John Lamble vs Tadiwa Chinamo H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Lamble VS Chinamo Head to Head: 1 - 0
The H2H record between John Lamble and Tadiwa Chinamo stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 05-07-2016 in the First Round at the Zimbabwe F3, Lamble got the win with 1-6 6-4 7-6(3). Lamble stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Chinamo is no. Ret..
John Lamble
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
781 ( 12-06-17)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
Tadiwa Chinamo
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
1606 ( 02-07-18)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
1
Total
0
1
Hard
0
0
Clay
0
0
Indoor
0
0
Grass
0
34 (31-03-1992)
Age
28 (18-04-1998)
183
Height
79
Weight
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Two-Handed
Backhand
Two-Handed
Coach
Turned Pro
58% (146-105)
Career Total W/L
38% (5-8)
60% (135-89)
Career Hard W/L
30% (3-7)
44% (8-10)
Career Clay W/L
67% (2-1)
0% (0-0)
Career Grass W/L
0% (0-0)
33% (3-6)
Career Indoor W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0% (0-0)
YTD Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
Lamble VS Chinamo H2H Matches played
|
Zimbabwe F3 | ||||||||
|
05 Jul 2016 R1 |
John Lamble
Player
Tadiwa Chinamo
60%
(
61 of
102)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
98)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
44%
(
45 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
1
6
6
4
7
6
|
|||||||
Lamble VS Chinamo Head to head matches stats
| stats | John Lamble | Tadiwa Chinamo |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 14 | 16 |
| Total Aces | 0 | 1 |
| Total Double Faults | 5 | 6 |
| Average Match Time | 2:28:0 | 2:28:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (61/102) | 61% (60/98) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 61% (37/61) | 60% (36/60) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (20/41) | 42% (16/38) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 36% (4/11) | 33% (6/18) |
| Return Pts Won % | 47% (46/98) | 44% (45/102) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
John Lamble past matches
Before:
|
|
Mexico F2 (Mexico City) | ||||||||
|
15 May 2018 QF |
6
2
6
2
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
15 May 2018 R1 |
7
5
6
2
|
L
|
Jorge Brian Panta Herreros
Player
John Lamble
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
H2H | |||||
|
14 May 2018 Q2 |
6
2
6
2
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
12 May 2018 Q1 |
6
2
6
1
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Mexico F1 (Morelia) | ||||||||
|
09 May 2018 R2 |
4
6
7
5
6
2
|
L
|
Pavel Krainik
Player
John Lamble
47%
(
40 of
85)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
6
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
7
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Tadiwa Chinamo past matches
Before:
|
|
Stockton Challenger | ||||||||
|
30 Sep 2017 Q1 |
4
6
6
2
6
0
|
L
|
Collin Altamirano
Player
Tadiwa Chinamo
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve %
71%
(
68 of
96)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
49 of
96)
93
Total Points Won
70
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Zimbabwe F3 (Harare) | ||||||||
|
28 Jun 2017 R2 |
6
0
6
1
|
L
|
Matias Franco Descotte
Player
Tadiwa Chinamo
44%
(
18 of
41)
1st Serve %
67%
(
22 of
33)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
52
Total Points Won
22
|
H2H | |||||
|
26 Jun 2017 R1 |
7
5
4
6
6
4
|
W
|
Tadiwa Chinamo
Player
Timothy Dollman
69%
(
69 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
70 of
116)
1
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
1
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
47 of
70)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
38%
(
38 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
48 of
116)
110
Total Points Won
106
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Zimbabwe F2 (Harare) | ||||||||
|
20 Jun 2017 R1 |
6
4
3
6
6
2
|
L
|
Thales Turini
Player
Tadiwa Chinamo
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
82%
(
60 of
73)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
80
Total Points Won
74
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Zimbabwe F1 (Harare) | ||||||||
|
13 Jun 2017 R1 |
7
5
6
3
|
L
|
Thomas Setodji
Player
Tadiwa Chinamo
53%
(
41 of
78)
1st Serve %
72%
(
47 of
65)
3
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
5
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Lamble VS Chinamo matches vs all opponents
| stats | John Lamble | Tadiwa Chinamo |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 60% (135/89) | 30% (3/7) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 60% (300/202) | 38% (9/15) |
| Games Won/Lost | 55% (2437/2010) | 45% (100/124) |
| Hard W/L | 60% (135/89) | 30% (3/7) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.08 | 0.04 |
| Total Aces | 170 | 4 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 | 0.25 |
| Total Double Faults | 340 | 28 |
| Average Match Time | 1st Match | 1:24:4 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 915.12 | 1079.9 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (3685/6256) | 72% (420/580) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 65% (2393/3685) | 58% (244/420) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (1234/2570) | 38% (60/160) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 43% (268/623) | 33% (22/66) |
| Return Points Won % | 41% (2565/6333) | 39% (239/613) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 29% (5/12) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 63% (130/77) | 33% (3/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (135/223) | 30% (3/10) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 53% (24/45) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 45% (24/53) | 25% (1/4) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (139/126) | 60% (5/3) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (139/13) | 40% (5/2) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (85/9) | 0% (5/0) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Lamble VS Chinamo H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Cirstea Vs Birrell Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Serrano Vs Noskova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Serrano Vs Noskova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Khachanov Vs Hanfmann Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Mensik Vs Dimitrov Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Cirstea Vs Birrell Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Serrano Vs Noskova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Serrano Vs Noskova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Khachanov Vs Hanfmann Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Mensik Vs Dimitrov Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
