Mitchell Krueger vs Samuel Groth H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Krueger VS Groth Head to Head: 1 - 1
The H2H record between Mitchell Krueger and Samuel Groth stands at 1 - 1. In their last encounter on 25-09-2017 in the First Round at the Tiburon Challenger, Groth got the win with 6-4 7-5. Krueger stands at no. 349 in the rankings, whilst Groth is no. Ret..
Mitchell Krueger
Ranking
349 ( 17-06-26)
Best Rank
135 ( 18-07-22)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
Samuel Groth
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
53 ( 10-08-15)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
1
Total
1
1
Hard
1
0
Clay
0
0
Indoor
0
0
Grass
0
32 (12-01-1994)
Age
38 (19-10-1987)
188
Height
193
82
Weight
100
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Two-Handed
Backhand
One-Handed
Craig Kardon
Coach
Billy Heiser
2012
Turned Pro
2006
52% (459-422)
Career Total W/L
57% (387-296)
53% (281-249)
Career Hard W/L
53% (199-177)
55% (128-103)
Career Clay W/L
53% (44-39)
36% (10-18)
Career Grass W/L
69% (85-38)
43% (40-52)
Career Indoor W/L
58% (59-42)
$1,082,108
Career Prize Money
$650,305
32% (7-15)
YTD Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
Krueger VS Groth H2H Matches played
|
Tiburon Challenger | ||||||||
|
25 Sep 2017 R1 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Samuel Groth
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
0
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6
4
7
5
|
|||||||
|
|
Seoul Challenger | ||||||||
|
10 May 2016 R1 |
Samuel Groth
Player
Mitchell Krueger
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
12
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
0
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
31%
(
25 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
82
Total Points Won
66
|
4
6
6
3
6
2
|
|||||||
Krueger VS Groth Head to head matches stats
| stats | Mitchell Krueger | Samuel Groth |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
| Games Won | 24 | 25 |
| Total Aces | 3 | 20 |
| Total Double Faults | 1 | 12 |
| Average Match Time | 1:31:36 | 1:31:36 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (92/139) | 58% (82/141) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 67% (62/92) | 78% (64/82) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (24/47) | 44% (26/59) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 40% (6/15) | 50% (6/12) |
| Return Pts Won % | 36% (51/141) | 38% (53/139) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
Mitchell Krueger past matches
Before:
|
|
Tyler Challenger | ||||||||
|
03 Jun 2026 R1 |
6
4
6
4
|
L
|
Henry Searle
Player
Mitchell Krueger
54%
(
34 of
63)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
55
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Little Rock Challenger | ||||||||
|
26 May 2026 R1 |
6
2
6
3
|
L
|
Jay Dylan Hara Friend
Player
Mitchell Krueger
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
68%
(
48 of
71)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
H2H | |||||
|
Cervia Challenger | ||||||||
|
18 May 2026 R1 |
3
6
6
4
7
6
|
L
|
Manas Manoj Dhamne
Player
Mitchell Krueger
64%
(
68 of
106)
1st Serve %
70%
(
81 of
115)
11
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
54 of
81)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
40 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
44 of
115)
110
Total Points Won
111
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Oeiras 4 Challenger | ||||||||
|
11 May 2026 QF |
6
4
2
6
6
3
|
L
|
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Mitchell Krueger
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
67%
(
53 of
79)
11
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
38 of
53)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
24 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
27 of
79)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
H2H | |||||
|
10 May 2026 Q1 |
6
2
4
6
6
4
|
W
|
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Viktor Durasovic
69%
(
54 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
6
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
24 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Samuel Groth past matches
Before:
|
|
Australian Open - Melbourne | ||||||||
|
10 Jan 2018 Q1 |
6
4
3
6
7
6
|
L
|
Taylor Fritz
Player
Samuel Groth
59%
(
63 of
107)
1st Serve %
53%
(
55 of
103)
9
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
7
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
38 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
36 of
103)
105
Total Points Won
105
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Brisbane International - Brisbane | ||||||||
|
30 Dec 2017 Q1 |
6
4
7
6
|
L
|
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Samuel Groth
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
10
Aces
21
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
39 of
47)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
14 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
22 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Las Vegas Challenger | ||||||||
|
19 Oct 2017 R2 |
2
1
|
L
|
Jan Choinski
Player
Samuel Groth
67%
(
4 of
6)
1st Serve %
57%
(
8 of
14)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
50%
(
1 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
11
Total Points Won
9
|
H2H | |||||
|
17 Oct 2017 R1 |
6
3
6
4
|
W
|
Samuel Groth
Player
Mikael Torpegaard
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
14
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
18 of
23)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
13 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
47
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Fairfield Challenger | ||||||||
|
10 Oct 2017 R1 |
6
4
3
6
7
5
|
L
|
Noah Rubin
Player
Samuel Groth
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
103)
9
Aces
21
2
Double Faults
12
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
45 of
57)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
19 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
34 of
103)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Krueger VS Groth matches vs all opponents
| stats | Mitchell Krueger | Samuel Groth |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 53% (281/249) | 53% (199/177) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 53% (664/592) | 52% (471/437) |
| Games Won/Lost | 51% (6173/5916) | 51% (4747/4531) |
| Hard W/L | 53% (281/249) | 53% (199/177) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.34 | 0.6 |
| Total Aces | 2022 | 2717 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 | 0.21 |
| Total Double Faults | 1091 | 959 |
| Average Match Time | 1:27:5 | 1st Match |
| Average Opponent Rank | 638.04 | 931.97 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (19980/32211) | 59% (8692/14690) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 70% (13899/19980) | 79% (6841/8692) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (6252/12231) | 50% (3000/5996) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 40% (1181/2944) | 33% (309/933) |
| Return Points Won % | 38% (12277/32280) | 32% (4579/14327) |
| Slam W/L | 56% (28/22) | 29% (7/17) |
| Masters W/L | 38% (12/20) | 36% (5/9) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (20/20) | 39% (24/37) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 51% (154/149) | 52% (92/84) |
| Futures W/L | 64% (67/38) | 72% (71/27) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (276/520) | 54% (192/355) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 44% (4/9) | 38% (5/13) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 45% (83/183) | 50% (112/225) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 47% (86/184) | 53% (79/149) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (287/234) | 80% (191/152) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (287/53) | 20% (191/38) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (243/46) | 25% (183/45) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Krueger VS Groth H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Bertola Vs Wu Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Nottingham 2 Challenger – 16th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Bertola Vs Wu Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Nottingham 2 Challenger – 16th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Sonmez Vs Fernandez Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Nottingham Open – Nottingham – 16th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Korneeva Vs Tian Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Ladies Open – Figueira da Foz – 16th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Zhang Vs Muchova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Berlin Tennis Open – Berlin – 16th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Bertola Vs Wu Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Nottingham 2 Challenger – 16th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Bertola Vs Wu Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Nottingham 2 Challenger – 16th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Sonmez Vs Fernandez Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Nottingham Open – Nottingham – 16th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Korneeva Vs Tian Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Ladies Open – Figueira da Foz – 16th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Zhang Vs Muchova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Berlin Tennis Open – Berlin – 16th June 2026 (Day 2)
