Mirza Basic vs Jurgen Zopp H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Basic VS Zopp Head to Head: 1 - 0
The H2H record between Mirza Basic and Jurgen Zopp stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 16-11-2017 in the Second Round at the Brescia Challenger, Basic got the win with 3-6 6-3 6-4. Basic stands at no. 539 in the rankings, whilst Zopp is no. Ret..
Ranking
539 ( 05-06-26)
Best Rank
74 ( 19-02-18)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
1
Recent Form
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
71 ( 10-09-12)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
Basic VS Zopp H2H Matches played
|
|
Brescia Challenger | ||||||||
|
16 Nov 2017 R2 |
Mirza Basic
Player
Jurgen Zopp
59%
(
51 of
86)
1st Serve %
73%
(
53 of
73)
8
Aces
20
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
40 of
53)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
27 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
20 of
73)
79
Total Points Won
80
|
3
6
6
3
6
4
|
|||||||
Basic VS Zopp Head to head matches stats
| stats | Mirza Basic | Jurgen Zopp |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 13 |
| Total Aces | 8 | 20 |
| Total Double Faults | 2 | 1 |
| Average Match Time | 1:28:33 | 1:28:33 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (51/86) | 73% (53/73) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 78% (40/51) | 75% (40/53) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (19/35) | 65% (13/20) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 67% (2/3) | 25% (1/4) |
| Return Pts Won % | 27% (20/73) | 31% (27/86) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Mirza Basic past matches
|
|
Zagreb Challenger | ||||||||
|
10 May 2026 Q1 |
7
5
6
4
|
L
|
Andrej Nedic
Player
Mirza Basic
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
57
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Ostrava Challenger | ||||||||
|
27 Apr 2026 QF |
6
4
6
4
|
L
|
Carlos Sanchez Jover
Player
Mirza Basic
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
H2H | |||||
|
26 Apr 2026 Q1 |
6
7
6
4
7
5
|
W
|
Mirza Basic
Player
Jan Klimas
66%
(
82 of
125)
1st Serve %
53%
(
62 of
117)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
12
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
36%
(
8 of
22)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
46%
(
58 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
58 of
117)
125
Total Points Won
117
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Split Challenger | ||||||||
|
23 Mar 2026 QF |
4
6
6
1
6
0
|
L
|
Juan Cruz Martin Manzano
Player
Mirza Basic
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
20 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
78
Total Points Won
55
|
H2H | |||||
|
22 Mar 2026 Q1 |
6
2
6
4
|
W
|
Mirza Basic
Player
Dinko Dinev
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
74%
(
43 of
58)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Jurgen Zopp past matches
|
|
Davis Cup, Group II, PO, EST-POC 4-0 | ||||||||
|
04 Mar 2022 Rubber 1 |
6
2
6
4
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M15 Parnu 1 | ||||||||
|
04 Nov 2020 R1 |
3
6
6
3
6
4
|
L
|
Karlis Ozolins
Player
Jurgen Zopp
63%
(
58 of
92)
1st Serve %
59%
(
57 of
96)
5
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
32 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M25 Hamburg 1 | ||||||||
|
19 Oct 2020 QF |
6
7
6
4
10
3
|
L
|
Lewie Lane
Player
Jurgen Zopp
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
24 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M25 Prague 1 | ||||||||
|
13 Sep 2020 Q1 |
7
6
6
1
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M15 Caslano 1 | ||||||||
|
31 Aug 2020 Q1 |
6
7
7
5
10
6
|
L
|
Thiago Agustin Tirante
Player
Jurgen Zopp
74%
(
55 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
2
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
28%
(
21 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Basic VS Zopp matches vs all opponents
| stats | Mirza Basic | Jurgen Zopp |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 57% (135/102) | 49% (62/65) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 55% (299/244) | 49% (147/153) |
| Games Won/Lost | 51% (2723/2589) | 50% (1411/1435) |
| Hard W/L | 57% (135/102) | 49% (62/65) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.38 | 0.29 |
| Total Aces | 978 | 404 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 | 0.17 |
| Total Double Faults | 443 | 243 |
| Average Match Time | 1:14:47 | 1:8:40 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 784.61 | 896.21 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (8436/13944) | 60% (3982/6602) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 71% (5988/8436) | 70% (2768/3982) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (2836/5506) | 52% (1354/2620) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 41% (502/1216) | 38% (232/615) |
| Return Points Won % | 37% (5010/13538) | 37% (2416/6460) |
| Slam W/L | 43% (10/13) | 35% (6/11) |
| Masters W/L | 22% (2/7) | 43% (3/4) |
| Cups W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 47% (8/9) | 45% (5/6) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 61% (84/53) | 58% (37/27) |
| Futures W/L | 64% (29/16) | 41% (11/16) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (131/228) | 50% (59/119) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (2/6) | 33% (2/6) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 56% (44/79) | 54% (19/35) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 57% (37/65) | 48% (19/40) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (134/118) | 86% (57/49) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (134/16) | 12% (57/7) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (103/17) | 17% (70/12) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Basic VS Zopp H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Kabbaj Vs Joint Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Makarska Open – Makarska – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Marcinko Vs Palicova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Makarska Open – Makarska – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Waltert Vs Garcia Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Makarska Open – Makarska – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Trungelliti Vs Hsu Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bad Rappenau Challenger – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Bartunkova Vs Knutson Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Birmingham Open – Birmingham – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Kabbaj Vs Joint Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Makarska Open – Makarska – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Marcinko Vs Palicova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Makarska Open – Makarska – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Waltert Vs Garcia Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Makarska Open – Makarska – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Trungelliti Vs Hsu Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bad Rappenau Challenger – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Bartunkova Vs Knutson Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Birmingham Open – Birmingham – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
