Jasper Smit vs Ante Pavic H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com

By James Morris

Smit VS Pavic Head to Head: 1 - 0

The H2H record between Jasper Smit and Ante Pavic stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 05-07-2010 in the Q2 round Round at the Scheveningen Challenger, Smit got the win with 7-6(6) 6-4. Smit stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Pavic is no. Ret..

Smit vs Pavic Prediction H2H
NED
Jasper Smit

Ranking

Ret.

Best Rank

413 ( 08-11-04)

trophyatp Titles

0

trophyatp Titles

0

trophy Grand Slams

0

trophy Masters

0

trophy Main Tour

0

Recent Form

L
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
Smit vs Pavic Prediction H2H
CRO
Ante Pavic

Ranking

Ret.

Best Rank

132 ( 13-10-14)

trophyatp Titles

0

trophyatp Titles

0

trophy Grand Slams

0

trophy Masters

0

trophy Main Tour

0

Recent Form

W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L

1

Total

0

0

Hard

0

1

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

Smit VS Pavic H2H Matches played

Smit VS Pavic Head to head matches stats

stats Jasper Smit Ante Pavic
All Head to Head Matches 1 0
Sets Won 2 0
Games Won 13 10
Total Aces 0 0
Total Double Faults 0 0
Average Match Time 0:0:0 0:0:0
1st Serve % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st Serve Win % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
2nd Serve Win % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Total Break Points Won % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Return Pts Won % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets Win % 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Total Tiebreaks Win % 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
Deciding Set Win % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match 100% (1/1) 0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match 0% (1/0) 0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match 0% (0/0) 0% (1/0)

Jasper Smit past matches

Clay Scheveningen Challenger

09 Jul

2010

QF

6 7
6 3
6 4
L
cross
Steve Darcis
Player
Jasper Smit
49% ( 47 of 96)
1st Serve %
55% ( 52 of 94)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
74% ( 35 of 47)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 31 of 52)
57% ( 28 of 49)
2nd Serve Won
52% ( 22 of 42)
46% ( 6 of 13)
Break Points Won
67% ( 4 of 6)
34% ( 33 of 96)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 41 of 94)
104
Total Points Won
86
H2H

08 Jul

2010

R2

3 6
6 3
7 6
W
cross
Jasper Smit
Player
Pablo Cuevas
56% ( 61 of 109)
1st Serve %
60% ( 47 of 78)
4
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
3
75% ( 46 of 61)
1st Serve Won
83% ( 39 of 47)
50% ( 24 of 48)
2nd Serve Won
65% ( 20 of 31)
100% ( 1 of 1)
Break Points Won
20% ( 1 of 5)
36% ( 39 of 109)
Rtn Points Won
24% ( 19 of 78)
89
Total Points Won
98
H2H

06 Jul

2010

R1

6 4
6 4
W
cross
Jasper Smit
Player
Diego Junqueira
59% ( 32 of 54)
1st Serve %
68% ( 52 of 77)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
72% ( 23 of 32)
1st Serve Won
62% ( 32 of 52)
64% ( 14 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 12 of 25)
27% ( 3 of 11)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
31% ( 17 of 54)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 33 of 77)
70
Total Points Won
61
H2H

05 Jul

2010

QF

7 6
6 4
W
H2H

05 Jul

2010

Q2

7 6
6 4
W
H2H

Ante Pavic past matches

I.hard Cleveland Challenger

14 Mar

2021

Q1

6 7
6 4
1 0
L
cross
Dennis Novikov
Player
Ante Pavic
57% ( 43 of 76)
1st Serve %
61% ( 44 of 72)
10
Aces
14
1
Double Faults
5
79% ( 34 of 43)
1st Serve Won
91% ( 40 of 44)
70% ( 23 of 33)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 14 of 28)
50% ( 1 of 2)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
25% ( 19 of 76)
Rtn Points Won
25% ( 18 of 72)
75
Total Points Won
73
H2H
Clay Barcelona Challenger

02 Oct

2019

R2

6 4
7 6
L
cross
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Ante Pavic
55% ( 39 of 71)
1st Serve %
44% ( 37 of 85)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
6
77% ( 30 of 39)
1st Serve Won
78% ( 29 of 37)
63% ( 20 of 32)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 24 of 48)
18% ( 2 of 11)
Break Points Won
20% ( 1 of 5)
30% ( 21 of 71)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 32 of 85)
82
Total Points Won
74
H2H
Clay L'Aquila Challenger

20 Aug

2019

R1

6 3
6 2
L
cross
Guilherme Clezar
Player
Ante Pavic
72% ( 34 of 47)
1st Serve %
49% ( 27 of 55)
4
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
5
76% ( 26 of 34)
1st Serve Won
81% ( 22 of 27)
69% ( 9 of 13)
2nd Serve Won
18% ( 5 of 28)
44% ( 4 of 9)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
26% ( 12 of 47)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 28 of 55)
63
Total Points Won
39
H2H
Clay Cordenons Challenger

12 Aug

2019

R1

6 3
6 2
L
cross
Alejandro Gonzalez
Player
Ante Pavic
73% ( 44 of 60)
1st Serve %
52% ( 28 of 54)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
70% ( 31 of 44)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 18 of 28)
44% ( 7 of 16)
2nd Serve Won
35% ( 9 of 26)
83% ( 5 of 6)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
37% ( 22 of 60)
Rtn Points Won
50% ( 27 of 54)
65
Total Points Won
49
H2H
Clay Manerbio Challenger

05 Aug

2019

R1

7 6
L
cross
Sadio Doumbia
Player
Ante Pavic
72% ( 31 of 43)
1st Serve %
39% ( 16 of 41)
5
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
2
77% ( 24 of 31)
1st Serve Won
81% ( 13 of 16)
50% ( 6 of 12)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 11 of 25)
33% ( 1 of 3)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
30% ( 13 of 43)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 17 of 41)
47
Total Points Won
37
H2H

Smit VS Pavic matches vs all opponents

stats Jasper Smit Ante Pavic
YTD Win/Loss 56% (41/32) 57% (125/95)
Sets Won/Lost 53% (92/83) 55% (276/226)
Games Won/Lost 52% (864/804) 52% (2563/2360)
Hard W/L 56% (41/32) 57% (125/95)
Clay W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Indoor Hard W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Grass W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces Per Game 0 0.41
Total Aces 0 989
Double Faults Per Game 0 0.2
Total Double Faults 0 473
Average Opponent Rank 1227.92 1032.25
1st Serve % 0% (0/0) 58% (4769/8187)
1st Serve Win % 0% (0/0) 75% (3572/4769)
2nd Serve Win % 0% (0/0) 48% (1648/3418)
Total Break Points Won % 0% (0/0) 35% (232/669)
Return Points Won % 0% (0/0) 35% (2882/8144)
Slam W/L 0% (0/0) 17% (1/5)
Masters W/L 0% (0/0) 33% (1/2)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 67% (2/1) 55% (6/5)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 48% (11/12) 49% (51/53)
Futures W/L 60% (28/19) 69% (66/30)
Best of 3 Sets Win % 55% (39/71) 56% (122/216)
Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Total Tiebreaks Win % 41% (9/22) 50% (48/96)
Deciding Set Win % 61% (19/31) 56% (37/66)
1st Set Won, Won Match 83% (35/29) 89% (117/104)
1st Set Won, Lost Match 17% (35/6) 11% (117/13)
1st Set Lost, Won Match 32% (38/12) 20% (103/21)
banner

Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.

Smit & Pavic Last Match Highlights

YouTube video

SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Smit VS Pavic H2H

UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS

You Might Also Like