Connor Bruce vs Nathan Ponwith H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com

By James Morris

Bruce VS Ponwith Head to Head: 1 - 1

The H2H record between Connor Bruce and Nathan Ponwith stands at 1 - 1. In their last encounter on 24-07-2024 in the First Round at the M25 Champaign 1, Ponwith got the win with 6-4 6-3. Bruce stands at no. - in the rankings, whilst Ponwith is no. 874.

Bruce vs Ponwith Prediction H2H
USA
Connor Bruce

Ranking

- ( 17-06-26)

Best Rank

( 01-01-70)

trophyatp Titles

0

trophyatp Titles

0

trophy Grand Slams

0

trophy Masters

0

trophy Main Tour

0

Recent Form

W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
Bruce vs Ponwith Prediction H2H
USA
Nathan Ponwith

Ranking

874 ( 17-06-26)

Best Rank

367 ( 12-06-23)

trophyatp Titles

0

trophyatp Titles

0

trophy Grand Slams

0

trophy Masters

0

trophy Main Tour

0

Recent Form

W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L

1

Total

1

1

Hard

1

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

Bruce VS Ponwith H2H Matches played

Hard M25 Champaign 1

24 Jul

2024

R1

cross
Connor Bruce
Player
Nathan Ponwith
70% ( 42 of 60)
1st Serve %
53% ( 37 of 70)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
79% ( 33 of 42)
1st Serve Won
57% ( 21 of 37)
39% ( 7 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 16 of 33)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
17% ( 1 of 6)
33% ( 20 of 60)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 33 of 70)
73
Total Points Won
57
6 4
6 3
Hard M15 Los Angeles 1

26 Jun

2024

R1

cross
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Connor Bruce
65% ( 51 of 79)
1st Serve %
54% ( 52 of 97)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
8
71% ( 36 of 51)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 35 of 52)
57% ( 16 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 20 of 45)
33% ( 4 of 12)
Break Points Won
33% ( 3 of 9)
34% ( 27 of 79)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 42 of 97)
94
Total Points Won
82
2 6
6 2
6 4

Bruce VS Ponwith Head to head matches stats

stats Connor Bruce Nathan Ponwith
All Head to Head Matches 1 1
Sets Won 3 2
Games Won 24 21
Total Aces 8 5
Total Double Faults 13 4
Average Match Time 2:8:0 2:8:0
1st Serve % 60% (94/157) 59% (88/149)
1st Serve Win % 72% (68/94) 65% (57/88)
2nd Serve Win % 43% (27/63) 52% (32/61)
Total Break Points Won % 41% (7/17) 28% (5/18)
Return Pts Won % 40% (60/149) 39% (62/157)
Best of 3 Sets Win % 50% (1/2) 50% (1/2)
Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Total Tiebreaks Win % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win % 0% (0/1) 100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match 50% (2/1) 0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match 50% (2/1) 0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match 0% (0/0) 50% (2/1)

Connor Bruce past matches

I.hard M15 Tallahassee 1

19 Nov

2024

QF

6 1
6 4
L
H2H

18 Nov

2024

Q1

6 4
6 3
W
H2H
Hard M15 Winston-Salem 1

17 Oct

2024

R2

7 5
6 2
L
cross
Matthew Thomson
Player
Connor Bruce
63% ( 36 of 57)
1st Serve %
63% ( 44 of 70)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
72% ( 26 of 36)
1st Serve Won
59% ( 26 of 44)
62% ( 13 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
50% ( 13 of 26)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
32% ( 18 of 57)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 31 of 70)
70
Total Points Won
57
H2H

16 Oct

2024

R1

6 1
6 2
W
cross
Connor Bruce
Player
Tristan Mccormick
72% ( 39 of 54)
1st Serve %
59% ( 23 of 39)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
77% ( 30 of 39)
1st Serve Won
52% ( 12 of 23)
53% ( 8 of 15)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 7 of 16)
80% ( 4 of 5)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 3)
30% ( 16 of 54)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 20 of 39)
58
Total Points Won
35
H2H

15 Oct

2024

QF

6 3
5 7
10 7
W
H2H

Nathan Ponwith past matches

Hard M25 Las Vegas 1

23 Mar

2026

Q2

6 7
6 1
14 12
L
H2H
Hard M25 Bakersfield 1

19 Mar

2026

R2

6 7
6 2
6 2
L
cross
Branko Djuric
Player
Nathan Ponwith
53% ( 53 of 100)
1st Serve %
71% ( 72 of 102)
16
Aces
0
14
Double Faults
5
92% ( 49 of 53)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 45 of 72)
49% ( 23 of 47)
2nd Serve Won
57% ( 17 of 30)
57% ( 4 of 7)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 7)
28% ( 28 of 100)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 40 of 102)
112
Total Points Won
90
H2H

18 Mar

2026

R1

4 6
6 3
7 5
W
cross
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Jacob Brumm
62% ( 63 of 102)
1st Serve %
70% ( 72 of 103)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
70% ( 44 of 63)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 48 of 72)
54% ( 21 of 39)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 12 of 31)
38% ( 5 of 13)
Break Points Won
29% ( 4 of 14)
36% ( 37 of 102)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 43 of 103)
108
Total Points Won
97
H2H
Hard Phoenix Challenger

09 Mar

2026

Q1

7 5
6 4
L
cross
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Nathan Ponwith
67% ( 41 of 61)
1st Serve %
73% ( 58 of 79)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
80% ( 33 of 41)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 37 of 58)
65% ( 13 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
62% ( 13 of 21)
40% ( 2 of 5)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 1)
25% ( 15 of 61)
Rtn Points Won
37% ( 29 of 79)
75
Total Points Won
65
H2H
Hard M15 San Jose 1

23 Feb

2026

QF

6 3
5 2
L
H2H

Bruce VS Ponwith matches vs all opponents

stats Connor Bruce Nathan Ponwith
YTD Win/Loss 61% (17/11) 53% (144/128)
Sets Won/Lost 59% (39/27) 52% (326/304)
Games Won/Lost 54% (338/291) 51% (3023/2958)
Hard W/L 61% (17/11) 53% (144/128)
Clay W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Indoor Hard W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Grass W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces Per Game 0.07 0.2
Total Aces 22 574
Double Faults Per Game 0.12 0.27
Total Double Faults 38 798
Average Match Time 1st Match 1:25:51
Average Opponent Rank 452.64 589.67
1st Serve % 62% (470/764) 58% (8465/14584)
1st Serve Win % 63% (295/470) 66% (5623/8465)
2nd Serve Win % 43% (126/294) 50% (3058/6119)
Total Break Points Won % 49% (26/53) 40% (550/1381)
Return Points Won % 36% (235/645) 38% (5436/14148)
Slam W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Masters W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 0% (0/0) 27% (13/36)
Futures W/L 61% (17/11) 59% (131/92)
Best of 3 Sets Win % 61% (17/28) 53% (144/271)
Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/1)
Total Tiebreaks Win % 50% (1/2) 50% (36/72)
Deciding Set Win % 50% (5/10) 56% (48/85)
1st Set Won, Won Match 74% (19/14) 81% (145/118)
1st Set Won, Lost Match 26% (19/5) 19% (145/27)
1st Set Lost, Won Match 33% (9/3) 20% (127/26)
banner

Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.

Bruce & Ponwith Last Match Highlights

YouTube video

SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Bruce VS Ponwith H2H

UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS

You Might Also Like