Issam Haitham Taweel vs Dane Dunlap H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Taweel VS Dunlap Head to Head: 1 - 0
The H2H record between Issam Haitham Taweel and Dane Dunlap stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 03-08-2017 in the Second Round at the Egypt F23 (Cairo), Taweel got the win with 3-6 6-3 7-6(9). Taweel stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Dunlap is no. Ret..
Issam Haitham Taweel
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
635 ( 16-06-14)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
Dane Dunlap
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
1663 ( 05-03-18)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
1
Total
0
0
Hard
0
1
Clay
0
0
Indoor
0
0
Grass
0
36 (10-07-1989)
Age
28 (12-08-1997)
Height
Weight
Plays
Backhand
Coach
Turned Pro
41% (184-270)
Career Total W/L
49% (21-22)
38% (101-166)
Career Hard W/L
50% (13-13)
44% (83-104)
Career Clay W/L
47% (8-9)
0% (0-0)
Career Grass W/L
0% (0-0)
0% (0-0)
Career Indoor W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0% (0-0)
YTD Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
Taweel VS Dunlap H2H Matches played
|
Egypt F23 (Cairo) | ||||||||
|
03 Aug 2017 R2 |
Issam Haitham Taweel
Player
Dane Dunlap
56%
(
55 of
98)
1st Serve %
74%
(
72 of
97)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
43 of
72)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
41 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
97
Total Points Won
98
|
3
6
6
3
7
6
|
|||||||
Taweel VS Dunlap Head to head matches stats
| stats | Issam Haitham Taweel | Dane Dunlap |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 15 |
| Total Aces | 3 | 2 |
| Total Double Faults | 6 | 3 |
| Average Match Time | 2:27:0 | 2:27:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (55/98) | 74% (72/97) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 69% (38/55) | 60% (43/72) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (19/43) | 56% (14/25) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 50% (4/8) | 40% (4/10) |
| Return Pts Won % | 41% (40/97) | 42% (41/98) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Issam Haitham Taweel past matches
Before:
|
M15 Sharm El Sheikh 12 | ||||||||
|
12 Apr 2019 QF |
6
4
6
4
|
L
|
Jakub Paul
Player
Issam Haitham Taweel
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
46%
(
32 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
68
|
H2H | |||||
|
11 Apr 2019 R2 |
6
3
2
6
6
2
|
W
|
Issam Haitham Taweel
Player
Mattia Bellucci
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
28 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
74
|
H2H | |||||
|
10 Apr 2019 R1 |
7
6
6
3
|
W
|
Issam Haitham Taweel
Player
Niklas Johansson
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
11
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
5
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M15 Sharm El Sheikh 10 | ||||||||
|
25 Mar 2019 Q1 |
6
0
7
6
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M15 Sharm El Sheikh 9 | ||||||||
|
18 Mar 2019 Q1 |
6
1
6
4
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
view more
Dane Dunlap past matches
Before:
|
|
Canada F4 (Kelowna) | ||||||||
|
25 Jun 2018 QF |
6
0
6
4
|
L
|
Jake Douglas
Player
Dane Dunlap
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
75%
(
47 of
63)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
21 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
H2H | |||||
|
24 Jun 2018 Q2 |
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Canada F3 (Calgary) | ||||||||
|
19 Jun 2018 R1 |
7
5
3
6
6
3
|
L
|
A.j. Catanzariti
Player
Dane Dunlap
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
84)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
30 of
84)
87
Total Points Won
80
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Egypt F23 (Cairo) | ||||||||
|
03 Aug 2017 R2 |
3
6
6
3
7
6
|
L
|
Issam Haitham Taweel
Player
Dane Dunlap
56%
(
55 of
98)
1st Serve %
74%
(
72 of
97)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
43 of
72)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
41 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
97
Total Points Won
98
|
H2H | |||||
|
02 Aug 2017 R1 |
6
2
6
1
|
W
|
Dane Dunlap
Player
Adham Gaber
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
9
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Taweel VS Dunlap matches vs all opponents
| stats | Issam Haitham Taweel | Dane Dunlap |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 38% (101/166) | 50% (13/13) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 39% (238/366) | 51% (30/29) |
| Games Won/Lost | 46% (2554/2997) | 51% (263/254) |
| Hard W/L | 38% (101/166) | 50% (13/13) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.16 | 0.03 |
| Total Aces | 430 | 8 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 | 0.01 |
| Total Double Faults | 376 | 3 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 1107.91 | 938.23 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (5113/8054) | 73% (107/147) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 65% (3319/5113) | 58% (62/107) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (1347/2941) | 48% (19/40) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 37% (239/651) | 57% (4/7) |
| Return Points Won % | 36% (2751/7670) | 36% (47/132) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 38% (100/163) | 50% (13/13) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 38% (99/262) | 50% (13/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 44% (28/64) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 50% (34/68) | 43% (3/7) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (101/85) | 85% (13/11) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (101/16) | 15% (13/2) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (166/17) | 15% (13/2) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Taweel VS Dunlap H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Halys Vs Perricard Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bordeaux Challenger – 15th May 2026 (Day 5)
-
Carreno-Busta Vs Clar Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Valencia Challenger – 15th May 2026 (Day 5)
-
Serrano Vs Krejcikova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Parma Ladies Open – Parma – 15th May 2026 (Day 5)
-
Seidel Vs Persson Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA W75 Zagreb – 15th May 2026 (Day 5)
-
Volynets Vs Starodubtseva Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Trophee Clarins – Paris – 15th May 2026 (Day 5)
-
Halys Vs Perricard Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bordeaux Challenger – 15th May 2026 (Day 5)
-
Carreno-Busta Vs Clar Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Valencia Challenger – 15th May 2026 (Day 5)
-
Serrano Vs Krejcikova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Parma Ladies Open – Parma – 15th May 2026 (Day 5)
-
Seidel Vs Persson Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA W75 Zagreb – 15th May 2026 (Day 5)
-
Volynets Vs Starodubtseva Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Trophee Clarins – Paris – 15th May 2026 (Day 5)
