Dekel Bar vs Chevaan Davids H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Bar VS Davids Head to Head: 1 - 0
The H2H record between Dekel Bar and Chevaan Davids stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 02-11-2015 in the First Round at the South Africa F1, Bar got the win with 6-1 6-1. Bar stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Davids is no. Ret..
Dekel Bar
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
593 ( 31-07-17)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
Chevaan Davids
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
1417 ( 14-09-15)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
1
Total
0
1
Hard
0
0
Clay
0
0
Indoor
0
0
Grass
0
33 (15-03-1993)
Age
31 (31-01-1995)
Height
Weight
Plays
Backhand
Coach
Turned Pro
43% (126-166)
Career Total W/L
37% (11-19)
44% (126-159)
Career Hard W/L
37% (11-19)
0% (0-3)
Career Clay W/L
0% (0-0)
0% (0-0)
Career Grass W/L
0% (0-0)
0% (0-4)
Career Indoor W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0% (0-0)
YTD Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
Bar VS Davids H2H Matches played
|
South Africa F1 | ||||||||
|
02 Nov 2015 R1 |
Dekel Bar
Player
Chevaan Davids
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve %
49%
(
19 of
39)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
51
Total Points Won
22
|
6
1
6
1
|
|||||||
Bar VS Davids Head to head matches stats
| stats | Dekel Bar | Chevaan Davids |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 2 |
| Total Aces | 5 | 0 |
| Total Double Faults | 2 | 4 |
| Average Match Time | 0:52:0 | 0:52:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (20/34) | 49% (19/39) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 90% (18/20) | 37% (7/19) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 71% (10/14) | 45% (9/20) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 63% (5/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts Won % | 59% (23/39) | 18% (6/34) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Dekel Bar past matches
Before:
|
|
Israel F13 (Ashkelon) | ||||||||
|
18 Oct 2017 R2 |
6
2
3
6
6
4
|
L
|
Ram Kapach
Player
Dekel Bar
64%
(
66 of
103)
1st Serve %
48%
(
35 of
73)
4
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
9
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
35%
(
36 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
27 of
73)
94
Total Points Won
82
|
H2H | |||||
|
17 Oct 2017 R1 |
6
1
2
6
6
2
|
W
|
Dekel Bar
Player
Edan Bakshi
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
8
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
3
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
USA F26 (Decatur) | ||||||||
|
02 Aug 2017 R1 |
2
0
|
L
|
Evan Zhu
Player
Dekel Bar
50%
(
3 of
6)
1st Serve %
50%
(
2 of
4)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
33%
(
1 of
3)
1st Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
100%
(
3 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Rtn Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
8
Total Points Won
2
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Binghamton Challenger | ||||||||
|
25 Jul 2017 R1 |
6
3
6
2
|
L
|
Edward Corrie
Player
Dekel Bar
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
66)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
H2H | |||||
|
23 Jul 2017 QF |
6
2
6
4
|
W
|
Dekel Bar
Player
Shane Monroe
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Chevaan Davids past matches
Before:
|
|
South Africa F3 (Stellenbosch) | ||||||||
|
01 Dec 2018 Q1 |
6
1
6
0
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
South Africa F2 (Stellenbosch) | ||||||||
|
24 Nov 2018 Q1 |
6
3
6
2
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
South Africa F3 | ||||||||
|
16 Nov 2015 Q2 |
7
6
6
3
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
|
South Africa F2 | ||||||||
|
09 Nov 2015 R1 |
2
6
6
4
6
4
|
L
|
Lloyd Segal
Player
Chevaan Davids
70%
(
62 of
88)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
84)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
86
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
South Africa F1 | ||||||||
|
02 Nov 2015 R1 |
6
1
6
1
|
L
|
Dekel Bar
Player
Chevaan Davids
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve %
49%
(
19 of
39)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
51
Total Points Won
22
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Bar VS Davids matches vs all opponents
| stats | Dekel Bar | Chevaan Davids |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 44% (126/159) | 37% (11/19) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 45% (289/360) | 39% (26/41) |
| Games Won/Lost | 48% (2879/3071) | 45% (255/316) |
| Hard W/L | 44% (126/159) | 37% (11/19) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.14 | 0 |
| Total Aces | 394 | 0 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 | 0.03 |
| Total Double Faults | 511 | 9 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 1183.87 | 1161.57 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (4422/7396) | 55% (68/123) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 68% (2997/4422) | 57% (39/68) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (1449/2973) | 44% (24/55) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 44% (299/680) | 56% (5/9) |
| Return Points Won % | 39% (2864/7300) | 37% (45/122) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 45% (123/153) | 37% (11/19) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 44% (125/282) | 37% (11/30) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 46% (34/74) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 54% (44/82) | 43% (3/7) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (129/110) | 77% (13/10) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (129/18) | 23% (13/3) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (156/16) | 6% (17/1) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Bar VS Davids H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Djere Vs Duckworth Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Gonet Geneva Open – Geneva – 19th May 2026 (Day 2)
-
Paul Vs Etcheverry Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Hamburg Open – Hamburg – 19th May 2026 (Day 2)
-
Arango Vs Seidel Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Grand Prix De SAR La Princesse Lalla Meryem – Rabat – 19th May 2026 (Day 2)
-
Jardi Vs Maria Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Grand Prix De SAR La Princesse Lalla Meryem – Rabat – 19th May 2026 (Day 2)
-
Altmaier Vs Shelton Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Hamburg Open – Hamburg – 19th May 2026 (Day 2)
-
Djere Vs Duckworth Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Gonet Geneva Open – Geneva – 19th May 2026 (Day 2)
-
Paul Vs Etcheverry Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Hamburg Open – Hamburg – 19th May 2026 (Day 2)
-
Arango Vs Seidel Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Grand Prix De SAR La Princesse Lalla Meryem – Rabat – 19th May 2026 (Day 2)
-
Jardi Vs Maria Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Grand Prix De SAR La Princesse Lalla Meryem – Rabat – 19th May 2026 (Day 2)
-
Altmaier Vs Shelton Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Hamburg Open – Hamburg – 19th May 2026 (Day 2)
