Jesper De Jong vs Nerman Fatic H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com

By James Morris

Jong VS Fatic Head to Head: 1 - 0

The H2H record between Jesper De Jong and Nerman Fatic stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 22-04-2024 in the First Round at the Rome Challenger, Jong got the win with 3-6 7-6(6) 4-1 ret.. Jong stands at no. 109 in the rankings, whilst Fatic is no. 236.

Jong vs Fatic Prediction H2H
NED
Jesper De Jong

Ranking

109 ( 23-05-26)

Best Rank

71 ( 05-01-26)

trophyatp Titles

0

trophyatp Titles

0

trophy Grand Slams

0

trophy Masters

0

trophy Main Tour

0

Recent Form

L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
Jong vs Fatic Prediction H2H
BIH
Nerman Fatic

Ranking

236 ( 23-05-26)

Best Rank

191 ( 07-08-23)

trophyatp Titles

0

trophyatp Titles

0

trophy Grand Slams

0

trophy Masters

0

trophy Main Tour

0

Recent Form

W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L

1

Total

0

0

Hard

0

1

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

Jong VS Fatic H2H Matches played

Clay Rome Challenger

22 Apr

2024

R1

cross
Jesper De Jong
Player
Nerman Fatic
57% ( 49 of 86)
1st Serve %
70% ( 58 of 83)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
78% ( 38 of 49)
1st Serve Won
71% ( 41 of 58)
51% ( 19 of 37)
2nd Serve Won
56% ( 14 of 25)
20% ( 1 of 5)
Break Points Won
67% ( 2 of 3)
34% ( 29 of 86)
Rtn Points Won
34% ( 28 of 83)
85
Total Points Won
84
3 6
7 6
4 1

Jong VS Fatic Head to head matches stats

stats Jesper De Jong Nerman Fatic
All Head to Head Matches 1 0
Sets Won 2 1
Games Won 14 13
Total Aces 3 5
Total Double Faults 2 1
Average Match Time 2:26:56 2:26:56
1st Serve % 57% (49/86) 70% (58/83)
1st Serve Win % 78% (38/49) 71% (41/58)
2nd Serve Win % 51% (19/37) 56% (14/25)
Total Break Points Won % 20% (1/5) 67% (2/3)
Return Pts Won % 34% (28/83) 34% (29/86)
Best of 3 Sets Win % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win % 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
Total Tiebreaks Win % 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
Deciding Set Win % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match 0% (0/0) 0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match 0% (0/0) 100% (1/1)
1st Set Lost, Won Match 100% (1/1) 0% (0/0)

Jesper De Jong past matches

Clay French Open - Paris

21 May

2026

QF

7 5
6 3
L
cross
Michael Zheng
Player
Jesper De Jong
56% ( 34 of 61)
1st Serve %
60% ( 48 of 80)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
79% ( 27 of 34)
1st Serve Won
69% ( 33 of 48)
59% ( 16 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 13 of 32)
27% ( 3 of 11)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 3)
30% ( 18 of 61)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 34 of 80)
77
Total Points Won
64
H2H

20 May

2026

Q2

4 6
6 1
6 3
W
cross
Jesper De Jong
Player
Liam Draxl
60% ( 41 of 68)
1st Serve %
70% ( 69 of 99)
12
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
76% ( 31 of 41)
1st Serve Won
54% ( 37 of 69)
67% ( 18 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 15 of 30)
33% ( 5 of 15)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
28% ( 19 of 68)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 47 of 99)
96
Total Points Won
71
H2H

18 May

2026

Q1

7 6
7 6
W
cross
Jesper De Jong
Player
Fajing Sun
56% ( 45 of 80)
1st Serve %
67% ( 47 of 70)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
78% ( 35 of 45)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 30 of 47)
40% ( 14 of 35)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 11 of 23)
100% ( 3 of 3)
Break Points Won
75% ( 3 of 4)
39% ( 31 of 80)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 29 of 70)
78
Total Points Won
72
H2H
Clay Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome

06 May

2026

R1

6 3
6 0
L
cross
Nuno Borges
Player
Jesper De Jong
61% ( 23 of 38)
1st Serve %
70% ( 37 of 53)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
91% ( 21 of 23)
1st Serve Won
51% ( 19 of 37)
53% ( 8 of 15)
2nd Serve Won
31% ( 5 of 16)
50% ( 5 of 10)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
24% ( 9 of 38)
Rtn Points Won
55% ( 29 of 53)
58
Total Points Won
33
H2H

