Felix Corwin vs Nathan Ponwith H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Corwin VS Ponwith Head to Head: 1 - 0
The H2H record between Felix Corwin and Nathan Ponwith stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 04-10-2024 in the Quarterfinals Round at the M15 Ann Arbor 1, Corwin got the win with 6-0 6-3. Corwin stands at no. 842 in the rankings, whilst Ponwith is no. 874.
Ranking
842 ( 07-06-26)
Best Rank
478 ( 04-10-21)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
Ranking
874 ( 07-06-26)
Best Rank
367 ( 12-06-23)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Corwin VS Ponwith H2H Matches played
|
|
M15 Ann Arbor 1 | ||||||||
|
04 Oct 2024 QF |
Felix Corwin
Player
Nathan Ponwith
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6
0
6
3
|
|||||||
Corwin VS Ponwith Head to head matches stats
| stats | Felix Corwin | Nathan Ponwith |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Total Aces | 4 | 1 |
| Total Double Faults | 2 | 1 |
| Average Match Time | 1:14:0 | 1:14:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (29/52) | 63% (30/48) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 76% (22/29) | 47% (14/30) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 57% (13/23) | 56% (10/18) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 44% (4/9) | 0% (0/2) |
| Return Pts Won % | 50% (24/48) | 33% (17/52) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Felix Corwin past matches
|
|
M15 Orlando | ||||||||
|
24 Apr 2026 QF |
7
5
2
6
6
3
|
L
|
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Felix Corwin
56%
(
50 of
89)
1st Serve %
52%
(
47 of
91)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
35 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
91)
90
Total Points Won
90
|
H2H | |||||
|
23 Apr 2026 R2 |
6
1
6
4
|
W
|
Felix Corwin
Player
Andreja Petrovic
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve %
44%
(
29 of
66)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
H2H | |||||
|
22 Apr 2026 R1 |
6
3
6
2
|
W
|
Felix Corwin
Player
Safir Azam
49%
(
24 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M15 Orlando | ||||||||
|
15 Apr 2026 R1 |
6
4
6
3
|
L
|
Andreja Petrovic
Player
Felix Corwin
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
46%
(
28 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
52
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Sarasota Challenger | ||||||||
|
05 Apr 2026 Q1 |
2
6
6
2
7
5
|
L
|
Ronit Karki
Player
Felix Corwin
45%
(
40 of
88)
1st Serve %
51%
(
42 of
82)
2
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
7
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
35 of
42)
58%
(
28 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
14 of
40)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
33 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
82
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Nathan Ponwith past matches
|
|
M25 Las Vegas 1 | ||||||||
|
23 Mar 2026 Q2 |
6
7
6
1
14
12
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M25 Bakersfield 1 | ||||||||
|
19 Mar 2026 R2 |
6
7
6
2
6
2
|
L
|
Branko Djuric
Player
Nathan Ponwith
53%
(
53 of
100)
1st Serve %
71%
(
72 of
102)
16
Aces
0
14
Double Faults
5
92%
(
49 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
72)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
28%
(
28 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
40 of
102)
112
Total Points Won
90
|
H2H | |||||
|
18 Mar 2026 R1 |
4
6
6
3
7
5
|
W
|
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Jacob Brumm
62%
(
63 of
102)
1st Serve %
70%
(
72 of
103)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
48 of
72)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
36%
(
37 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
103)
108
Total Points Won
97
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Phoenix Challenger | ||||||||
|
09 Mar 2026 Q1 |
7
5
6
4
|
L
|
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Nathan Ponwith
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
79)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
79)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M15 San Jose 1 | ||||||||
|
23 Feb 2026 QF |
6
3
5
2
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
view more
Corwin VS Ponwith matches vs all opponents
| stats | Felix Corwin | Nathan Ponwith |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 58% (152/108) | 53% (144/128) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 57% (343/264) | 52% (326/304) |
| Games Won/Lost | 53% (3020/2654) | 51% (3023/2958) |
| Hard W/L | 58% (152/108) | 53% (144/128) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.38 | 0.2 |
| Total Aces | 1066 | 574 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 | 0.27 |
| Total Double Faults | 919 | 798 |
| Average Match Time | 1:25:31 | 1:25:51 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 659.99 | 584.27 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (7960/14002) | 58% (8465/14584) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 71% (5653/7960) | 66% (5623/8465) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (2778/6042) | 50% (3058/6119) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 42% (686/1628) | 40% (550/1381) |
| Return Points Won % | 42% (6254/14849) | 38% (5436/14148) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 47% (16/18) | 27% (13/36) |
| Futures W/L | 60% (136/90) | 59% (131/92) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (150/258) | 53% (144/271) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 49% (34/69) | 50% (36/72) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 53% (48/90) | 56% (48/85) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (137/119) | 81% (145/118) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (137/18) | 19% (145/27) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (122/32) | 20% (127/26) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Corwin VS Ponwith H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Baez Vs Molcan Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Prostejov Challenger – 7th June 2026 (Day 7)
-
Bonzi Vs Tomic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 7th June 2026 (Day 0)
-
Seidel Vs Minnen Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 7th June 2026 (Day 0)
-
Vandewinkel Vs Koevermans Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 7th June 2026 (Day 0)
-
Inglis Vs Parks Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA The HSBC Championships – London – 6th June 2026 (Day -1)
-
Baez Vs Molcan Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Prostejov Challenger – 7th June 2026 (Day 7)
-
Seidel Vs Minnen Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 7th June 2026 (Day 0)
-
Bonzi Vs Tomic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 7th June 2026 (Day 0)
-
Vandewinkel Vs Koevermans Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Libema Open – ‘s-Hertogenbosch – 7th June 2026 (Day 0)
-
Inglis Vs Parks Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA The HSBC Championships – London – 6th June 2026 (Day -1)
