Mirza Basic vs Cem Ilkel H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Basic VS Ilkel Head to Head: 3 - 0
The H2H record between Mirza Basic and Cem Ilkel stands at 3 - 0. In their last encounter on 06-04-2021 in the First Round at the Split 1 Challenger, Basic got the win with 7-6(4) 6-3. Basic stands at no. 540 in the rankings, whilst Ilkel is no. 807.
Mirza Basic
Ranking
540 ( 08-07-26)
Best Rank
74 ( 19-02-18)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
1
Recent Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
Cem Ilkel
Ranking
807 ( 08-07-26)
Best Rank
144 ( 29-11-21)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
3
Total
0
1
Hard
0
1
Clay
0
1
Indoor
0
0
Grass
0
34 (12-07-1991)
Age
30 (21-08-1995)
188
Height
185
88
Weight
81
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Two-Handed
Backhand
Two-Handed
Damir Basic, Daniel Meyers
Coach
Gavin Hopper
2012
Turned Pro
2013
57% (535-404)
Career Total W/L
56% (438-338)
57% (135-102)
Career Hard W/L
61% (288-181)
57% (206-157)
Career Clay W/L
44% (57-72)
41% (14-20)
Career Grass W/L
10% (1-9)
59% (180-125)
Career Indoor W/L
55% (92-76)
$478,883
Career Prize Money
$225,530
50% (8-8)
YTD Win/Loss
0% (0-1)
Basic VS Ilkel H2H Matches played
|
Split 1 Challenger | ||||||||
|
06 Apr 2021 R1 |
Mirza Basic
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
57 of
80)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
30%
(
24 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
71)
82
Total Points Won
69
|
7
6
6
3
|
|||||||
|
Cherbourg Challenger | ||||||||
|
11 Feb 2020 R2 |
Mirza Basic
Player
Cem Ilkel
67%
(
56 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
7
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
36 of
48)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
29 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
25 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
78
|
3
6
6
2
6
3
|
|||||||
|
Portoroz Challenger | ||||||||
|
12 Aug 2015 R2 |
Mirza Basic
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6
2
6
2
|
|||||||
Basic VS Ilkel Head to head matches stats
| stats | Mirza Basic | Cem Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 3 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 6 | 1 |
| Games Won | 40 | 24 |
| Total Aces | 15 | 14 |
| Total Double Faults | 2 | 8 |
| Average Match Time | 1:27:6 | 1:27:6 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (139/206) | 62% (123/198) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 76% (105/139) | 72% (88/123) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 57% (38/67) | 44% (33/75) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 47% (8/17) | 7% (1/14) |
| Return Pts Won % | 39% (77/198) | 31% (63/206) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (2/0) |
Mirza Basic past matches
Before:
|
|
M25 Kiseljak | ||||||||
|
10 Jun 2026 R1 |
6
2
7
6
|
L
|
.jpg)
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
Player
Mirza Basic
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
14
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
18 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
84
Total Points Won
70
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Zagreb Challenger | ||||||||
|
10 May 2026 Q1 |
7
5
6
4
|
L
|
Andrej Nedic
Player
Mirza Basic
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
57
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Ostrava Challenger | ||||||||
|
27 Apr 2026 QF |
6
4
6
4
|
L
|
Carlos Sanchez Jover
Player
Mirza Basic
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
H2H | |||||
|
26 Apr 2026 Q1 |
6
7
6
4
7
5
|
W
|
Mirza Basic
Player
Jan Klimas
66%
(
82 of
125)
1st Serve %
53%
(
62 of
117)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
12
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
36%
(
8 of
22)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
46%
(
58 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
58 of
117)
125
Total Points Won
117
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Split Challenger | ||||||||
|
23 Mar 2026 QF |
4
6
6
1
6
0
|
L
|
Juan Cruz Martin Manzano
Player
Mirza Basic
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
20 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
78
Total Points Won
55
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Cem Ilkel past matches
Before:
|
|
Istanbul Challenger | ||||||||
|
17 May 2026 Q1 |
6
1
5
7
6
3
|
L
|
Vladyslav Orlov
Player
Cem Ilkel
54%
(
48 of
89)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Chisinau Challenger | ||||||||
|
29 May 2025 R2 |
6
4
6
7
7
6
|
L
|
Petr Bar Biryukov
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
68 of
107)
1st Serve %
78%
(
80 of
103)
22
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
1
85%
(
58 of
68)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
61 of
80)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
27 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
26 of
103)
106
Total Points Won
104
|
H2H | |||||
|
28 May 2025 R1 |
6
4
6
3
|
W
|
Cem Ilkel
Player
Mukund Sasikumar
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
74%
(
49 of
66)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Tbilisi Challenger | ||||||||
|
18 May 2025 Q1 |
7
6
6
3
|
L
|
Giles Hussey
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
61 of
95)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
65)
82
Total Points Won
78
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M25 Tbilisi 1 | ||||||||
|
13 May 2025 R1 |
6
2
6
4
|
L
|
Evgeny Karlovskiy
Player
Cem Ilkel
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Basic VS Ilkel matches vs all opponents
| stats | Mirza Basic | Cem Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 57% (135/102) | 61% (288/181) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 55% (299/244) | 59% (631/440) |
| Games Won/Lost | 51% (2723/2589) | 53% (5350/4741) |
| Hard W/L | 57% (135/102) | 61% (288/181) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.38 | 0.32 |
| Total Aces | 978 | 1593 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 | 0.16 |
| Total Double Faults | 443 | 771 |
| Average Match Time | 1:14:47 | 1:5:51 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 783 | 886.43 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (8436/13944) | 58% (12861/22032) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 71% (5988/8436) | 71% (9108/12861) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (2836/5506) | 51% (4705/9171) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 41% (502/1216) | 41% (929/2274) |
| Return Points Won % | 37% (5010/13538) | 40% (8844/22248) |
| Slam W/L | 43% (10/13) | 47% (7/8) |
| Masters W/L | 22% (2/7) | 67% (2/1) |
| Cups W/L | 40% (2/3) | 20% (1/4) |
| Main Tour W/L | 47% (8/9) | 14% (1/6) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 61% (84/53) | 52% (79/72) |
| Futures W/L | 64% (29/16) | 69% (198/90) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (131/228) | 61% (280/457) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (2/6) | 40% (2/5) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 56% (44/79) | 56% (87/156) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 57% (37/65) | 56% (74/132) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (134/118) | 87% (280/244) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (134/16) | 12% (280/34) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (103/17) | 22% (188/42) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Basic VS Ilkel H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Royer Vs Neuchrist Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Iasi Challenger – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Marcinko Vs Burel Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Grand Est Open 88 – Contrexeville – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Aliassime Vs Djokovic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 7th July 2026 (Day 9)
-
Kotliar Vs Selekhmeteva Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Grand Est Open 88 – Contrexeville – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Seidel Vs Kulikova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA W50 Corroios-Seixal – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Royer Vs Neuchrist Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Iasi Challenger – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Marcinko Vs Burel Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Grand Est Open 88 – Contrexeville – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Aliassime Vs Djokovic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 7th July 2026 (Day 9)
-
Kotliar Vs Selekhmeteva Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Grand Est Open 88 – Contrexeville – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Seidel Vs Kulikova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA W50 Corroios-Seixal – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
