Cem Ilkel vs Tim Van Rijthoven H2H Stats and Results - Stevegtennis.com
By James Morris
Ilkel VS Rijthoven Head to Head: 2 - 0
The H2H record between Cem Ilkel and Tim Van Rijthoven stands at 2 - 0. In their last encounter on 11-11-2022 in the Quarterfinals Round at the Bratislava Challenger, Ilkel got the win with 6-4 7-5. Ilkel stands at no. 807 in the rankings, whilst Rijthoven is no. 871.
Cem Ilkel
Ranking
807 ( 17-07-26)
Best Rank
144 ( 29-11-21)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
0
Recent Form
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
Tim Van Rijthoven
Ranking
871 ( 17-07-26)
Best Rank
101 ( 18-07-22)
Grand Slams
0
Masters
0
Main Tour
1
Recent Form
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
2
Total
0
1
Hard
0
0
Clay
0
1
Indoor
0
0
Grass
0
30 (21-08-1995)
Age
29 (24-04-1997)
185
Height
188
81
Weight
88
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Two-Handed
Backhand
One-Handed
Gavin Hopper
Coach
Igor Sijsling
2013
Turned Pro
2015
56% (438-338)
Career Total W/L
61% (234-147)
61% (288-181)
Career Hard W/L
65% (80-43)
44% (57-72)
Career Clay W/L
56% (61-48)
10% (1-9)
Career Grass W/L
62% (8-5)
55% (92-76)
Career Indoor W/L
63% (85-51)
$225,530
Career Prize Money
$499,600
0% (0-1)
YTD Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
Ilkel VS Rijthoven H2H Matches played
|
Bratislava Challenger | ||||||||
|
11 Nov 2022 QF |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
10
Aces
15
0
Double Faults
0
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
20 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
62
|
6
4
7
5
|
|||||||
|
Pozoblanco Challenger | ||||||||
|
23 Jul 2021 QF |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
52%
(
46 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
48 of
80)
5
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
62%
(
26 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
27 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
26 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
81
|
7
5
7
6
|
|||||||
Ilkel VS Rijthoven Head to head matches stats
| stats | Cem Ilkel | Tim Van Rijthoven |
|---|---|---|
| All Head to Head Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 27 | 20 |
| Total Aces | 15 | 22 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 1 |
| Average Match Time | 1:42:59 | 1:42:59 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (88/153) | 63% (91/145) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 81% (71/88) | 74% (67/91) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 58% (38/65) | 59% (32/54) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 38% (3/8) | 0% (0/7) |
| Return Pts Won % | 32% (46/145) | 29% (44/153) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Cem Ilkel past matches
Before:
|
Istanbul Challenger | ||||||||
|
17 May 2026 Q1 |
6
1
5
7
6
3
|
L
|
Vladyslav Orlov
Player
Cem Ilkel
54%
(
48 of
89)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Chisinau Challenger | ||||||||
|
29 May 2025 R2 |
6
4
6
7
7
6
|
L
|
Petr Bar Biryukov
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
68 of
107)
1st Serve %
78%
(
80 of
103)
22
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
1
85%
(
58 of
68)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
61 of
80)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
27 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
26 of
103)
106
Total Points Won
104
|
H2H | |||||
|
28 May 2025 R1 |
6
4
6
3
|
W
|
Cem Ilkel
Player
Mukund Sasikumar
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
74%
(
49 of
66)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Tbilisi Challenger | ||||||||
|
18 May 2025 Q1 |
7
6
6
3
|
L
|
Giles Hussey
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
61 of
95)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
65)
82
Total Points Won
78
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
M25 Tbilisi 1 | ||||||||
|
13 May 2025 R1 |
6
2
6
4
|
L
|
Evgeny Karlovskiy
Player
Cem Ilkel
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Tim Van Rijthoven past matches
Before:
|
|
French Open - Paris | ||||||||
|
19 May 2025 Q1 |
7
6
6
0
|
L
|
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
2
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
2
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
76
Total Points Won
56
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Australian Open - Melbourne | ||||||||
|
07 Jan 2025 Q1 |
6
0
6
3
|
L
|
Jerome Kym
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
20 of
35)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
53
Total Points Won
27
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
U.S. Open - New York | ||||||||
|
19 Aug 2024 Q1 |
6
2
7
5
