Mirza Basic vs Matteo Viola H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com

By James Morris

Basic VS Viola Head to Head: 1 - 3

The H2H record between Mirza Basic and Matteo Viola stands at 1 - 3. In their last encounter on 27-07-2021 in the First Round at the Segovia Challenger, Viola got the win with 6-4 6-1. Basic stands at no. 542 in the rankings, whilst Viola is no. Ret..

Basic vs Viola Prediction H2H
BIH
Mirza Basic

Ranking

542 ( 16-06-26)

Best Rank

74 ( 19-02-18)

trophyatp Titles

1

trophyatp Titles

1

trophy Grand Slams

0

trophy Masters

0

trophy Main Tour

1

Recent Form

W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
Basic vs Viola Prediction H2H
ITA
Matteo Viola

Ranking

Ret.

Best Rank

118 ( 18-03-13)

trophyatp Titles

0

trophyatp Titles

0

trophy Grand Slams

0

trophy Masters

0

trophy Main Tour

0

Recent Form

L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L

1

Total

3

1

Hard

2

0

Clay

1

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

Basic VS Viola H2H Matches played

Hard Segovia Challenger

27 Jul

2021

R1

cross
Matteo Viola
Player
Mirza Basic
63% ( 40 of 63)
1st Serve %
59% ( 32 of 54)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
65% ( 26 of 40)
1st Serve Won
53% ( 17 of 32)
52% ( 12 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
32% ( 7 of 22)
50% ( 5 of 10)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
40% ( 25 of 63)
Rtn Points Won
56% ( 30 of 54)
68
Total Points Won
49
6 4
6 1
Hard Portoroz Challenger

11 Aug

2015

R1

cross
Mirza Basic
Player
Matteo Viola
57% ( 51 of 89)
1st Serve %
70% ( 61 of 87)
6
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
65% ( 33 of 51)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 39 of 61)
55% ( 21 of 38)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 13 of 26)
36% ( 4 of 11)
Break Points Won
38% ( 3 of 8)
39% ( 35 of 89)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 35 of 87)
89
Total Points Won
87
6 2
2 6
6 4
Clay French Open - Paris

19 May

2015

Q1

cross
Matteo Viola
Player
Mirza Basic
68% ( 43 of 63)
1st Serve %
58% ( 42 of 72)
6
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
77% ( 33 of 43)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 25 of 42)
50% ( 10 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 13 of 30)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
32% ( 20 of 63)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 34 of 72)
77
Total Points Won
58
6 2
7 5
Hard Yokohama Challenger

17 Nov

2012

F

cross
Matteo Viola
Player
Mirza Basic
61% ( 51 of 83)
1st Serve %
70% ( 51 of 73)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
75% ( 38 of 51)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 32 of 51)
56% ( 18 of 32)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 11 of 22)
29% ( 2 of 7)
Break Points Won
14% ( 1 of 7)
33% ( 27 of 83)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 30 of 73)
86
Total Points Won
70
7 6
6 3

Basic VS Viola Head to head matches stats

stats Mirza Basic Matteo Viola
All Head to Head Matches 1 3
Sets Won 2 7
Games Won 35 50
Total Aces 14 15
Total Double Faults 9 13
Average Match Time 1:11:35 1:11:35
1st Serve % 61% (176/288) 66% (195/296)
1st Serve Win % 61% (107/176) 70% (136/195)
2nd Serve Win % 46% (52/112) 52% (53/101)
Total Break Points Won % 31% (8/26) 44% (14/32)
Return Pts Won % 36% (107/296) 45% (129/288)
Best of 3 Sets Win % 25% (1/4) 75% (3/4)
Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Total Tiebreaks Win % 0% (0/1) 100% (1/1)
Deciding Set Win % 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match 100% (1/1) 100% (3/3)
1st Set Won, Lost Match 0% (1/0) 0% (3/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match 0% (3/0) 0% (1/0)

Mirza Basic past matches

Clay M25 Kiseljak

10 Jun

2026

R1

6 2
7 6
L
cross
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
Player
Mirza Basic
62% ( 41 of 66)
1st Serve %
63% ( 55 of 88)
14
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
80% ( 33 of 41)
1st Serve Won
71% ( 39 of 55)
60% ( 15 of 25)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 13 of 33)
25% ( 2 of 8)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 3)
27% ( 18 of 66)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 36 of 88)
84
Total Points Won
70
H2H
Clay Zagreb Challenger

10 May

2026

Q1

7 5
6 4
L
cross
Andrej Nedic
Player
Mirza Basic
69% ( 42 of 61)
1st Serve %
57% ( 35 of 61)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
76% ( 32 of 42)
1st Serve Won
69% ( 24 of 35)
42% ( 8 of 19)
2nd Serve Won
46% ( 12 of 26)
100% ( 4 of 4)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
34% ( 21 of 61)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 25 of 61)
65
Total Points Won
57
H2H
Clay Ostrava Challenger

27 Apr

2026

QF

6 4
6 4
L
cross
Carlos Sanchez Jover
Player
Mirza Basic
66% ( 41 of 62)
1st Serve %
62% ( 43 of 69)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
71% ( 29 of 41)
1st Serve Won
53% ( 23 of 43)
57% ( 12 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 13 of 26)
80% ( 4 of 5)
Break Points Won
29% ( 2 of 7)
34% ( 21 of 62)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 33 of 69)
74
Total Points Won
57
H2H

