Ilya Ivashka vs Bastian Trinker H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Ivashka VS Trinker Head to Head: 1 - 0
The H2H record between Ilya Ivashka and Bastian Trinker stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 12-05-2016 in the First Round at the Samarkand Challenger, Ivashka got the win with 6-1 6-0. Ivashka stands at no. 722 in the rankings, whilst Trinker is no. Ret..
Ranking
722 ( 17-05-26)
Best Rank
40 ( 20-06-22)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
1
Recent Form
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
241 ( 21-12-15)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
Ivashka upcoming match (19-05-26)
Ivashka VS Trinker H2H Matches played
|
|
Samarkand Challenger | ||||||||
|
12 May 2016 R1 |
Ilya Ivashka
Player
Bastian Trinker
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve %
53%
(
21 of
40)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
7 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
51
Total Points Won
21
|
6
1
6
0
|
|||||||
Ivashka VS Trinker Head to head matches stats
| stats | Ilya Ivashka | Bastian Trinker |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 1 |
| Total Aces | 2 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 2 | 6 |
| Average Match Time | 0:43:36 | 0:43:36 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (22/32) | 53% (21/40) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 86% (19/22) | 43% (9/21) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 60% (6/10) | 26% (5/19) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 55% (6/11) | 0% (0/2) |
| Return Pts Won % | 65% (26/40) | 22% (7/32) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Ilya Ivashka past matches
|
|
Bengaluru 2 Challenger | ||||||||
|
15 May 2026 SF |
6
4
6
4
|
L
|
Keegan Smith
Player
Ilya Ivashka
85%
(
50 of
59)
1st Serve %
62%
(
51 of
82)
14
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
82)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
H2H | |||||
|
14 May 2026 QF |
6
3
6
3
|
W
|
Ilya Ivashka
Player
Manish Sureshkumar
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
93%
(
28 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
H2H | |||||
|
13 May 2026 R2 |
6
1
6
2
|
W
|
Ilya Ivashka
Player
Kokoro Isomura
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
10
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
39
|
H2H | |||||
|
12 May 2026 R1 |
6
2
6
0
|
W
|
Ilya Ivashka
Player
Kuan-Yi Lee
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
6 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
21
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Gwangju Challenger | ||||||||
|
19 Apr 2026 Q1 |
6
2
6
4
|
L
|
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Ilya Ivashka
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
4
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Bastian Trinker past matches
|
|
M15 Oberhaching 1 | ||||||||
|
16 Feb 2020 Q2 |
7
5
6
2
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
16 Feb 2020 Q1 |
7
5
4
6
15
13
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M15 Antalya 9 | ||||||||
|
14 Mar 2019 R2 |
6
7
6
3
6
1
|
L
|
Ivan Nedelko
Player
Bastian Trinker
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
68%
(
63 of
92)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
33 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
45 of
92)
102
Total Points Won
80
|
H2H | |||||
|
12 Mar 2019 R1 |
6
4
6
2
|
W
|
Bastian Trinker
Player
Or Ram-Harel
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M15 Antalya 8 | ||||||||
|
07 Mar 2019 R2 |
6
7
7
5
6
1
|
L
|
Matias Zukas
Player
Bastian Trinker
71%
(
77 of
109)
1st Serve %
74%
(
80 of
108)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
52 of
80)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
33%
(
36 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
108)
118
Total Points Won
99
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Ivashka VS Trinker matches vs all opponents
| stats | Ilya Ivashka | Bastian Trinker |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 62% (211/131) | 59% (48/33) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 60% (486/327) | 58% (107/79) |
| Games Won/Lost | 54% (4157/3486) | 53% (928/820) |
| Hard W/L | 62% (211/131) | 59% (48/33) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.33 | 0.1 |
| Total Aces | 1245 | 86 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 | 0.03 |
| Total Double Faults | 685 | 28 |
| Average Match Time | 1:17:1 | 1st Match |
| Average Opponent Rank | 731.32 | 1195.42 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (11455/18421) | 66% (623/941) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 70% (8050/11455) | 68% (423/623) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (3519/6953) | 52% (164/318) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 42% (822/1950) | 30% (20/67) |
| Return Points Won % | 41% (7674/18876) | 34% (314/930) |
| Slam W/L | 52% (15/14) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 56% (14/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (4/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 49% (21/22) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 61% (80/52) | 50% (3/3) |
| Futures W/L | 71% (75/31) | 61% (45/29) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (199/316) | 59% (47/79) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 52% (11/21) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 51% (53/103) | 48% (12/25) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 53% (55/103) | 54% (14/26) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (201/180) | 87% (46/40) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (201/21) | 13% (46/6) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (140/31) | 23% (35/8) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Ivashka VS Trinker H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Wang Vs Boisson Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Internationaux de Strasbourg – Strasbourg – 17th May 2026 (Day 0)
-
Joint Vs Li Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Internationaux de Strasbourg – Strasbourg – 17th May 2026 (Day 0)
-
Zakharova Vs Kasatkina Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Internationaux de Strasbourg – Strasbourg – 17th May 2026 (Day 0)
-
Sakkari Vs Stearns Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Internationaux de Strasbourg – Strasbourg – 17th May 2026 (Day 0)
-
Seidel Vs Andreeva Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA W75 Zagreb – 16th May 2026 (Day 6)
-
Wang Vs Boisson Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Internationaux de Strasbourg – Strasbourg – 17th May 2026 (Day 0)
-
Joint Vs Li Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Internationaux de Strasbourg – Strasbourg – 17th May 2026 (Day 0)
-
Zakharova Vs Kasatkina Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Internationaux de Strasbourg – Strasbourg – 17th May 2026 (Day 0)
-
Sakkari Vs Stearns Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Internationaux de Strasbourg – Strasbourg – 17th May 2026 (Day 0)
-
Seidel Vs Andreeva Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA W75 Zagreb – 16th May 2026 (Day 6)
