Mitchell Krueger vs Jordan Cox H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com

By James Morris

Krueger VS Cox Head to Head: 1 - 0

The H2H record between Mitchell Krueger and Jordan Cox stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 21-07-2012 in the Q1 round Round at the Lexington Challenger, Krueger got the win with 6-1 6-3. Krueger stands at no. 334 in the rankings, whilst Cox is no. Ret..

Krueger vs Cox Prediction H2H
USA
Mitchell Krueger

Ranking

334 ( 26-05-26)

Best Rank

135 ( 18-07-22)

trophyatp Titles

0

trophyatp Titles

0

trophy Grand Slams

0

trophy Masters

0

trophy Main Tour

0

Recent Form

L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
Krueger vs Cox Prediction H2H
USA
Jordan Cox

Ranking

Ret.

Best Rank

449 ( 21-03-11)

trophyatp Titles

0

trophyatp Titles

0

trophy Grand Slams

0

trophy Masters

0

trophy Main Tour

0

Recent Form

L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L

1

Total

0

1

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

Krueger upcoming match (26-05-26)

Krueger VS Cox H2H Matches played

Hard Lexington Challenger

21 Jul

2012

Q1

cross
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Jordan Cox
52% ( 25 of 48)
1st Serve %
47% ( 21 of 45)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
64% ( 16 of 25)
1st Serve Won
43% ( 9 of 21)
61% ( 14 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
33% ( 8 of 24)
75% ( 6 of 8)
Break Points Won
67% ( 2 of 3)
38% ( 18 of 48)
Rtn Points Won
62% ( 28 of 45)
58
Total Points Won
35
6 1
6 3

Krueger VS Cox Head to head matches stats

stats Mitchell Krueger Jordan Cox
All Head to Head Matches 1 0
Sets Won 2 0
Games Won 12 4
Total Aces 0 1
Total Double Faults 3 0
Average Match Time 1:7:0 1:7:0
1st Serve % 52% (25/48) 47% (21/45)
1st Serve Win % 64% (16/25) 43% (9/21)
2nd Serve Win % 61% (14/23) 33% (8/24)
Total Break Points Won % 75% (6/8) 67% (2/3)
Return Pts Won % 62% (28/45) 38% (18/48)
Best of 3 Sets Win % 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Total Tiebreaks Win % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match 100% (1/1) 0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match 0% (1/0) 0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match 0% (0/0) 0% (1/0)

Mitchell Krueger past matches

Clay Cervia Challenger

18 May

2026

R1

3 6
6 4
7 6
L
cross
Manas Manoj Dhamne
Player
Mitchell Krueger
64% ( 68 of 106)
1st Serve %
70% ( 81 of 115)
11
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
72% ( 49 of 68)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 54 of 81)
45% ( 17 of 38)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 17 of 34)
33% ( 3 of 9)
Break Points Won
30% ( 3 of 10)
38% ( 40 of 106)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 44 of 115)
110
Total Points Won
111
H2H
Clay Oeiras 4 Challenger

11 May

2026

QF

6 4
2 6
6 3
L
cross
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Mitchell Krueger
60% ( 47 of 78)
1st Serve %
67% ( 53 of 79)
11
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
74% ( 35 of 47)
1st Serve Won
72% ( 38 of 53)
61% ( 19 of 31)
2nd Serve Won
54% ( 14 of 26)
50% ( 2 of 4)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
31% ( 24 of 78)
Rtn Points Won
34% ( 27 of 79)
81
Total Points Won
76
H2H

10 May

2026

Q1

6 2
4 6
6 4
W
cross
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Viktor Durasovic
69% ( 54 of 78)
1st Serve %
64% ( 54 of 85)
6
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
2
72% ( 39 of 54)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 36 of 54)
63% ( 15 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 15 of 31)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
29% ( 2 of 7)
31% ( 24 of 78)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 34 of 85)
88
Total Points Won
75
H2H
Clay Savannah Challenger

24 Apr

2026

QF

7 6
7 6
L
cross
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Mitchell Krueger
62% ( 45 of 73)
1st Serve %
64% ( 57 of 89)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
64% ( 29 of 45)
1st Serve Won
56% ( 32 of 57)
61% ( 17 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 14 of 32)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
67% ( 4 of 6)
37% ( 27 of 73)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 43 of 89)
89
Total Points Won
73
H2H

23 Apr

2026

R2

6 2
6 7
6 2
W
cross
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Braden Shick
64% ( 59 of 92)
1st Serve %
46% ( 45 of 97)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
71% ( 42 of 59)
1st Serve Won
62% ( 28 of 45)
45% ( 15 of 33)
2nd Serve Won
46% ( 24 of 52)
70% ( 7 of 10)
Break Points Won
50% ( 3 of 6)
38% ( 35 of 92)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 45 of 97)
102
Total Points Won
87
H2H

Jordan Cox past matches

Hard Lexington Challenger

21 Jul

2012

Q1

6 1
6 3
L
cross
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Jordan Cox
52% ( 25 of 48)
1st Serve %
47% ( 21 of 45)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
64% ( 16 of 25)
1st Serve Won
43% ( 9 of 21)
61% ( 14 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
33% ( 8 of 24)
75% ( 6 of 8)
Break Points Won
67% ( 2 of 3)
38% ( 18 of 48)
Rtn Points Won
62% ( 28 of 45)
58
Total Points Won
35
H2H
Clay USA F18

02 Jul

2012

R1

6 3
6 1
W
H2H

02 Jul

2012

R2

6 3
6 3
L
H2H
Clay USA F17

25 Jun

2012

R2

6 7
7 6
6 1
W
H2H

25 Jun

2012

R1

3 6
6 1
6 2
W
H2H

Krueger VS Cox matches vs all opponents

stats Mitchell Krueger Jordan Cox
YTD Win/Loss 53% (281/247) 45% (35/43)
Sets Won/Lost 53% (664/588) 45% (77/95)
Games Won/Lost 51% (6160/5892) 48% (761/838)
Hard W/L 53% (281/247) 45% (35/43)
Clay W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Indoor Hard W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Grass W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces Per Game 0.34 0.03
Total Aces 2016 23
Double Faults Per Game 0.18 0.02
Total Double Faults 1088 19
Average Match Time 1:27:4 1st Match
Average Opponent Rank 635.95 1151.17
1st Serve % 62% (19894/32085) 59% (292/496)
1st Serve Win % 70% (13843/19894) 60% (176/292)
2nd Serve Win % 51% (6234/12191) 45% (92/204)
Total Break Points Won % 40% (1181/2939) 46% (16/35)
Return Points Won % 38% (12236/32156) 36% (180/497)
Slam W/L 56% (28/22) 0% (0/2)
Masters W/L 38% (12/20) 0% (0/1)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 50% (20/20) 33% (1/2)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 51% (154/147) 27% (3/8)
Futures W/L 64% (67/38) 51% (31/30)
Best of 3 Sets Win % 53% (276/518) 45% (35/77)
Best of 5 Sets Win % 44% (4/9) 0% (0/0)
Total Tiebreaks Win % 45% (83/183) 61% (14/23)
Deciding Set Win % 47% (86/184) 59% (10/17)
1st Set Won, Won Match 82% (287/234) 97% (30/29)
1st Set Won, Lost Match 18% (287/53) 3% (30/1)
1st Set Lost, Won Match 19% (241/46) 13% (48/6)
banner

Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.

Krueger & Cox Last Match Highlights

YouTube video

SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Krueger VS Cox H2H

UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS

You Might Also Like