Jason Jung vs Finn Tearney H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Jung VS Tearney Head to Head: 1 - 0
The H2H record between Jason Jung and Finn Tearney stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 25-06-2016 in the Semifinals Round at the Canada F3, Jung got the win with 7-5 6-1. Jung stands at no. 856 in the rankings, whilst Tearney is no. Ret..
Ranking
856 ( 07-07-26)
Best Rank
114 ( 30-07-18)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
356 ( 10-10-16)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Jung upcoming match (07-07-26)
Jung VS Tearney H2H Matches played
|
|
Canada F3 | ||||||||
|
25 Jun 2016 SF |
Jason Jung
Player
Finn Tearney
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
48
|
7
5
6
1
|
|||||||
Jung VS Tearney Head to head matches stats
| stats | Jason Jung | Finn Tearney |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 6 |
| Total Aces | 6 | 1 |
| Total Double Faults | 4 | 3 |
| Average Match Time | 1:18:0 | 1:18:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (34/56) | 63% (41/65) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 85% (29/34) | 63% (26/41) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (10/22) | 21% (5/24) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 63% (5/8) | 50% (2/4) |
| Return Pts Won % | 52% (34/65) | 30% (17/56) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Jason Jung past matches
|
|
Newport Challenger | ||||||||
|
05 Jul 2026 Q1 |
7
6
3
6
6
4
|
W
|
Jason Jung
Player
Andres Martin
60%
(
60 of
100)
1st Serve %
63%
(
62 of
99)
7
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
4
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
42%
(
42 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
100
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Bratislava Challenger | ||||||||
|
09 Jun 2026 R1 |
6
3
6
1
|
L
|
Zdenek Kolar
Player
Jason Jung
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Wuxi Challenger | ||||||||
|
05 May 2026 R1 |
6
4
6
4
|
L
|
Andre Ilagan
Player
Jason Jung
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Jiujiang Challenger | ||||||||
|
29 Apr 2026 R1 |
6
2
3
6
6
3
|
L
|
Giles Hussey
Player
Jason Jung
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
83%
(
65 of
78)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
35 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
73
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Gwangju Challenger | ||||||||
|
21 Apr 2026 R1 |
6
3
6
4
|
L
|
Hyeon Chung
Player
Jason Jung
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
57
Total Points Won
45
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Finn Tearney past matches
|
|
Davis Cup, World Group I, PO, NZL-VEN 3-1 | ||||||||
|
06 Mar 2020 Rubber 1 |
6
4
6
4
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M15 Te Anau 1 | ||||||||
|
02 Jan 2020 R2 |
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
31 Dec 2019 R1 |
6
2
6
4
|
W
|
Finn Tearney
Player
Anton Shepp
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
0
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M25 Shenzhen 1 | ||||||||
|
12 Jun 2019 R1 |
6
2
6
4
|
L
|
Ye Cong Mo
Player
Finn Tearney
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
36
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M25 Hong Kong 2 | ||||||||
|
06 Jun 2019 R2 |
6
4
6
4
|
L
|
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Finn Tearney
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
53 of
76)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
9
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
48%
(
29 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Jung VS Tearney matches vs all opponents
| stats | Jason Jung | Finn Tearney |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 58% (308/226) | 59% (136/93) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 57% (698/530) | 58% (297/214) |
| Games Won/Lost | 53% (6121/5490) | 54% (2461/2139) |
| Hard W/L | 58% (308/226) | 59% (136/93) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.22 | 0.13 |
| Total Aces | 1270 | 292 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 | 0.3 |
| Total Double Faults | 1150 | 667 |
| Average Match Time | 1:9:29 | 1st Match |
| Average Opponent Rank | 794.53 | 970.04 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (16864/26939) | 62% (5687/9164) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 68% (11549/16864) | 66% (3740/5687) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (5151/10075) | 46% (1592/3477) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 41% (1141/2795) | 46% (525/1132) |
| Return Points Won % | 40% (11029/27605) | 45% (4115/9225) |
| Slam W/L | 33% (4/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 20% (2/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 40% (2/3) | 33% (1/2) |
| Main Tour W/L | 44% (19/24) | 25% (2/6) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 56% (180/140) | 51% (22/21) |
| Futures W/L | 70% (101/43) | 63% (111/64) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (305/517) | 61% (131/214) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 8% (1/12) | 57% (4/7) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 57% (90/159) | 60% (32/53) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 52% (78/150) | 55% (30/55) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (314/270) | 89% (128/114) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (314/44) | 10% (128/13) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (219/37) | 21% (100/21) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Jung VS Tearney H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Royer Vs Neuchrist Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Iasi Challenger – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Marcinko Vs Burel Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Grand Est Open 88 – Contrexeville – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Aliassime Vs Djokovic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 7th July 2026 (Day 9)
-
Kotliar Vs Selekhmeteva Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Grand Est Open 88 – Contrexeville – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Seidel Vs Kulikova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA W50 Corroios-Seixal – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Royer Vs Neuchrist Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Iasi Challenger – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Marcinko Vs Burel Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Grand Est Open 88 – Contrexeville – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Aliassime Vs Djokovic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 7th July 2026 (Day 9)
-
Kotliar Vs Selekhmeteva Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Grand Est Open 88 – Contrexeville – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
-
Seidel Vs Kulikova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA W50 Corroios-Seixal – 7th July 2026 (Day 2)