|
L
|
Kyrian Jacquet
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
46%
(
27 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
5
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
4
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
H2H | |||||
|
|
Grodzisk Mazowiecki Challenger | ||||||||
|
12 Aug 2024 R1 |
6
7
6
0
6
3
|
L
|
Manuel Guinard
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
54%
(
43 of
79)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
89)
9
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
3
86%
(
37 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
20 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
89)
92
Total Points Won
76
|
H2H | |||||
|
Wimbledon - London | ||||||||
|
24 Jun 2024 Q1 |
6
7
7
6
6
1
|
L
|
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
71%
(
75 of
105)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
8
Aces
14
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
60 of
75)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
45 of
54)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
25 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
24%
(
21 of
86)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
H2H | |||||
view more
Ilkel VS Rijthoven matches vs all opponents
| stats | Cem Ilkel | Tim Van Rijthoven |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Win/Loss | 61% (288/181) | 65% (80/43) |
| Sets Won/Lost | 59% (631/440) | 60% (172/114) |
| Games Won/Lost | 53% (5350/4741) | 54% (1500/1283) |
| Hard W/L | 61% (288/181) | 65% (80/43) |
| Clay W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.32 | 0.56 |
| Total Aces | 1593 | 769 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 | 0.2 |
| Total Double Faults | 771 | 271 |
| Average Match Time | 1:5:51 | 1:24:52 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 886.27 | 737.53 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (12861/22032) | 63% (4602/7318) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 71% (9108/12861) | 76% (3482/4602) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (4705/9171) | 55% (1490/2716) |
| Total Break Points Won % | 41% (929/2274) | 40% (265/655) |
| Return Points Won % | 40% (8844/22248) | 37% (2934/7832) |
| Slam W/L | 47% (7/8) | 29% (2/5) |
| Masters W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 14% (1/6) | 40% (2/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 52% (79/72) | 56% (24/19) |
| Futures W/L | 69% (198/90) | 76% (52/16) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (280/457) | 66% (77/117) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 40% (2/5) | 50% (1/2) |
| Total Tiebreaks Win % | 56% (87/156) | 48% (22/46) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 56% (74/132) | 68% (28/41) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (280/244) | 88% (75/66) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (280/34) | 12% (75/9) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (188/42) | 27% (48/13) |
Data is for all tournament levels. To remove lower level events as per ATP & WTA head to head data, click the button in page footer.
SHARE PREDICTION IMAGES OF THE Ilkel VS Rijthoven H2H
UPCOMING TENNIS PREDICTIONS & HEAD TO HEADS
You Might Also Like
-
Dzumhur Vs Arnaldi Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Plava Laguna Croatia Open – Umag – 16th July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Korneeva Vs Li Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Athens Open – Athens – 16th July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Faria Vs Ruud Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP EFG Swiss Open – Gstaad – 16th July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Hontama Vs Parks Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Athens Open – Athens – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Vandewinkel Vs Falkowska Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Enka Open – Istanbul – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Dzumhur Vs Arnaldi Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP Plava Laguna Croatia Open – Umag – 16th July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Korneeva Vs Li Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Athens Open – Athens – 16th July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Faria Vs Ruud Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – ATP EFG Swiss Open – Gstaad – 16th July 2026 (Day 4)
-
Hontama Vs Parks Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Athens Open – Athens – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
-
Vandewinkel Vs Falkowska Prediction, Pick & H2H Stats Analysis – WTA Enka Open – Istanbul – 15th July 2026 (Day 3)
