Evan King vs Gavin Van Peperzeel H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
King VS Peperzeel Head to Head: 3 - 0
The H2H record between Evan King and Gavin Van Peperzeel stands at 3 - 0. In their last encounter on 14-03-2017 in the First Round at the Australia F2 (Canberra), King got the win with 6-4 6-2. King stands at no. 840 in the rankings, whilst Peperzeel is no. Ret..
Evan King
Ranking
840 ( 15-05-26)
Best Rank
185 ( 23-04-18)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
Gavin Van Peperzeel
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
251 ( 25-04-16)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
3
Total
0
0
Hard
0
2
Clay
0
0
Indoor
0
1
Grass
0
34 (25-03-1992)
Age
34 (29-03-1992)
185
Height
180
79
Weight
73
Left-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Two-Handed
Backhand
Two-Handed
Hunter Reese, Sean Maymi
Coach
National Academy & Greg Smith
2013
Turned Pro
52% (278-258)
Career Total W/L
58% (230-164)
56% (177-139)
Career Hard W/L
55% (107-88)
48% (64-68)
Career Clay W/L
63% (114-68)
31% (4-9)
Career Grass W/L
60% (9-6)
44% (33-42)
Career Indoor W/L
0% (0-2)
$106,495
Career Prize Money
$720
0% (0-0)
YTD Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
King VS Peperzeel H2H Matches played
|
Australia F2 (Canberra) | ||||||||
|
14 Mar 2017 R1 |
Evan King
Player
Gavin Van Peperzeel
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6
4
6
2
|
|||||||
|
Australia F1 (Mildura) | ||||||||
|
10 Mar 2017 QF |
Evan King
Player
Gavin Van Peperzeel
46%
(
30 of
65)
1st Serve %
50%
(
38 of
76)
4
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
9
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
69%
(
24 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
7
6
6
3
|
|||||||
|
|
USA F19 | ||||||||
|
19 Jun 2016 F |
Evan King
Player
Gavin Van Peperzeel
67%
(
58 of
86)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
5
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
21 of
65)
78
Total Points Won
73
|
7
6
6
3
|
|||||||
King VS Peperzeel Head to head matches stats
| stats | Evan King | Gavin Van Peperzeel |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 3 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 6 | 0 |
| Games Won | 38 | 24 |
| Total Aces | 14 | 17 |
| Total Double Faults | 8 | 15 |
| Average Match Time | 1:30:40 | 1:30:40 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (120/199) | 58% (116/200) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 76% (91/120) | 68% (79/116) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 61% (48/79) | 48% (40/84) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 30% (7/23) | 18% (2/11) |
| Return Pts Won % | 41% (81/200) | 30% (60/199) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (3/0) |
Evan King past matches
Before:
|
Champaign Challenger | ||||||||
|
10 Nov 2024 Q1 |
7
5
6
3
|
L
|
Micah Braswell
Player
Evan King
50%
(
35 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
7
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
24 of
30)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
20 of
54)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Taipei 2 Challenger | ||||||||
|
21 Oct 2024 QF |
4
6
6
3
6
4
|
L
|
Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong
Player
Evan King
72%
(
68 of
95)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
38 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
31 of
72)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
H2H | |||||
|
20 Oct 2024 Q1 |
6
4
3
6
6
2
|
W
|
Evan King
Player
Bang Shuo Yin
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
67%
(
57 of
85)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
6
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
44 of
57)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
85)
85
Total Points Won
78
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Santa Cruz de la Sierra Challenger | ||||||||
|
03 Mar 2024 Q1 |
6
3
6
2
|
L
|
Valerio Aboian
Player
Evan King
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
58%
(
39 of
67)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
H2H | |||||
|
Cary 1 Challenger | ||||||||
|
06 Aug 2023 Q1 |
7
6
7
5
|
L
|
Yuki Mochizuki
Player
Evan King
73%
(
60 of
82)
1st Serve %
52%
(
44 of
84)
2
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
26 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Gavin Van Peperzeel past matches
Before:
|
|
Australia F3 (Mornington) | ||||||||
|
19 Mar 2018 R1 |
6
7
6
3
6
1
|
L
|
Michael Look
Player
Gavin Van Peperzeel
70%
(
68 of
97)
1st Serve %
69%
(
65 of