05 May

2026

QF

4 6
6 2
7 6
W
cross
Jesper De Jong
Player
Hugo Dellien
55% ( 59 of 108)
1st Serve %
67% ( 69 of 103)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
64% ( 38 of 59)
1st Serve Won
57% ( 39 of 69)
57% ( 28 of 49)
2nd Serve Won
59% ( 20 of 34)
44% ( 4 of 9)
Break Points Won
23% ( 3 of 13)
39% ( 42 of 108)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 44 of 103)
110
Total Points Won
101
H2H

Nerman Fatic past matches

Clay French Open - Paris

20 May

2026

Q2

2 6
6 3
7 6
L
cross
Kyrian Jacquet
Player
Nerman Fatic
66% ( 70 of 106)
1st Serve %
72% ( 76 of 106)
3
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
1
69% ( 48 of 70)
1st Serve Won
68% ( 52 of 76)
42% ( 15 of 36)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 13 of 30)
43% ( 3 of 7)
Break Points Won
50% ( 4 of 8)
41% ( 43 of 106)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 41 of 106)
104
Total Points Won
108
H2H

19 May

2026

Q1

6 4
6 4
W
cross
Nerman Fatic
Player
Luka Mikrut
70% ( 38 of 54)
1st Serve %
69% ( 47 of 68)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
79% ( 30 of 38)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 30 of 47)
69% ( 11 of 16)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 10 of 21)
50% ( 2 of 4)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
24% ( 13 of 54)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 28 of 68)
69
Total Points Won
53
H2H
Clay Zagreb Challenger

13 May

2026

R1

6 3
6 7
6 1
L
cross
Elmer Moller
Player
Nerman Fatic
67% ( 68 of 101)
1st Serve %
65% ( 60 of 92)
2
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
66% ( 45 of 68)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 35 of 60)
58% ( 19 of 33)
2nd Serve Won
47% ( 15 of 32)
45% ( 5 of 11)
Break Points Won
29% ( 2 of 7)
37% ( 37 of 101)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 42 of 92)
106
Total Points Won
87
H2H

11 May

2026

QF

7 5
6 0
W
cross
Nerman Fatic
Player
Dimitar Kuzmanov
76% ( 39 of 51)
1st Serve %
70% ( 43 of 61)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
64% ( 25 of 39)
1st Serve Won
56% ( 24 of 43)
58% ( 7 of 12)
2nd Serve Won
22% ( 4 of 18)
40% ( 6 of 15)
Break Points Won
67% ( 2 of 3)
37% ( 19 of 51)
Rtn Points Won
54% ( 33 of 61)
65
Total Points Won
47
H2H

10 May

2026

Q1

6 3
6 4
W
cross
Nerman Fatic
Player
Joshua Sheehy
46% ( 24 of 52)
1st Serve %
60% ( 35 of 58)
2
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
83% ( 20 of 24)
1st Serve Won
71% ( 25 of 35)
64% ( 18 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 10 of 23)
33% ( 3 of 9)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
27% ( 14 of 52)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 23 of 58)
61
Total Points Won
49
H2H

Jong VS Fatic matches vs all opponents

stats Jesper De Jong Nerman Fatic
YTD Win/Loss 64% (94/52) 51% (43/42)
Sets Won/Lost 62% (208/127) 53% (97/86)
Games Won/Lost 56% (1760/1400) 51% (852/803)
Hard W/L 64% (94/52) 51% (43/42)
Clay W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Indoor Hard W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Grass W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces Per Game 0.43 0.22
Total Aces 666 178
Double Faults Per Game 0.26 0.21
Total Double Faults 403 168
Average Match Time 1:35:3 1st Match
Average Opponent Rank 565.87 1040.56
1st Serve % 60% (5627/9365) 64% (2063/3216)
1st Serve Win % 72% (4026/5627) 66% (1365/2063)
2nd Serve Win % 51% (1909/3738) 47% (538/1153)
Total Break Points Won % 43% (438/1018) 46% (146/318)
Return Points Won % 41% (3932/9519) 40% (1213/3045)
Slam W/L 61% (14/9) 25% (1/3)
Masters W/L 67% (2/1) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/2)
Main Tour W/L 17% (1/5) 0% (0/1)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 56% (22/17) 45% (5/6)
Futures W/L 73% (55/20) 55% (37/30)
Best of 3 Sets Win % 65% (89/137) 53% (42/79)
Best of 5 Sets Win % 25% (1/4) 0% (0/0)
Total Tiebreaks Win % 52% (25/48) 56% (9/16)
Deciding Set Win % 48% (20/42) 40% (8/20)
1st Set Won, Won Match 83% (95/79) 85% (47/40)
1st Set Won, Lost Match 17% (95/16) 11% (47/5)
1st Set Lost, Won Match 29% (51/15) 11% (38/4)
banner

Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.

Jong & Fatic Last Match Highlights

YouTube video

SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Jong VS Fatic H2H

UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS

You Might Also Like