Dusan Vemic vs Dave Lingman H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Vemic VS Lingman Head to Head: 1 - 0
The H2H record between Dusan Vemic and Dave Lingman stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 01-03-2008 in the Q1 round Round at the Tennis Channel Open - Las Vegas, Vemic got the win with 6-3 5-7 7-5. Vemic stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Lingman is no. Ret..
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
146 ( 25-02-08)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
963 ( 08-09-03)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Vemic VS Lingman H2H Matches played
|
Tennis Channel Open - Las Vegas | ||||||||
|
01 Mar 2008 Q1 |
Dusan Vemic
Player
Dave Lingman
63%
(
74 of
117)
1st Serve %
77%
(
85 of
111)
10
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
74%
(
55 of
74)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
54 of
85)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
42 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
44 of
111)
119
Total Points Won
109
|
6
3
5
7
7
5
|
|||||||
Vemic VS Lingman Head to head matches stats
| stats | Dusan Vemic | Dave Lingman |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 18 | 15 |
| Total Aces | 10 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 3 | 5 |
| Average Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (74/117) | 77% (85/111) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 74% (55/74) | 64% (54/85) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (20/43) | 50% (13/26) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 40% (4/10) | 30% (3/10) |
| Return Pts Won % | 40% (44/111) | 36% (42/117) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Dusan Vemic past matches
|
|
Vancouver Challenger | ||||||||
|
01 Aug 2011 Q1 |
5
7
7
5
7
5
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
Serbia F1 | ||||||||
|
13 Jun 2011 R1 |
6
1
3
6
7
6
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
13 Jun 2011 R2 |
6
4
6
3
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Zagreb Challenger | ||||||||
|
09 May 2011 Q1 |
6
3
6
4
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
Serbia Open - Belgrade | ||||||||
|
23 Apr 2011 Q1 |
7
5
7
5
|
L
|
Marsel Ilhan
Player
Dusan Vemic
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
1
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
13
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Dave Lingman past matches
|
|
Tennis Channel Open - Las Vegas | ||||||||
|
01 Mar 2008 Q1 |
6
3
5
7
7
5
|
L
|
Dusan Vemic
Player
Dave Lingman
63%
(
74 of
117)
1st Serve %
77%
(
85 of
111)
10
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
74%
(
55 of
74)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
54 of
85)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
42 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
44 of
111)
119
Total Points Won
109
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Thailand F1 | ||||||||
|
11 Feb 2008 R1 |
6
1
6
4
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
USA F2 | ||||||||
|
14 Jan 2008 R1 |
6
4
2
6
6
3
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
14 Jan 2008 R2 |
7
6
6
2
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
USA F29 | ||||||||
|
12 Nov 2007 R1 |
6
3
6
3
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
view more
Vemic VS Lingman matches vs all opponents
| stats | Dusan Vemic | Dave Lingman |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 54% (115/97) | 31% (9/20) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 52% (263/246) | 36% (24/43) |
| Games Won/Lost | 50% (2587/2536) | 45% (285/347) |
| Hard W/L | 54% (115/97) | 31% (9/20) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.08 | 0 |
| Total Aces | 211 | 0 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.04 | 0.02 |
| Total Double Faults | 111 | 5 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 1059.3 | 1219.59 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (1577/2384) | 77% (85/111) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 71% (1119/1577) | 64% (54/85) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (403/807) | 50% (13/26) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 33% (49/149) | 30% (3/10) |
| Return Points Won % | 33% (755/2285) | 36% (42/117) |
| Slam W/L | 27% (3/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 40% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (17/17) | 25% (1/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 55% (76/61) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (15/5) | 33% (8/16) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (112/209) | 31% (9/29) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 48% (50/105) | 60% (6/10) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 59% (51/87) | 33% (3/9) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (104/84) | 69% (13/9) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (104/20) | 31% (13/4) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 28% (108/30) | 0% (16/0) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Vemic VS Lingman H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Baez Vs Mrva Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Prostejov Challenger – 5th June 2026 (Day 5)
-
Walton Vs Legout Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Tyler Challenger – 5th June 2026 (Day 5)
-
Ouden Vs Nava Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bad Rappenau Challenger – 5th June 2026 (Day 5)
-
Kabbaj Vs Joint Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Makarska Open – Makarska – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Marcinko Vs Palicova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Makarska Open – Makarska – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Baez Vs Mrva Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Prostejov Challenger – 5th June 2026 (Day 5)
-
Walton Vs Legout Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Tyler Challenger – 5th June 2026 (Day 5)
-
Ouden Vs Nava Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bad Rappenau Challenger – 5th June 2026 (Day 5)
-
Kabbaj Vs Joint Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Makarska Open – Makarska – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Marcinko Vs Palicova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Makarska Open – Makarska – 4th June 2026 (Day 4)
