Christopher Heyman vs Edan Leshem H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Heyman VS Leshem Head to Head: 2 - 1
The H2H record between Christopher Heyman and Edan Leshem stands at 2 - 1. In their last encounter on 25-02-2022 in the Quarterfinals Round at the M25 Vale do Lobo 1, Heyman got the win with 0-6 6-2 6-0. Heyman stands at no. Ret. in the rankings, whilst Leshem is no. 899.
Christopher Heyman
Ranking
Ret.
Best Rank
258 ( 19-02-18)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
Edan Leshem
Ranking
899 ( 23-06-26)
Best Rank
249 ( 18-12-17)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
2
Total
1
2
Hard
1
0
Clay
0
0
Indoor
0
0
Grass
0
32 (08-10-1993)
Age
29 (19-03-1997)
188
Height
183
90
Weight
72
Left-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
One-Handed
Backhand
Two-Handed
Coach
Amos Mansdrof
Turned Pro
64% (352-201)
Career Total W/L
58% (308-221)
66% (113-58)
Career Hard W/L
62% (265-163)
61% (154-98)
Career Clay W/L
38% (5-8)
0% (0-0)
Career Grass W/L
50% (1-1)
65% (85-45)
Career Indoor W/L
43% (37-49)
$0
Career Prize Money
$26,870
0% (0-0)
YTD Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
Heyman VS Leshem H2H Matches played
|
M25 Vale do Lobo 1 | ||||||||
|
25 Feb 2022 QF |
Christopher Heyman
Player
Edan Leshem
80%
(
61 of
76)
1st Serve %
52%
(
36 of
69)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
27%
(
4 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
33 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
0
6
6
2
6
0
|
|||||||
|
|
Houston Challenger | ||||||||
|
11 Nov 2019 R1 |
Edan Leshem
Player
Christopher Heyman
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
50 of
82)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
41 of
82)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
6
4
6
4
|
|||||||
|
|
Israel F5 | ||||||||
|
15 Mar 2016 R1 |
Christopher Heyman
Player
Edan Leshem
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
69%
(
51 of
74)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
7
6
6
3
|
|||||||
Heyman VS Leshem Head to head matches stats
| stats | Christopher Heyman | Edan Leshem |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 3 |
| Games Won | 33 | 29 |
| Total Aces | 7 | 10 |
| Total Double Faults | 6 | 9 |
| Average Match Time | 1:50:46 | 1:50:46 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (148/221) | 62% (129/208) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 66% (97/148) | 66% (85/129) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (33/73) | 41% (32/79) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 53% (10/19) | 29% (8/28) |
| Return Pts Won % | 44% (91/208) | 41% (91/221) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (2/1) | 0% (1/0) |
Christopher Heyman past matches
Before:
|
Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve Challenger | ||||||||
|
23 Jan 2023 Q1 |
6
3
7
6
|
L
|
Tibo Colson
Player
Christopher Heyman
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
11
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
77%
(
23 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
13 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
H2H | |||||
|
M15 Lodz 1 | ||||||||
|
28 Jul 2022 R2 |
6
4
6
2
|
L
|
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Christopher Heyman
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
H2H | |||||
|
27 Jul 2022 R1 |
6
1
6
3
|
W
|
Christopher Heyman
Player
Adrien Gobat
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M25 Marburg 1 | ||||||||
|
07 Jul 2022 R2 |
7
5
6
4
|
L
|
Sidane Pontjodikromo
Player
Christopher Heyman
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
77%
(
59 of
77)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
H2H | |||||
|
06 Jul 2022 R1 |
4
1
|
W
|
Christopher Heyman
Player
Philip Sekulic
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve %
69%
(
9 of
13)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
67%
(
10 of
15)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
18
Total Points Won
13
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Edan Leshem past matches
Before:
|
|
M25 Setubal 1 | ||||||||
|
05 Jun 2024 R1 |
1
6
7
5
7
5
|
L
|
Vasco Leote Prata
Player
Edan Leshem
58%
(
50 of
86)
1st Serve %
66%
(
68 of
103)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
40 of
68)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
41%
(
35 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
103)
93
Total Points Won
96
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M15 Heraklion 1 | ||||||||
|
06 Mar 2024 R1 |
6
4
6
2
|
L
|
Drew Van Orderlain
Player
Edan Leshem
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Indian Wells 2 Challenger | ||||||||
|
21 Jan 2024 Q1 |
7
5
6
2
|
L
|
Bruno Kuzuhara
Player
Edan Leshem
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Indian Wells 1 Challenger | ||||||||
|
15 Jan 2024 QF |
7
5
6
3
|
L
|
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Edan Leshem
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
73%
(
63 of
86)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
83
Total Points Won
63
|
H2H | |||||
|
14 Jan 2024 Q1 |
6
1
6
1
|
W
|
Edan Leshem
Player
Gonzalo Lama
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
38%
(
17 of
45)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Heyman VS Leshem matches vs all opponents
| stats | Christopher Heyman | Edan Leshem |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 66% (113/58) | 62% (265/163) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 63% (243/143) | 62% (584/364) |
| Games Won/Lost | 56% (1958/1559) | 55% (4780/3934) |
| Hard W/L | 66% (113/58) | 62% (265/163) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.16 | 0.27 |
| Total Aces | 270 | 1152 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 | 0.28 |
| Total Double Faults | 237 | 1195 |
| Average Match Time | 1st Match | 1:17:1 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 1023.44 | 977.64 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (4569/6797) | 57% (12221/21628) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 68% (3113/4569) | 71% (8708/12221) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (1162/2228) | 51% (4824/9407) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 48% (344/713) | 44% (1083/2481) |
| Return Points Won % | 43% (2834/6668) | 42% (9368/22238) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/4) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 40% (4/6) | 44% (41/52) |
| Futures W/L | 68% (109/52) | 68% (219/105) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 65% (110/168) | 64% (256/403) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 13% (1/8) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 54% (25/46) | 46% (43/93) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 57% (27/47) | 46% (47/102) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (111/99) | 86% (283/243) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (111/12) | 13% (283/38) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (60/14) | 15% (144/21) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Heyman VS Leshem H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Starodubtseva Vs Zakharova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Eastbourne Open – Eastbourne – 23rd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Lys Vs Navarro Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Bad Homburg Open – Bad Homburg – 23rd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Marozsan Vs Tabilo Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Mallorca Championships – Mallorca – 23rd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Udvardy Vs Bondar Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Eastbourne Open – Eastbourne – 23rd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Struff Vs Borges Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Mallorca Championships – Mallorca – 23rd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Starodubtseva Vs Zakharova Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Eastbourne Open – Eastbourne – 23rd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Lys Vs Navarro Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Bad Homburg Open – Bad Homburg – 23rd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Marozsan Vs Tabilo Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Mallorca Championships – Mallorca – 23rd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Udvardy Vs Bondar Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Lexus Eastbourne Open – Eastbourne – 23rd June 2026 (Day 2)
-
Struff Vs Borges Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Mallorca Championships – Mallorca – 23rd June 2026 (Day 2)
