Daniel Masur vs Botic Van De Zandschulp H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Masur VS Zandschulp Head to Head: 1 - 1
The H2H record between Daniel Masur and Botic Van De Zandschulp stands at 1 - 1. In their last encounter on 31-07-2025 in the Second Round at the Hagen Challenger, Zandschulp got the win with 6-4 6-1. Masur stands at no. 374 in the rankings, whilst Zandschulp is no. 56.
Daniel Masur
Ranking
374 ( 19-06-26)
Best Rank
176 ( 07-03-22)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Ranking
56 ( 19-06-26)
Best Rank
22 ( 29-08-22)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
1
Total
1
0
Hard
0
1
Clay
1
0
Indoor
0
0
Grass
0
31 (06-11-1994)
Age
30 (04-10-1995)
183
Height
191
78
Weight
85
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Two-Handed
Backhand
Two-Handed
Lars Uebel
Coach
Peter Lucassen, Fred Hemmes
2013
Turned Pro
2016
57% (450-339)
Career Total W/L
60% (395-260)
56% (102-79)
Career Hard W/L
57% (78-59)
55% (151-123)
Career Clay W/L
61% (184-116)
39% (9-14)
Career Grass W/L
43% (13-17)
60% (188-123)
Career Indoor W/L
64% (120-68)
$156,200
Career Prize Money
$4,275,720
63% (27-16)
YTD Win/Loss
48% (13-14)
Masur VS Zandschulp H2H Matches played
|
Hagen Challenger | ||||||||
|
31 Jul 2025 R2 |
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Daniel Masur
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
13
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
48
|
6
4
6
1
|
|||||||
|
|
Netherlands F2 | ||||||||
|
25 Jun 2016 SF |
Daniel Masur
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
64%
(
82 of
128)
1st Serve %
74%
(
72 of
97)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
54 of
82)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
50 of
72)
50%
(
23 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
40%
(
51 of
128)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
38 of
97)
115
Total Points Won
110
|
5
7
6
4
6
4
|
|||||||
Masur VS Zandschulp Head to head matches stats
| stats | Daniel Masur | Botic Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 3 |
| Games Won | 22 | 27 |
| Total Aces | 6 | 14 |
| Total Double Faults | 2 | 5 |
| Average Match Time | 1:55:11 | 1:55:11 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (124/190) | 71% (110/156) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 63% (78/124) | 72% (79/110) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (29/66) | 46% (21/46) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 33% (4/12) | 26% (6/23) |
| Return Pts Won % | 36% (56/156) | 44% (83/190) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Daniel Masur past matches
Before:
|
Nottingham 2 Challenger | ||||||||
|
13 Jun 2026 Q1 |
6
1
6
4
|
L
|
Jay Clarke
Player
Daniel Masur
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
71%
(
32 of
45)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
H2H | |||||
|
Tyler Challenger | ||||||||
|
31 May 2026 Q1 |
6
2
6
2
|
L
|
Bruno Kuzuhara
Player
Daniel Masur
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
38
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Little Rock Challenger | ||||||||
|
24 May 2026 Q1 |
6
2
6
4
|
L
|
Joshua Sheehy
Player
Daniel Masur
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
27 of
49)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Wuxi Challenger | ||||||||
|
04 May 2026 QF |
6
3
6
7
6
3
|
L
|
Petr Bar Biryukov
Player
Daniel Masur
55%
(
61 of
110)
1st Serve %
49%
(
41 of
83)
27
Aces
10
8
Double Faults
2
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
33 of
41)
55%
(
27 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
36 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
26 of
83)
100
Total Points Won
93
|
H2H | |||||
|
03 May 2026 Q1 |
6
4
6
2
|
W
|
Daniel Masur
Player
Leo Vithoontien
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Botic Van De Zandschulp past matches
Before:
|
|
HSBC Championships - London | ||||||||
|
18 Jun 2026 R2 |
7
6
6
3
|
L
|
Tommy Paul
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
89)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
H2H | |||||
|
15 Jun 2026 R1 |
6
4
7
6
|
W
|
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Harry Wendelken
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
85)
8
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
82%
(
42 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
30%
(
22 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Libema Open - 's-Hertogenbosch | ||||||||
|
10 Jun 2026 R1 |
6
2
6
7
6
4
|
L
|
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
66%
(
69 of
104)
1st Serve %
67%
(
67 of
100)
8
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
42 of
67)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
38 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
100)
110
Total Points Won
94
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
French Open - Paris | ||||||||
|
25 May 2026 R1 |
6
3
6
4
6
7
6
4
|
L
|
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
61%
(
92 of
152)
1st Serve %
59%
(
93 of
157)
5
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
9
68%
(
63 of
92)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
64 of
93)
48%
(
29 of
60)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
39%
(
60 of
152)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
66 of
157)
158
Total Points Won
151
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Bordeaux Challenger | ||||||||
|
15 May 2026 R2 |
6
1
2
0
|
L
|
Quentin Halys
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
54%
(
13 of
24)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
36%
(
14 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
40
Total Points Won
23
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Masur VS Zandschulp matches vs all opponents
| stats | Daniel Masur | Botic Van De Zandschulp |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 56% (102/79) | 57% (78/59) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 56% (227/180) | 53% (185/167) |
| Games Won/Lost | 53% (2031/1826) | 51% (1752/1684) |
| Hard W/L | 56% (102/79) | 57% (78/59) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.33 | 0.51 |
| Total Aces | 616 | 853 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 | 0.35 |
| Total Double Faults | 413 | 594 |
| Average Match Time | 1:8:40 | 1:56:59 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 757.73 | 294.34 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (5529/8886) | 62% (6601/10720) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 71% (3902/5529) | 72% (4767/6601) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (1678/3357) | 47% (1956/4119) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 41% (342/843) | 43% (408/949) |
| Return Points Won % | 38% (3511/9123) | 38% (4215/10964) |
| Slam W/L | 14% (1/6) | 61% (19/12) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (1/1) | 48% (15/16) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/3) | 57% (33/25) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 57% (55/42) | 64% (7/4) |
| Futures W/L | 63% (45/27) | 67% (4/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (98/177) | 57% (64/112) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 52% (12/23) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 52% (36/69) | 56% (31/55) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 43% (21/49) | 64% (30/47) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (105/88) | 87% (67/58) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (105/17) | 13% (67/9) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (75/12) | 29% (70/20) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Masur VS Zandschulp H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Cecchinato Vs Assche Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Parma Challenger – 18th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Golubic Vs Sonmez Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Nottingham Open – Nottingham – 18th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Korneeva Vs Kubka Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Ladies Open – Figueira da Foz – 18th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Brooksby Vs Cerundolo Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP HSBC Championships – London – 17th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Brooksby Vs Cerundolo Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP HSBC Championships – London – 17th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Cecchinato Vs Assche Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Parma Challenger – 18th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Golubic Vs Sonmez Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Nottingham Open – Nottingham – 18th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Korneeva Vs Kubka Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Ladies Open – Figueira da Foz – 18th June 2026 (Day 4)
-
Brooksby Vs Cerundolo Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP HSBC Championships – London – 17th June 2026 (Day 3)
-
Brooksby Vs Cerundolo Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP HSBC Championships – London – 17th June 2026 (Day 3)
