Mitchell Harper vs Kyle Overmyer H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Harper VS Overmyer Head to Head: 1 - 0
The H2H record between Mitchell Harper and Kyle Overmyer stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 17-06-2024 in the Q1 round Round at the M15 Rancho Santa Fe 1, Harper got the win with 6-2 6-3. Harper stands at no. 893 in the rankings, whilst Overmyer is no. -.
Ranking
893 ( 07-07-26)
Best Rank
791 ( 19-06-23)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
Ranking
- ( 07-07-26)
Best Rank
( 01-01-70)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Harper VS Overmyer H2H Matches played
|
M15 Rancho Santa Fe 1 | ||||||||
|
17 Jun 2024 Q1 |
6
2
6
3
|
||||||||
Harper VS Overmyer Head to head matches stats
| stats | Mitchell Harper | Kyle Overmyer |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Total Aces | 0 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 0 |
| Average Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Mitchell Harper past matches
|
|
M15 Rancho Santa Fe 1 | ||||||||
|
18 Jun 2024 QF |
7
6
6
3
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
17 Jun 2024 Q1 |
6
2
6
3
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M15 San Diego 3 | ||||||||
|
11 Jun 2024 QF |
6
2
6
2
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
10 Jun 2024 Q1 |
6
2
6
0
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M15 Monastir 20 | ||||||||
|
14 May 2024 R1 |
6
3
6
4
|
L
|
Enzo Wallart
Player
Mitchell Harper
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
9
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Kyle Overmyer past matches
|
|
M15 Rancho Santa Fe | ||||||||
|
07 Jul 2026 QF |
6
4
3
0
|
L
|
Hugo Hashimoto
Player
Kyle Overmyer
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
55%
(
21 of
38)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
13 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
47
Total Points Won
30
|
H2H | |||||
|
06 Jul 2026 Q1 |
7
6
6
0
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M15 San Diego | ||||||||
|
29 Jun 2026 Q1 |
6
0
6
1
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M15 Irvine | ||||||||
|
15 Jun 2026 Q1 |
7
5
6
4
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M15 Los Angeles | ||||||||
|
10 Jun 2026 R1 |
4
6
6
4
6
2
|
L
|
Marcel Latak
Player
Kyle Overmyer
62%
(
59 of
95)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
83)
4
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
4
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
43 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
91
Total Points Won
87
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Harper VS Overmyer matches vs all opponents
| stats | Mitchell Harper | Kyle Overmyer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 53% (51/45) | 34% (21/40) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 54% (115/98) | 38% (54/87) |
| Games Won/Lost | 53% (1040/938) | 45% (630/761) |
| Hard W/L | 53% (51/45) | 34% (21/40) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.22 | 0.02 |
| Total Aces | 211 | 13 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 | 0.06 |
| Total Double Faults | 144 | 39 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 699.05 | 320.64 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (2479/4019) | 63% (706/1116) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 68% (1689/2479) | 59% (419/706) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (763/1540) | 47% (192/410) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 46% (177/385) | 56% (47/84) |
| Return Points Won % | 40% (1618/4043) | 40% (424/1051) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 23% (3/10) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 58% (48/35) | 35% (21/39) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (50/94) | 34% (21/61) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 48% (12/25) | 58% (7/12) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 39% (9/23) | 37% (7/19) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (53/46) | 67% (24/16) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (53/7) | 33% (24/8) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (43/5) | 14% (37/5) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Harper VS Overmyer H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Royer Vs Neuchrist Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Iasi Challenger – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Marcinko Vs Burel Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Grand Est Open 88 – Contrexeville – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Aliassime Vs Djokovic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 7th July 2026 (Day 9)
-
Kotliar Vs Selekhmeteva Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Grand Est Open 88 – Contrexeville – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Seidel Vs Kulikova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA W50 Corroios-Seixal – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Royer Vs Neuchrist Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Iasi Challenger – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Marcinko Vs Burel Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Grand Est Open 88 – Contrexeville – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Aliassime Vs Djokovic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 7th July 2026 (Day 9)
-
Kotliar Vs Selekhmeteva Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Grand Est Open 88 – Contrexeville – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Seidel Vs Kulikova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA W50 Corroios-Seixal – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
