Mark Lajal vs Mitchell Krueger H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Lajal VS Krueger Head to Head: 1 - 0
The H2H record between Mark Lajal and Mitchell Krueger stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 29-05-2023 in the First Round at the Little Rock Challenger, Lajal got the win with 6-2 7-6(3). Lajal stands at no. 158 in the rankings, whilst Krueger is no. 270.
Mark Lajal
Ranking
158 ( 07-05-26)
Best Rank
145 ( 22-09-25)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
Mitchell Krueger
Ranking
270 ( 07-05-26)
Best Rank
135 ( 18-07-22)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
1
Total
0
1
Hard
0
0
Clay
0
0
Indoor
0
0
Grass
0
22 (12-05-2003)
Age
32 (12-01-1994)
191
Height
188
85
Weight
82
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Two-Handed
Backhand
Two-Handed
Karl Kiur Saar
Coach
Craig Kardon
Turned Pro
2012
61% (190-123)
Career Total W/L
52% (458-418)
64% (108-60)
Career Hard W/L
53% (281-247)
43% (13-17)
Career Clay W/L
56% (127-101)
63% (10-6)
Career Grass W/L
36% (10-18)
60% (59-40)
Career Indoor W/L
43% (40-52)
$129,380
Career Prize Money
$1,082,108
53% (9-8)
YTD Win/Loss
35% (6-11)
Lajal upcoming match (08-05-26)
Lajal VS Krueger H2H Matches played
|
Little Rock Challenger | ||||||||
|
29 May 2023 R1 |
Mark Lajal
Player
Mitchell Krueger
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
39 of
71)
6
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
6
2
7
6
|
|||||||
Lajal VS Krueger Head to head matches stats
| stats | Mark Lajal | Mitchell Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 8 |
| Total Aces | 6 | 4 |
| Total Double Faults | 2 | 1 |
| Average Match Time | 1:41:58 | 1:41:58 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (44/68) | 55% (39/71) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 73% (32/44) | 59% (23/39) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (13/24) | 56% (18/32) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 43% (3/7) | 50% (1/2) |
| Return Pts Won % | 42% (30/71) | 34% (23/68) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Mark Lajal past matches
Before:
|
|
Wuxi Challenger | ||||||||
|
06 May 2026 R2 |
7
6
6
7
7
6
|
W
|
Mark Lajal
Player
Mikhail Kukushkin
65%
(
103 of
158)
1st Serve %
66%
(
93 of
140)
18
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
77 of
103)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
68 of
93)
40%
(
22 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
6%
(
1 of
17)
37%
(
59 of
158)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
51 of
140)
150
Total Points Won
148
|
H2H | |||||
|
04 May 2026 R1 |
7
6
6
4
|
W
|
Mark Lajal
Player
Renta Tokuda
52%
(
43 of
82)
1st Serve %
69%
(
53 of
77)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
83
Total Points Won
76
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Jiujiang Challenger | ||||||||
|
01 May 2026 QF |
3
6
6
3
6
4
|
L
|
Fajing Sun
Player
Mark Lajal
56%
(
43 of
77)
1st Serve %
54%
(
47 of
87)
5
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
37 of
47)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
23 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
27 of
87)
81
Total Points Won
83
|
H2H | |||||
|
30 Apr 2026 R2 |
6
4
6
4
|
W
|
.jpg)
Mark Lajal
Player
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
52%
(
38 of
73)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
H2H | |||||
|
27 Apr 2026 R1 |
6
3
6
2
|
W
|
Mark Lajal
Player
Akira Santillan
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve %
48%
(
35 of
73)
4
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Mitchell Krueger past matches
Before:
|
Savannah Challenger | ||||||||
|
24 Apr 2026 QF |
7
6
7
6
|
L
|
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Mitchell Krueger
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
64%
(
57 of
89)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
89)
89
Total Points Won
73
|
H2H | |||||
|
23 Apr 2026 R2 |
6
2
6
7
6
2
|
W
|
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Braden Shick
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
46%
(
45 of
97)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
35 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
102
Total Points Won
87
|
H2H | |||||
|
21 Apr 2026 R1 |
6
7
7
6
6
4
|
W
|
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Michael Antonius
71%
(
81 of
114)
1st Serve %
63%
(
84 of
134)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
57 of
81)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
53 of
84)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
42 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
55 of
134)
127
Total Points Won
121
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Tallahassee Challenger | ||||||||
|
16 Apr 2026 R2 |
6
1
6
2
|
L
|
Tyler Zink
Player
Mitchell Krueger
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
30
|
H2H | |||||
|
14 Apr 2026 R1 |
2
6
6
3
6
4
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
view more
Lajal VS Krueger matches vs all opponents
| stats | Mark Lajal | Mitchell Krueger |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 64% (108/60) | 53% (281/247) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 62% (250/151) | 53% (664/588) |
| Games Won/Lost | 54% (2115/1769) | 51% (6160/5892) |
| Hard W/L | 64% (108/60) | 53% (281/247) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.42 | 0.34 |
| Total Aces | 802 | 2016 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 | 0.18 |
| Total Double Faults | 628 | 1088 |
| Average Match Time | 1:48:21 | 1:27:4 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 420.55 | 633.82 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (7511/12100) | 62% (19894/32085) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 72% (5413/7511) | 70% (13843/19894) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (2270/4595) | 51% (6234/12191) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 42% (524/1245) | 40% (1181/2939) |
| Return Points Won % | 41% (4936/12164) | 38% (12236/32156) |
| Slam W/L | 29% (2/5) | 56% (28/22) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 38% (12/20) |
| Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 50% (20/20) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 63% (59/34) | 51% (154/147) |
| Futures W/L | 71% (45/18) | 64% (67/38) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (106/166) | 53% (276/518) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) | 44% (4/9) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 56% (36/64) | 45% (83/183) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 46% (29/63) | 47% (86/184) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (110/92) | 82% (287/234) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (110/18) | 18% (287/53) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 28% (58/16) | 19% (241/46) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Lajal VS Krueger H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Selekhmeteva Vs Masarova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Internazionali BNL d’Italia – Rome – 6th May 2026 (Day 3)
-
Carreno-Busta Vs Tabilo Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Internazionali BNL d’Italia – Rome – 6th May 2026 (Day 3)
-
Starodubtseva Vs Waltert Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Internazionali BNL d’Italia – Rome – 6th May 2026 (Day 3)
-
Fearnley Vs Perricard Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Internazionali BNL d’Italia – Rome – 6th May 2026 (Day 3)
-
Siegemund Vs Bejlek Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Internazionali BNL d’Italia – Rome – 6th May 2026 (Day 3)
-
Selekhmeteva Vs Masarova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Internazionali BNL d’Italia – Rome – 6th May 2026 (Day 3)
-
Carreno-Busta Vs Tabilo Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Internazionali BNL d’Italia – Rome – 6th May 2026 (Day 3)
-
Starodubtseva Vs Waltert Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Internazionali BNL d’Italia – Rome – 6th May 2026 (Day 3)
-
Fearnley Vs Perricard Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Internazionali BNL d’Italia – Rome – 6th May 2026 (Day 3)
-
Siegemund Vs Bejlek Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Internazionali BNL d’Italia – Rome – 6th May 2026 (Day 3)
