Clay Thompson vs David Rice H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Thompson VS Rice Head to Head: 1 - 0
The H2H record between Clay Thompson and David Rice stands at 1 - 0. In their last encounter on 16-11-2015 in the Q3 Round at the Champaign Challenger, Thompson got the win with 6-3 5-7 7-5. Thompson stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Rice is no. Ret..
Clay Thompson
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
408 ( 02-05-16)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
David Rice
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
283 ( 10-02-14)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
1
Total
0
0
Hard
0
0
Clay
0
1
Indoor
0
0
Grass
0
34 (04-05-1992)
Age
37 (01-01-1989)
198
Height
193
86
Weight
90
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Two-Handed
Backhand
Two-Handed
Scott Bailey
Coach
Turned Pro
58% (90-66)
Career Total W/L
55% (290-239)
57% (72-54)
Career Hard W/L
61% (140-90)
57% (4-3)
Career Clay W/L
29% (14-35)
0% (0-1)
Career Grass W/L
52% (38-35)
64% (14-8)
Career Indoor W/L
55% (98-79)
$920
Career Prize Money
$12,000
0% (0-0)
YTD Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
Thompson VS Rice H2H Matches played
|
Champaign Challenger | ||||||||
|
16 Nov 2015 QF |
Clay Thompson
Player
David Rice
59%
(
60 of
101)
1st Serve %
68%
(
71 of
104)
9
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
44 of
71)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
46%
(
46 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
104)
102
Total Points Won
103
|
6
3
5
7
7
5
|
|||||||
Thompson VS Rice Head to head matches stats
| stats | Clay Thompson | David Rice |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 18 | 15 |
| Total Aces | 9 | 4 |
| Total Double Faults | 4 | 2 |
| Average Match Time | 2:11:47 | 2:11:47 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (60/101) | 68% (71/104) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 62% (37/60) | 62% (44/71) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (18/41) | 39% (13/33) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 73% (8/11) | 78% (7/9) |
| Return Pts Won % | 45% (47/104) | 46% (46/101) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Clay Thompson past matches
Before:
|
USA F11 (Calabasas) | ||||||||
|
22 Mar 2017 R1 |
6
2
6
1
|
L
|
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Clay Thompson
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
USA F2 (Long Beach) | ||||||||
|
11 Jan 2017 R1 |
6
4
6
4
|
L
|
Evan King
Player
Clay Thompson
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
5
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
9
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
USA F1 (Los Angeles) | ||||||||
|
06 Jan 2017 R2 |
7
5
6
7
7
6
|
L
|
H2H | ||||||
|
03 Jan 2017 R1 |
6
1
6
2
|
W
|
Clay Thompson
Player
Ricardo Hocevar
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
15
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
USA F28 | ||||||||
|
15 Sep 2016 R2 |
6
4
6
4
|
L
|
Evan Zhu
Player
Clay Thompson
60%
(
52 of
87)
1st Serve %
47%
(
30 of
64)
2
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
7
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
64)
77
Total Points Won
74
|
H2H | |||||
view more
David Rice past matches
Before:
|
|
Great Britain F3 | ||||||||
|
16 Feb 2016 R1 |
7
6
7
5
|
L
|
Stefano Napolitano
Player
David Rice
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
76%
(
65 of
85)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
40 of
65)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
28 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
85)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Great Britain F2 | ||||||||
|
09 Feb 2016 R1 |
7
6
6
2
|
L
|
Lloyd Glasspool
Player
David Rice
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Great Britain F1 | ||||||||
|
02 Feb 2016 R1 |
6
3
6
1
|
L
|
Raymond Sarmiento
Player
David Rice
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Bangkok Challenger | ||||||||
|
09 Jan 2016 Q1 |
4
6
6
3
6
2
|
L
|
Kirill Dmitriev
Player
David Rice
55%
(
51 of
93)
1st Serve %
63%
(
59 of
93)
7
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
14
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
62%
(
26 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
9 of
34)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
40%
(
37 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
84
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Champaign Challenger | ||||||||
|
16 Nov 2015 QF |
6
3
5
7
7
5
|
L
|
Clay Thompson
Player
David Rice
59%
(
60 of
101)
1st Serve %
68%
(
71 of
104)
9
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
44 of
71)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
46%
(
46 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
104)
102
Total Points Won
103
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Thompson VS Rice matches vs all opponents
| stats | Clay Thompson | David Rice |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 57% (72/54) | 61% (140/90) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 56% (163/127) | 58% (308/219) |
| Games Won/Lost | 53% (1464/1307) | 53% (2550/2222) |
| Hard W/L | 57% (72/54) | 61% (140/90) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.32 | 0.05 |
| Total Aces | 432 | 125 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 | 0.07 |
| Total Double Faults | 314 | 156 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 900.94 | 1143.13 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (2512/4269) | 62% (1311/2113) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 73% (1824/2512) | 69% (905/1311) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (861/1757) | 42% (340/802) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 40% (142/358) | 45% (125/277) |
| Return Points Won % | 36% (1540/4254) | 44% (1005/2292) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 45% (14/17) | 59% (22/15) |
| Futures W/L | 63% (57/33) | 61% (118/75) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (70/124) | 62% (139/225) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 45% (19/42) | 45% (22/49) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 47% (18/38) | 60% (43/72) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (74/64) | 86% (129/111) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (74/10) | 13% (129/17) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (52/7) | 29% (101/29) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Thompson VS Rice H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Seidel Vs Andreeva Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA W75 Zagreb – 16th May 2026 (Day 6)
-
Tabilo Vs Kecmanovic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Valencia Challenger – 16th May 2026 (Day 6)
-
Krejcikova Vs Yastremska Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Parma Ladies Open – Parma – 16th May 2026 (Day 6)
-
Jacquemot Vs Zakharova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Internationaux de Strasbourg – Strasbourg – 16th May 2026 (Day -1)
-
Kessler Vs Zarazua Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Internationaux de Strasbourg – Strasbourg – 16th May 2026 (Day -1)
-
Seidel Vs Andreeva Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA W75 Zagreb – 16th May 2026 (Day 6)
-
Tabilo Vs Kecmanovic Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Valencia Challenger – 16th May 2026 (Day 6)
-
Krejcikova Vs Yastremska Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Parma Ladies Open – Parma – 16th May 2026 (Day 6)
-
Jacquemot Vs Zakharova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Internationaux de Strasbourg – Strasbourg – 16th May 2026 (Day -1)
-
Kessler Vs Zarazua Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Internationaux de Strasbourg – Strasbourg – 16th May 2026 (Day -1)