94)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
33 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
94)
104
Total Points Won
87
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Australia F2 (Mildura) | ||||||||
|
07 Mar 2018 R2 |
5
7
7
5
6
4
|
L
|
Dayne Kelly
Player
Gavin Van Peperzeel
59%
(
67 of
114)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
95)
5
Aces
10
8
Double Faults
5
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
46 of
63)
43%
(
20 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
46 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
95)
101
Total Points Won
108
|
H2H | |||||
|
06 Mar 2018 R1 |
6
2
7
6
|
W
|
Gavin Van Peperzeel
Player
Edward Bourchier
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
5
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Australia F1 (Renmark) | ||||||||
|
27 Feb 2018 R1 |
6
7
7
6
6
3
|
L
|
Lucas Vuradin
Player
Gavin Van Peperzeel
58%
(
65 of
113)
1st Serve %
66%
(
73 of
111)
7
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
0
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
53 of
73)
63%
(
30 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
29%
(
33 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
38 of
111)
118
Total Points Won
106
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Launceston Challenger | ||||||||
|
03 Feb 2018 Q1 |
6
3
6
2
|
L
|
Renta Tokuda
Player
Gavin Van Peperzeel
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
46
|
H2H | |||||
view more
King VS Peperzeel matches vs all opponents
| stats | Evan King | Gavin Van Peperzeel |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 56% (177/139) | 55% (107/88) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 54% (392/328) | 56% (243/193) |
| Games Won/Lost | 52% (3578/3250) | 52% (2109/1983) |
| Hard W/L | 56% (177/139) | 55% (107/88) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.27 | 0.23 |
| Total Aces | 907 | 462 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Total Double Faults | 429 | 268 |
| Average Match Time | 1:6:5 | 1st Match |
| Average Opponent Rank | 831.5 | 1042.88 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (9520/14918) | 63% (3675/5841) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 69% (6605/9520) | 70% (2560/3675) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (2849/5398) | 50% (1077/2166) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 40% (551/1388) | 37% (211/569) |
| Return Points Won % | 38% (5790/15413) | 38% (2296/5991) |
| Slam W/L | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/3) |
| Masters W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 38% (3/5) | 33% (1/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 43% (60/81) | 53% (29/26) |
| Futures W/L | 70% (108/47) | 57% (77/57) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (172/310) | 55% (106/192) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 38% (39/103) | 64% (35/55) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 53% (47/88) | 39% (19/49) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (174/151) | 88% (112/98) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (174/23) | 13% (112/14) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (142/26) | 11% (83/9) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE King VS Peperzeel H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Halys Vs Perricard Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bordeaux Challenger – 15th May 2026 (Day 5)
-
Carreno-Busta Vs Clar Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Valencia Challenger – 15th May 2026 (Day 5)
-
Serrano Vs Krejcikova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Parma Ladies Open – Parma – 15th May 2026 (Day 5)
-
Seidel Vs Persson Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA W75 Zagreb – 15th May 2026 (Day 5)
-
Volynets Vs Starodubtseva Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Trophee Clarins – Paris – 15th May 2026 (Day 5)
-
Halys Vs Perricard Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bordeaux Challenger – 15th May 2026 (Day 5)
-
Carreno-Busta Vs Clar Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Valencia Challenger – 15th May 2026 (Day 5)
-
Serrano Vs Krejcikova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Parma Ladies Open – Parma – 15th May 2026 (Day 5)
-
Seidel Vs Persson Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA W75 Zagreb – 15th May 2026 (Day 5)
-
Volynets Vs Starodubtseva Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Trophee Clarins – Paris – 15th May 2026 (Day 5)
