Greg Jones vs Peter Polansky H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Jones VS Polansky Head to Head: 3 - 1
The H2H record between Greg Jones and Peter Polansky stands at 3 - 1. In their last encounter on 29-06-2016 in the First Round at the Canada F4, Jones got the win with 6-3 6-0. Jones stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Polansky is no. Ret..
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
179 ( 26-04-10)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
110 ( 25-06-18)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
3
1
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
Jones VS Polansky H2H Matches played
|
|
Canada F4 | ||||||||
|
29 Jun 2016 R1 |
Peter Polansky
Player
Greg Jones
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
5
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6
3
6
0
|
|||||||
|
|
Sydney Challenger | ||||||||
|
27 Feb 2013 R2 |
Greg Jones
Player
Peter Polansky
54%
(
47 of
87)
1st Serve %
57%
(
58 of
101)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
7
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
101)
96
Total Points Won
92
|
6
3
3
6
6
4
|
|||||||
|
|
West Lakes Challenger | ||||||||
|
07 Feb 2013 R2 |
Greg Jones
Player
Peter Polansky
74%
(
65 of
88)
1st Serve %
56%
(
56 of
100)
12
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
82%
(
53 of
65)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
22 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
100)
103
Total Points Won
85
|
4
6
6
1
7
6
|
|||||||
|
|
Granby Challenger | ||||||||
|
27 Jul 2010 R1 |
Greg Jones
Player
Peter Polansky
73%
(
56 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
45 of
66)
11
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
76%
(
16 of
21)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
29%
(
22 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
19 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
69
|
7
6
6
4
|
|||||||
Jones VS Polansky Head to head matches stats
| stats | Greg Jones | Peter Polansky |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 3 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 6 | 4 |
| Games Won | 48 | 48 |
| Total Aces | 36 | 12 |
| Total Double Faults | 11 | 15 |
| Average Match Time | 1:50:18 | 1:50:18 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (205/320) | 60% (185/310) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 73% (150/205) | 72% (133/185) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (57/115) | 53% (66/125) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 27% (7/26) | 32% (9/28) |
| Return Pts Won % | 36% (111/310) | 35% (113/320) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 75% (3/4) | 25% (1/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (2/1) | 0% (2/0) |
Greg Jones past matches
|
|
Canberra Challenger | ||||||||
|
28 Oct 2017 Q1 |
3
6
7
5
6
3
|
L
|
Alexander Babanine
Player
Greg Jones
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
48%
(
44 of
92)
6
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
8
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
38 of
44)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
27%
(
20 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
92)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Las Vegas Challenger | ||||||||
|
14 Oct 2017 Q1 |
7
5
4
6
7
6
|
L
|
Frederik Nielsen
Player
Greg Jones
55%
(
56 of
101)
1st Serve %
72%
(
85 of
118)
4
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
55 of
85)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
36%
(
36 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
47 of
118)
112
Total Points Won
107
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Fairfield Challenger | ||||||||
|
08 Oct 2017 Q2 |
6
3
6
4
|
L
|
Alexander Ward
Player
Greg Jones
44%
(
26 of
59)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
49
|
H2H | |||||
|
07 Oct 2017 Q1 |
7
6
2
6
6
4
|
W
|
Greg Jones
Player
Lucas Gomez
55%
(
53 of
97)
1st Serve %
68%
(
61 of
90)
21
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
2
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
42 of
61)
41%
(
18 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
37%
(
36 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
90)
94
Total Points Won
93
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Stockton Challenger | ||||||||
|
30 Sep 2017 Q1 |
6
2
6
0
|
L
|
Alejandro Gonzalez
Player
Greg Jones
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
56%
(
43 of
77)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
34)
23%
(
5 of
22)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
77)
72
Total Points Won
47
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Peter Polansky past matches
|
|
National Bank Open - Toronto | ||||||||
|
05 Aug 2023 Q1 |
6
2
6
4
|
L
|
Max Purcell
Player
Peter Polansky
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
10
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Citi Open - Washington | ||||||||
|
29 Jul 2023 Q1 |
6
2
6
0
|
L
|
Thai Kwiatkowski
Player
Peter Polansky
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Infosys Hall of Fame Open - Newport | ||||||||
|
16 Jul 2023 Q1 |
6
2
7
5
|
L
|
Skander Mansouri
Player
Peter Polansky
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M25 Cancun 1 | ||||||||
|
08 Feb 2022 R1 |
5
5
|
L
|
Michail Pervolarakis
Player
Peter Polansky
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve %
50%
(
16 of
32)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
11 of
16)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
38%
(
10 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
27
Total Points Won
31
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Cleveland Challenger | ||||||||
|
30 Jan 2022 Q1 |
6
3
7
6
|
L
|
Roberto Quiroz
Player
Peter Polansky
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
20 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
20 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Jones VS Polansky matches vs all opponents
| stats | Greg Jones | Peter Polansky |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 53% (193/168) | 57% (306/227) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 53% (450/399) | 56% (705/544) |
| Games Won/Lost | 51% (4200/4000) | 52% (6328/5772) |
| Hard W/L | 53% (193/168) | 57% (306/227) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.31 | 0.31 |
| Total Aces | 1237 | 1807 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 | 0.18 |
| Total Double Faults | 622 | 1088 |
| Average Match Time | 1st Match | 1:4:17 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 1008.43 | 835.35 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (7987/13312) | 58% (16315/28225) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 72% (5729/7987) | 70% (11478/16315) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (2625/5325) | 53% (6307/11910) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 40% (442/1113) | 40% (1050/2634) |
| Return Points Won % | 37% (4837/13195) | 38% (10801/28309) |
| Slam W/L | 38% (6/10) | 56% (34/27) |
| Masters W/L | 33% (1/2) | 38% (18/30) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 42% (13/18) | 39% (12/19) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 55% (120/97) | 55% (158/130) |
| Futures W/L | 56% (53/41) | 80% (82/20) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (190/354) | 58% (299/514) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) | 18% (2/11) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 52% (73/141) | 51% (102/200) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 49% (65/132) | 49% (87/176) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (198/159) | 86% (300/257) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (198/38) | 14% (300/43) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (163/32) | 20% (232/47) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Jones VS Polansky H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Bertola Vs Wu Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Nottingham 2 Challenger – 16th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Bertola Vs Wu Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Nottingham 2 Challenger – 16th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Sonmez Vs Fernandez Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Nottingham Open – Nottingham – 16th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Korneeva Vs Tian Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Ladies Open – Figueira da Foz – 16th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Zhang Vs Muchova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Berlin Tennis Open – Berlin – 16th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Bertola Vs Wu Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Nottingham 2 Challenger – 16th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Bertola Vs Wu Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Nottingham 2 Challenger – 16th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Sonmez Vs Fernandez Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Nottingham Open – Nottingham – 16th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Korneeva Vs Tian Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Ladies Open – Figueira da Foz – 16th June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Zhang Vs Muchova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Berlin Tennis Open – Berlin – 16th June 2026 (Day 2)
