenger | ||||||||
|
31 Oct 2021 Q1 |
6
0
6
2
|
L
|
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Mouilleron-Le-Captif Challenger | ||||||||
|
03 Oct 2021 Q1 |
6
4
4
6
7
6
|
L
|
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
62%
(
58 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
18
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
52 of
61)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
31%
(
29 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
97)
97
Total Points Won
94
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Tal Goldengoren past matches
|
|
Israel F13 (Ashkelon) | ||||||||
|
10 Oct 2018 R2 |
6
3
6
3
|
L
|
Igor Smilansky
Player
Tal Goldengoren
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
71%
(
40 of
56)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
H2H | |||||
|
09 Oct 2018 R1 |
6
7
6
3
6
4
|
W
|
Tal Goldengoren
Player
Lior Goldenberg
72%
(
85 of
118)
1st Serve %
50%
(
57 of
113)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
11
54%
(
46 of
85)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
16 of
56)
67%
(
12 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
51%
(
60 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
65 of
113)
123
Total Points Won
108
|
H2H | |||||
|
08 Oct 2018 QF |
6
4
6
2
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
07 Oct 2018 Q2 |
7
6
6
3
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
06 Oct 2018 Q1 |
7
5
6
1
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
view more
Lammons VS Goldengoren matches vs all opponents
| stats | Nathaniel Lammons | Tal Goldengoren |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 60% (50/33) | 48% (87/95) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 61% (119/76) | 48% (198/213) |
| Games Won/Lost | 55% (987/805) | 50% (1847/1865) |
| Hard W/L | 60% (50/33) | 48% (87/95) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.27 | 0.03 |
| Total Aces | 235 | 48 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 | 0.11 |
| Total Double Faults | 124 | 198 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 889.46 | 1219.9 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (1677/2818) | 65% (2876/4401) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 71% (1194/1677) | 60% (1735/2876) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (574/1141) | 48% (730/1525) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 42% (93/223) | 43% (206/475) |
| Return Points Won % | 36% (1006/2810) | 42% (1740/4130) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 42% (5/7) | 33% (1/2) |
| Futures W/L | 63% (45/26) | 48% (86/93) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (50/82) | 48% (86/179) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 52% (13/25) | 69% (20/29) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 39% (11/28) | 50% (24/48) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (53/44) | 84% (86/72) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (53/9) | 16% (86/14) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (30/7) | 16% (96/15) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Lammons VS Goldengoren H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Prozorova Vs Kraus Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Ilkley Open – Ilkley – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Siegemund Vs Anisimova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA The HSBC Championships – London – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Bartunkova Vs Vandewinkel Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Struff Vs Bublik Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Boss Open – Stuttgart – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Jong Vs Milic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Cattolica Challenger – 9th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Prozorova Vs Kraus Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Ilkley Open – Ilkley – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Siegemund Vs Anisimova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA The HSBC Championships – London – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Bartunkova Vs Vandewinkel Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Struff Vs Bublik Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Boss Open – Stuttgart – 10th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Jong Vs Milic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Cattolica Challenger – 9th June 2026 (Day 2)