Jui-Chen Hung vs Mitchell William Robins H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Hung VS Robins Head to Head: 1 - 0
The H2H record between Jui-Chen Hung and Mitchell William Robins stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 19-07-2016 in the First Round at the China F13, Hung got the win with 6-4 6-2. Hung stands at no. 868 in the rankings, whilst Robins is no. Ret..
Ranking
868 ( 02-07-26)
Best Rank
596 ( 07-12-15)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
1312 ( 01-12-14)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
Hung VS Robins H2H Matches played
|
|
China F13 | ||||||||
|
19 Jul 2016 R1 |
Jui-Chen Hung
Player
Mitchell William Robins
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
6
4
6
2
|
|||||||
Hung VS Robins Head to head matches stats
| stats | Jui-Chen Hung | Mitchell William Robins |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Total Aces | 2 | 2 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 5 |
| Average Match Time | 1:11:0 | 1:11:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 82% (41/50) | 62% (44/71) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 73% (30/41) | 52% (23/44) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (3/9) | 37% (10/27) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 33% (5/15) | 40% (2/5) |
| Return Pts Won % | 54% (38/71) | 34% (17/50) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Jui-Chen Hung past matches
|
|
M15 Gimcheon 1 | ||||||||
|
16 Nov 2025 Q1 |
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M25 Guiyang 1 | ||||||||
|
14 Sep 2025 Q1 |
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M25 Taipei 2 | ||||||||
|
24 Aug 2025 Q1 |
6
2
6
0
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M25 Tainan 1 | ||||||||
|
13 Aug 2023 Q1 |
3
6
6
2
10
8
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M15 Nanchang 1 | ||||||||
|
15 Sep 2019 Q2 |
6
4
6
4
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
view more
Mitchell William Robins past matches
|
|
Australia F10 | ||||||||
|
15 Nov 2016 R1 |
6
3
6
1
|
L
|
Maciej Smola
Player
Mitchell William Robins
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
H2H | |||||
|
14 Nov 2016 Q2 |
2
6
6
2
6
2
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
14 Nov 2016 QF |
6
3
1
6
6
3
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Australia F9 | ||||||||
|
07 Nov 2016 Q2 |
7
5
6
3
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Australia F8 | ||||||||
|
11 Oct 2016 R1 |
6
1
7
6
|
L
|
Nathan Pasha
Player
Mitchell William Robins
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
51 of
81)
10
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
81)
82
Total Points Won
61
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Hung VS Robins matches vs all opponents
| stats | Jui-Chen Hung | Mitchell William Robins |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 42% (104/143) | 56% (23/18) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 43% (244/322) | 58% (53/39) |
| Games Won/Lost | 48% (2481/2684) | 54% (439/369) |
| Hard W/L | 42% (104/143) | 56% (23/18) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.08 | 0.05 |
| Total Aces | 191 | 21 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.09 | 0.04 |
| Total Double Faults | 228 | 15 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 1067.41 | 846.68 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (4358/6595) | 63% (544/868) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 62% (2713/4358) | 60% (328/544) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (1088/2237) | 48% (155/324) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 41% (254/618) | 46% (21/46) |
| Return Points Won % | 39% (2478/6377) | 34% (244/719) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 35% (9/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 43% (91/123) | 56% (23/18) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 41% (96/235) | 56% (23/41) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 50% (24/48) | 43% (3/7) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 48% (32/67) | 30% (3/10) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (103/82) | 81% (27/22) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (103/21) | 19% (27/5) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (144/20) | 7% (14/1) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Hung VS Robins H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Cirstea Vs Birrell Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Serrano Vs Noskova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Serrano Vs Noskova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Khachanov Vs Hanfmann Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Mensik Vs Dimitrov Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Cirstea Vs Birrell Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Serrano Vs Noskova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Serrano Vs Noskova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Khachanov Vs Hanfmann Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Mensik Vs Dimitrov Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
