Illya Marchenko vs Omni Kumar H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Marchenko VS Kumar Head to Head: 2 - 0
The H2H record between Illya Marchenko and Omni Kumar stands at 2 - 0. In their last encounter on 20-08-2023 in the Q3 Round at the Winston-Salem Open - Winston-Salem, Marchenko got the win with 6-4 6-4. Marchenko stands at no. 641 in the rankings, whilst Kumar is no. 773.
Ranking
641 ( 03-07-26)
Best Rank
49 ( 26-09-16)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
Ranking
773 ( 03-07-26)
Best Rank
348 ( 18-03-24)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
2
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Marchenko VS Kumar H2H Matches played
|
|
Winston-Salem Open - Winston-Salem | ||||||||
|
20 Aug 2023 QF |
Illya Marchenko
Player
Omni Kumar
51%
(
29 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
54
|
6
4
6
4
|
|||||||
|
|
Salinas Challenger | ||||||||
|
24 Jul 2023 R1 |
Illya Marchenko
Player
Omni Kumar
51%
(
46 of
90)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
8
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
31 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
73)
85
Total Points Won
78
|
3
6
6
3
6
4
|
|||||||
Marchenko VS Kumar Head to head matches stats
| stats | Illya Marchenko | Omni Kumar |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 27 | 21 |
| Total Aces | 10 | 8 |
| Total Double Faults | 10 | 6 |
| Average Match Time | 2:6:15 | 2:6:15 |
| 1st Serve % | 51% (75/147) | 56% (76/135) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 71% (53/75) | 67% (51/76) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (39/72) | 44% (26/59) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 73% (8/11) | 36% (5/14) |
| Return Pts Won % | 43% (58/135) | 37% (55/147) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
Illya Marchenko past matches
|
|
M15 Antalya 4 | ||||||||
|
23 Feb 2026 Q2 |
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
22 Feb 2026 Q1 |
2
6
6
2
10
3
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M25 Antalya 2 | ||||||||
|
11 Jan 2026 Q1 |
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M25 Antalya 1 | ||||||||
|
08 Jan 2026 R2 |
7
6
7
6
|
L
|
Carlos Sanchez Jover
Player
Illya Marchenko
75%
(
70 of
93)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
102)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
9
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
45 of
62)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
100
Total Points Won
95
|
H2H | |||||
|
07 Jan 2026 R1 |
6
0
7
5
|
W
|
Illya Marchenko
Player
Cagan Efe Tufekci
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
44
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Omni Kumar past matches
|
|
Charlottesville Challenger | ||||||||
|
27 Oct 2024 Q1 |
6
7
7
6
7
6
|
L
|
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Omni Kumar
59%
(
79 of
135)
1st Serve %
54%
(
72 of
133)
8
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
2
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
49 of
72)
54%
(
30 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
57 of
135)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
55 of
133)
133
Total Points Won
135
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Sioux Falls Challenger | ||||||||
|
22 Oct 2024 R1 |
6
2
6
0
|
L
|
Mark Lajal
Player
Omni Kumar
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
14 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
31
|
H2H | |||||
|
21 Oct 2024 QF |
6
4
7
6
|
L
|
Cooper Woestendick
Player
Omni Kumar
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
23 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
20 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
64
|
H2H | |||||
|
20 Oct 2024 Q1 |
7
5
7
5
|
W
|
Omni Kumar
Player
Jacob Brumm
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
46%
(
36 of
78)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
34 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
82
Total Points Won
77
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M15 Monastir 41 | ||||||||
|
13 Oct 2024 F |
6
3
6
2
|
L
|
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Omni Kumar
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Marchenko VS Kumar matches vs all opponents
| stats | Illya Marchenko | Omni Kumar |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 58% (256/182) | 64% (255/141) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 57% (601/448) | 62% (558/335) |
| Games Won/Lost | 53% (5360/4844) | 55% (4603/3749) |
| Hard W/L | 58% (256/182) | 64% (255/141) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.32 | 0.21 |
| Total Aces | 1586 | 856 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 | 0.17 |
| Total Double Faults | 1448 | 682 |
| Average Match Time | 1:18:33 | 1:25:54 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 773.39 | 608.4 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (13982/24725) | 56% (11712/20738) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 72% (10053/13982) | 69% (8032/11712) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (5413/10734) | 51% (4643/9042) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 41% (992/2421) | 43% (1013/2330) |
| Return Points Won % | 39% (9462/24409) | 42% (8833/21055) |
| Slam W/L | 57% (28/21) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 29% (8/20) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (32/32) | 58% (7/5) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 61% (153/98) | 35% (16/30) |
| Futures W/L | 82% (31/7) | 69% (232/106) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (239/407) | 65% (249/386) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (12/24) | 40% (2/5) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 49% (84/171) | 55% (53/96) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 45% (67/148) | 51% (52/102) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (248/209) | 87% (263/228) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (248/39) | 13% (263/35) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (189/47) | 20% (133/26) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Marchenko VS Kumar H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Cirstea Vs Birrell Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Serrano Vs Noskova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Serrano Vs Noskova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Khachanov Vs Hanfmann Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Mensik Vs Dimitrov Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Cirstea Vs Birrell Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Serrano Vs Noskova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Serrano Vs Noskova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Khachanov Vs Hanfmann Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Mensik Vs Dimitrov Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Wimbledon – London – 2nd July 2026 (Day 4)
