Edward Bourchier vs Chase Ferguson H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Bourchier VS Ferguson Head to Head: 1 - 0
The H2H record between Edward Bourchier and Chase Ferguson stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 27-02-2018 in the First Round at the Australia F1 (Renmark), Bourchier got the win with 6-7(5) 6-1 6-4. Bourchier stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Ferguson is no. 655.
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
965 ( 08-10-18)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
Ranking
655 ( 16-07-26)
Best Rank
654 ( 08-12-25)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
Ferguson upcoming match (16-07-26)
Bourchier VS Ferguson H2H Matches played
|
|
Australia F1 (Renmark) | ||||||||
|
27 Feb 2018 R1 |
Edward Bourchier
Player
Chase Ferguson
77%
(
96 of
124)
1st Serve %
54%
(
62 of
114)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
60%
(
58 of
96)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
44%
(
54 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
55 of
114)
125
Total Points Won
113
|
6
7
6
1
6
4
|
|||||||
Bourchier VS Ferguson Head to head matches stats
| stats | Edward Bourchier | Chase Ferguson |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 18 | 12 |
| Total Aces | 5 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 4 | 4 |
| Average Match Time | 2:42:0 | 2:42:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 77% (96/124) | 54% (62/114) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 60% (58/96) | 58% (36/62) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (12/28) | 44% (23/52) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 50% (8/16) | 24% (4/17) |
| Return Pts Won % | 48% (55/114) | 44% (54/124) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Edward Bourchier past matches
|
|
M15 Mornington 2 | ||||||||
|
26 Mar 2019 R1 |
7
6
6
4
|
L
|
Rio Noguchi
Player
Edward Bourchier
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
65
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M15 Mornington 1 | ||||||||
|
20 Mar 2019 R1 |
6
2
6
2
|
L
|
Rio Noguchi
Player
Edward Bourchier
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M25 Mildura 1 | ||||||||
|
05 Mar 2019 QF |
7
6
6
3
|
L
|
Vincent Stouff
Player
Edward Bourchier
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
71%
(
52 of
73)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
26 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
H2H | |||||
|
03 Mar 2019 Q1 |
7
6
6
0
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M25 Albury 1 | ||||||||
|
24 Feb 2019 Q1 |
7
6
7
6
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
view more
Chase Ferguson past matches
|
|
M25 Brisbane | ||||||||
|
14 Jul 2026 R1 |
6
4
6
2
|
W
|
Chase Ferguson
Player
Yuki Mochizuki
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M15 Wuning | ||||||||
|
03 Jul 2026 QF |
7
5
6
2
|
L
|
Fitriadi M Rifqi
Player
Chase Ferguson
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
77%
(
58 of
75)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
57
|
H2H | |||||
|
02 Jul 2026 R2 |
6
2
6
4
|
W
|
Chase Ferguson
Player
Yuta Tomida
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
37%
(
21 of
57)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
H2H | |||||
|
01 Jul 2026 R1 |
7
6
6
3
|
W
|
Chase Ferguson
Player
Noritaka Koizumi
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M15 Wuning | ||||||||
|
25 Jun 2026 R2 |
6
4
6
3
|
L
|
Fanming Meng
Player
Chase Ferguson
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Bourchier VS Ferguson matches vs all opponents
| stats | Edward Bourchier | Chase Ferguson |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 57% (58/43) | 59% (89/62) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 54% (124/107) | 56% (193/149) |
| Games Won/Lost | 52% (1101/1023) | 53% (1694/1509) |
| Hard W/L | 57% (58/43) | 59% (89/62) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.09 | 0.14 |
| Total Aces | 95 | 218 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Total Double Faults | 111 | 173 |
| Average Match Time | 1st Match | 1:25:14 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 913.25 | 443.3 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (2093/3167) | 71% (5496/7781) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 65% (1357/2093) | 65% (3592/5496) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (522/1074) | 52% (1187/2285) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 35% (89/256) | 44% (346/795) |
| Return Points Won % | 35% (1096/3088) | 41% (3212/7909) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 39% (7/11) | 50% (3/3) |
| Futures W/L | 61% (51/32) | 59% (86/59) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (57/100) | 59% (88/148) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 48% (13/27) | 62% (23/37) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 70% (21/30) | 60% (24/40) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (54/47) | 94% (83/78) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (54/7) | 6% (83/5) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (47/11) | 15% (68/10) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Bourchier VS Ferguson H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Hontama Vs Parks Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Athens Open – Athens – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Vandewinkel Vs Falkowska Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Enka Open – Istanbul – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Knutson Vs Tararudee Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Enka Open – Istanbul – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Vandewinkel Vs Falkowska Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Enka Open – Istanbul – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Borges Vs Dimitrov Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Nordea Open – Bastad – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Hontama Vs Parks Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Athens Open – Athens – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Vandewinkel Vs Falkowska Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Enka Open – Istanbul – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Knutson Vs Tararudee Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Enka Open – Istanbul – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Vandewinkel Vs Falkowska Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Enka Open – Istanbul – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Borges Vs Dimitrov Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Nordea Open – Bastad – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