26 Apr

2026

Q1

6 7
6 4
7 5
W
cross
Mirza Basic
Player
Jan Klimas
66% ( 82 of 125)
1st Serve %
53% ( 62 of 117)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
12
57% ( 47 of 82)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 37 of 62)
47% ( 20 of 43)
2nd Serve Won
40% ( 22 of 55)
36% ( 8 of 22)
Break Points Won
50% ( 6 of 12)
46% ( 58 of 125)
Rtn Points Won
50% ( 58 of 117)
125
Total Points Won
117
H2H
Clay Split Challenger

23 Mar

2026

QF

4 6
6 1
6 0
L
cross
Juan Cruz Martin Manzano
Player
Mirza Basic
68% ( 46 of 68)
1st Serve %
55% ( 36 of 65)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
74% ( 34 of 46)
1st Serve Won
56% ( 20 of 36)
64% ( 14 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
52% ( 15 of 29)
83% ( 5 of 6)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
29% ( 20 of 68)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 30 of 65)
78
Total Points Won
55
H2H

Matteo Viola past matches

Clay Forli 6 Challenger

29 May

2022

Q1

7 5
6 1
L
cross
Matteo Martineau
Player
Matteo Viola
67% ( 44 of 66)
1st Serve %
55% ( 33 of 60)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
66% ( 29 of 44)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 20 of 33)
45% ( 10 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
30% ( 8 of 27)
100% ( 6 of 6)
Break Points Won
20% ( 2 of 10)
41% ( 27 of 66)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 32 of 60)
71
Total Points Won
55
H2H
Clay Vicenza Challenger

22 May

2022

Q1

L
H2H
Clay Francavilla Challenger

18 May

2022

R2

6 3
2 6
6 3
L
cross
Mate Valkusz
Player
Matteo Viola
59% ( 47 of 80)
1st Serve %
73% ( 58 of 80)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
74% ( 35 of 47)
1st Serve Won
66% ( 38 of 58)
39% ( 13 of 33)
2nd Serve Won
32% ( 7 of 22)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
50% ( 3 of 6)
40% ( 32 of 80)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 35 of 80)
83
Total Points Won
77
H2H

17 May

2022

R1

6 2
7 6
W
cross
Matteo Viola
Player
Omar Giacalone
60% ( 42 of 70)
1st Serve %
50% ( 32 of 64)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
57% ( 24 of 42)
1st Serve Won
53% ( 17 of 32)
50% ( 14 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 12 of 32)
75% ( 6 of 8)
Break Points Won
33% ( 4 of 12)
46% ( 32 of 70)
Rtn Points Won
55% ( 35 of 64)
73
Total Points Won
61
H2H
Clay Mauthausen Challenger

02 May

2022

QF

6 3
6 0
L
cross
Alexander Shevchenko
Player
Matteo Viola
55% ( 24 of 44)
1st Serve %
59% ( 29 of 49)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
71% ( 17 of 24)
1st Serve Won
45% ( 13 of 29)
50% ( 10 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
30% ( 6 of 20)
60% ( 6 of 10)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
39% ( 17 of 44)
Rtn Points Won
61% ( 30 of 49)
57
Total Points Won
36
H2H

Basic VS Viola matches vs all opponents

stats Mirza Basic Matteo Viola
YTD Win/Loss 57% (135/102) 59% (119/82)
Sets Won/Lost 55% (299/244) 56% (263/205)
Games Won/Lost 51% (2723/2589) 53% (2299/2064)
Hard W/L 57% (135/102) 59% (119/82)
Clay W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Indoor Hard W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Grass W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces Per Game 0.38 0.13
Total Aces 978 279
Double Faults Per Game 0.17 0.32
Total Double Faults 443 679
Average Match Time 1:14:47 1:25:56
Average Opponent Rank 784.24 852.96
1st Serve % 60% (8436/13944) 65% (8644/13234)
1st Serve Win % 71% (5988/8436) 64% (5532/8644)
2nd Serve Win % 52% (2836/5506) 48% (2215/4590)
Total Break Points Won % 41% (502/1216) 45% (667/1483)
Return Points Won % 37% (5010/13538) 44% (5556/12765)
Slam W/L 43% (10/13) 39% (9/14)
Masters W/L 22% (2/7) 40% (4/6)
Cups W/L 40% (2/3) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 47% (8/9) 50% (6/6)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 61% (84/53) 59% (59/41)
Futures W/L 64% (29/16) 73% (41/15)
Best of 3 Sets Win % 57% (131/228) 59% (116/197)
Best of 5 Sets Win % 33% (2/6) 50% (1/2)
Total Tiebreaks Win % 56% (44/79) 65% (35/54)
Deciding Set Win % 57% (37/65) 58% (39/67)
1st Set Won, Won Match 88% (134/118) 86% (111/95)
1st Set Won, Lost Match 12% (134/16) 14% (111/16)
1st Set Lost, Won Match 17% (103/17) 26% (90/23)
banner

Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.

Basic & Viola Last Match Highlights

YouTube video

SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Basic VS Viola H2H

UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS

You Might Also Like