Dragos Constantin Ignat vs Jack Murray H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Ignat VS Murray Head to Head: 1 - 0
The H2H record between Dragos Constantin Ignat and Jack Murray stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 18-11-2018 in the Q3 Round at the USA F33 (Columbus), Ignat got the win with 7-5 1-6 6-4. Ignat stands at no. 990 in the rankings, whilst Murray is no. Ret..
Ranking
990 ( 03-06-26)
Best Rank
946 ( 09-12-19)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
1030 ( 23-04-18)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
Ignat VS Murray H2H Matches played
|
USA F33 (Columbus) | ||||||||
|
18 Nov 2018 QF |
Dragos Constantin Ignat
Player
Jack Murray
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
67%
(
52 of
78)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
35%
(
11 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
44%
(
38 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
78)
81
Total Points Won
83
|
7
5
1
6
6
4
|
|||||||
Ignat VS Murray Head to head matches stats
| stats | Dragos Constantin Ignat | Jack Murray |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 14 | 15 |
| Total Aces | 5 | 3 |
| Total Double Faults | 3 | 5 |
| Average Match Time | 2:18:0 | 2:18:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (55/86) | 67% (52/78) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 67% (37/55) | 63% (33/52) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (11/31) | 46% (12/26) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 56% (5/9) | 55% (6/11) |
| Return Pts Won % | 42% (33/78) | 44% (38/86) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Dragos Constantin Ignat past matches
|
M15 Bucharest | ||||||||
|
18 May 2026 Q1 |
6
2
6
2
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M15 Otopeni 1 | ||||||||
|
21 Sep 2025 Q1 |
6
2
2
6
10
7
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M15 Bucharest 4 | ||||||||
|
25 Aug 2025 Q2 |
6
4
7
6
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
24 Aug 2025 Q1 |
7
6
6
4
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
M25+H Bacau 1 | ||||||||
|
20 Jul 2025 Q1 |
7
5
6
1
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
view more
Jack Murray past matches
|
|
USA F33 (Columbus) | ||||||||
|
18 Nov 2018 QF |
7
5
1
6
6
4
|
L
|
Dragos Constantin Ignat
Player
Jack Murray
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
67%
(
52 of
78)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
35%
(
11 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
44%
(
38 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
78)
81
Total Points Won
83
|
H2H | |||||
|
17 Nov 2018 Q1 |
6
2
6
2
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
Japan F4 (Tsukuba) | ||||||||
|
27 Mar 2018 R1 |
6
1
2
1
|
L
|
Yosuke Watanuki
Player
Jack Murray
50%
(
20 of
40)
1st Serve %
79%
(
19 of
24)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
60%
(
12 of
20)
1st Serve Won
5%
(
1 of
19)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
48%
(
19 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
83%
(
20 of
24)
41
Total Points Won
23
|
H2H | |||||
|
26 Mar 2018 QF |
6
4
7
5
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
|
25 Mar 2018 Q2 |
7
6
6
0
|
W
|
H2H | ||||||
view more
Ignat VS Murray matches vs all opponents
| stats | Dragos Constantin Ignat | Jack Murray |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 63% (45/27) | 70% (40/17) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 59% (93/65) | 70% (87/37) |
| Games Won/Lost | 53% (770/687) | 59% (627/431) |
| Hard W/L | 63% (45/27) | 70% (40/17) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Total Aces | 39 | 28 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.09 | 0.09 |
| Total Double Faults | 61 | 44 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 786.68 | 941.21 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (1103/1613) | 64% (725/1125) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 60% (664/1103) | 60% (433/725) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (228/510) | 51% (205/400) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 33% (56/171) | 41% (52/126) |
| Return Points Won % | 39% (676/1729) | 40% (459/1134) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 63% (44/26) | 70% (40/17) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (41/67) | 69% (38/55) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 54% (7/13) | 67% (6/9) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 69% (9/13) | 25% (3/12) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (45/41) | 89% (44/39) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (45/4) | 11% (44/5) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (27/3) | 8% (13/1) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Ignat VS Murray H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Maria Vs Fruhvirtova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Birmingham Open – Birmingham – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Walton Vs Wu Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Tyler Challenger – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Trungelliti Vs Shelbayh Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bad Rappenau Challenger – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Hibino Vs Tjen Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Birmingham Open – Birmingham – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Damas Vs Dzumhur Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Prostejov Challenger – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Maria Vs Fruhvirtova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Birmingham Open – Birmingham – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Walton Vs Wu Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Tyler Challenger – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Trungelliti Vs Shelbayh Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Bad Rappenau Challenger – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Hibino Vs Tjen Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Birmingham Open – Birmingham – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Damas Vs Dzumhur Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Prostejov Challenger – 2nd June 2026 (Day 2)
