Maxime Hamou vs Naoki Tajima H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Hamou VS Tajima Head to Head: 1 - 0
The H2H record between Maxime Hamou and Naoki Tajima stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 04-05-2019 in the Semifinals Round at the M15 Grasse 1, Hamou got the win with 6-3 6-3. Hamou stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Tajima is no. 881.
Maxime Hamou
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
211 ( 27-07-15)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
Naoki Tajima
Ranking
881 ( 05-06-26)
Best Rank
604 ( 20-01-20)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
1
Total
0
0
Hard
0
1
Clay
0
0
Indoor
0
0
Grass
0
30 (08-06-1995)
Age
25 (21-09-2000)
185
Height
173
75
Weight
73
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Two-Handed
Backhand
Two-Handed
Alois Beust
Coach
Turned Pro
61% (314-201)
Career Total W/L
50% (169-169)
52% (23-21)
Career Hard W/L
52% (128-120)
64% (282-162)
Career Clay W/L
48% (33-36)
0% (0-1)
Career Grass W/L
20% (1-4)
35% (9-17)
Career Indoor W/L
44% (7-9)
$35,000
Career Prize Money
$0
0% (0-0)
YTD Win/Loss
60% (3-2)
Hamou VS Tajima H2H Matches played
|
M15 Grasse 1 | ||||||||
|
04 May 2019 SF |
Maxime Hamou
Player
Naoki Tajima
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6
3
6
3
|
|||||||
Hamou VS Tajima Head to head matches stats
| stats | Maxime Hamou | Naoki Tajima |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Total Aces | 2 | 2 |
| Total Double Faults | 4 | 2 |
| Average Match Time | 1:9:0 | 1:9:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (31/59) | 49% (27/55) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 81% (25/31) | 70% (19/27) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 57% (16/28) | 46% (13/28) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/2) |
| Return Pts Won % | 42% (23/55) | 31% (18/59) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Maxime Hamou past matches
Before:
|
|
M15 Marrakech 2 | ||||||||
|
24 Mar 2022 R2 |
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
24 Mar 2022 R1 |
6
1
4
6
6
0
|
W
|
Maxime Hamou
Player
Walid Ahouda
78%
(
52 of
67)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
90)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
51 of
90)
92
Total Points Won
65
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M15 Marrakech 1 | ||||||||
|
18 Mar 2022 QF |
6
3
6
3
|
L
|
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Maxime Hamou
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
H2H | |||||
|
17 Mar 2022 R2 |
4
6
6
3
6
2
|
W
|
Maxime Hamou
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
66%
(
67 of
101)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
38 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
H2H | |||||
|
16 Mar 2022 R1 |
6
3
6
2
|
W
|
Maxime Hamou
Player
Noah Perfetti
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
80%
(
32 of
40)
1
Aces
3
-
Double Faults
-
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Naoki Tajima past matches
Before:
|
M15 Gimcheon | ||||||||
|
28 May 2026 R2 |
6
2
6
4
|
L
|
Sanhui Shin
Player
Naoki Tajima
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
H2H | |||||
|
27 May 2026 R1 |
6
3
4
6
6
2
|
W
|
Naoki Tajima
Player
Dongjae Kim
57%
(
51 of
89)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
7
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
83
|
H2H | |||||
|
25 May 2026 QF |
6
2
6
2
|
W
|
Naoki Tajima
Player
Chikaya Sato
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
H2H | |||||
|
25 May 2026 Q2 |
6
3
6
3
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M15 Nishi-Tokyo 1 | ||||||||
|
16 Mar 2026 Q1 |
6
2
6
1
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
view more
Hamou VS Tajima matches vs all opponents
| stats | Maxime Hamou | Naoki Tajima |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 52% (23/21) | 52% (128/120) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 52% (51/48) | 52% (286/268) |
| Games Won/Lost | 50% (483/477) | 51% (2580/2462) |
| Hard W/L | 52% (23/21) | 52% (128/120) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.26 | 0.28 |
| Total Aces | 123 | 677 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 | 0.29 |
| Total Double Faults | 126 | 708 |
| Average Match Time | 1:17:18 | 1:13:48 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 777.91 | 513.89 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1612/2639) | 54% (6580/12158) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 67% (1079/1612) | 68% (4471/6580) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (514/1027) | 47% (2633/5577) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 44% (109/246) | 48% (546/1142) |
| Return Points Won % | 40% (994/2497) | 40% (4796/12008) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 40% (4/6) | 21% (4/15) |
| Futures W/L | 58% (19/14) | 54% (124/105) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (23/43) | 52% (124/240) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/4) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 50% (8/16) | 63% (19/30) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 58% (7/12) | 47% (28/59) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 95% (20/19) | 87% (130/113) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 5% (20/1) | 13% (130/17) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (24/4) | 12% (118/14) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Hamou VS Tajima H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Kabbaj Vs Joint Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Makarska Open – Makarska – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Marcinko Vs Palicova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Makarska Open – Makarska – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Waltert Vs Garcia Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Makarska Open – Makarska – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Trungelliti Vs Hsu Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bad Rappenau Challenger – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Bartunkova Vs Knutson Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Birmingham Open – Birmingham – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Kabbaj Vs Joint Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Makarska Open – Makarska – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Marcinko Vs Palicova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Makarska Open – Makarska – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Waltert Vs Garcia Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Makarska Open – Makarska – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Trungelliti Vs Hsu Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bad Rappenau Challenger – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Bartunkova Vs Knutson Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Birmingham Open – Birmingham – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
